Posted on 12/19/2002 8:31:51 AM PST by marktuoni
And you also seem to think highly of "confessions". You know about as much about police and juries as you do about reading and comprehension. Nil
No help was gained because I have no idea what your post means.
Yep, in Manhattan, I have run into some real winners at the Post Office, the DMV and the library. Dim bulbs with nasty, hostile attitudes (toward everyone, but particularly whites). Once, at the 34th street Motor Vehicles, one was playing rap on a boom box so loud -- right there on the counter -- that me and all the other customers at her window couldn't even hear ourselves over that garbage, and had to yell back and forth to communicate. Of course, she refused to turn the blasted thing off, or even turn it down. The supervisor on site did nothing.
Weird. Maybe those kids just mugged her and beat her half to death, left her to die, and the unknown, unnamed serial rapist came along....?
Weird.
Yes, and if I'm not mistaken, 1970 follows 1968, and so if something happened in 1970, that would follow President Nixon's election in 1968.
I was pointing that this Judge is drawing a lot of attention to President Nixon and himeself for a some unexplained reason in his bio. The man quit his job in January 1970 and President Nixon was elected in 1968. Why bring up the point unless there is some connection or event? Otherwise, these are two facts that may not have have anything remotely in common. How are we to know without additional information.
Heck, I lived on the same planet as President Nixon from 1970 until he died and I won't put that fact in my autobiography. Big Deal
Jriemer
I'm not an expert on fairies, but all the fairies I have known were male.
And once again you, not I, posited that these indivduals were "innocent." There was never any reference to they being "not guilty." The only body that can dispense that term, namely their jury, came out with a definiative GUILTY.
And your assertion is based upon what?
And let's go one better - how would you solve this "problem?"
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
LOL, great stuff. When you disagree with anyone, call them a DU poster. LOL,, man you got the drill down to a tee.
And once again you, not I, posited that these indivduals were "innocent."
Repeating the same falsehood over and over never makes it true. And putting it inside quotation marks doesn't either.
There was never any reference to they being "not guilty." The only body that can dispense that term, namely their jury, came out with a definiative GUILTY.
There are only two legal states, guilty and not guilty. The guilty verdict has been thrown out. That leaves the obvious, not guilty until proven otherwise.
Perhaps you would be more comfortable posting at an AOL chatroom, where you would be among your intellectual equals. LOL
Once more, you lie.
I do not and hopefully a jury will reconvict them of the beating attack.
I do too, if they are guilty.
That's why my "service piece" is a Browning Hi-Power -- it's a solid chunk of steel that can be used as a club if necessary. The dogleg .45 is even better for this.
BTW, nice pics on your site!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.