And once again you, not I, posited that these indivduals were "innocent." There was never any reference to they being "not guilty." The only body that can dispense that term, namely their jury, came out with a definiative GUILTY.
LOL, great stuff. When you disagree with anyone, call them a DU poster. LOL,, man you got the drill down to a tee.
And once again you, not I, posited that these indivduals were "innocent."
Repeating the same falsehood over and over never makes it true. And putting it inside quotation marks doesn't either.
There was never any reference to they being "not guilty." The only body that can dispense that term, namely their jury, came out with a definiative GUILTY.
There are only two legal states, guilty and not guilty. The guilty verdict has been thrown out. That leaves the obvious, not guilty until proven otherwise.
Perhaps you would be more comfortable posting at an AOL chatroom, where you would be among your intellectual equals. LOL