Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott vows to fight, but support slipping: Many on Capitol Hill see Bush push to replace SML
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, December 18, 2002 | By Joseph Farah

Posted on 12/17/2002 11:47:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Edited on 12/18/2002 10:27:09 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON – Trent Lott fans were as scarce as hen's teeth in this town yesterday.

============================================================

Apologies, apologies

Hoping to salvage his candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination amid growing controversy, Rev. Jesse Jackson apologized Tuesday night on White Entertainment Television for remarks seen as critical of seven-term Democratic Sen. Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, revered as an icon and elder statesman in his party.

"My comments were hurtful, needlessly opened old wounds and, for this, I sincerely apologize," said Rev. Jackson in the W.E.T. interview, seen as make-or-break for his candidacy.

Jackson's public relations offensive comes as Senate Democrats push to oust incoming GOP Majority Leader Trent Lott over 'racially tinged' remarks at a recent Centennial birthday tribute for retiring GOP Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina. Sen. Lott said fellow Mississippians were proud of casting their vote for Thurmond in 1948 when he ran for president as a Dixiecrat on a segregationist platform, adding that the country, had he won, would be far better off today.

The comments were seized by Democrats to force Lott from the leadership and hopefully from the Senate altogether, making for a 50-50 split and putting Democrats within striking distance of keeping the gavel next month.

Complicating their effort, the Rev. Jackson, in his third run for the nomination, touched off an uproar among party leaders Saturday over comments alluding to Sen. Byrd's past as Grand Kleagle of the Klu Klux Klan, a group with strong roots in the Democratic Party and that Jackson could ill-afford to alienate. Raising the specter of Sen. Byrd could, moreover, open Democrats up to charges of hypocrisy and undermine the drive to topple Sen. Lott, allowing the Senate to fall under GOP control the next session.

"There are things about Sen. Byrd's past I can't say I'm proud of," Rev. Jackson told FOXNEWS Saturday, initially sparking the furor. Pressed if he meant the Senator's past affiliation with the KKK, cautiously Jackson replied: "Well, some might construe it that way, yes -- but that's for others to judge."

Jackson's comments drew sharp rebuke as "insensitive" from the Democratic Congressional White Caucus and the Yellow Dog Democrat Association for the Advancement of White People, influential Byrd bastions both and whose support is crucial to seeking the nomination.

Burris Dunn, president of the National Association of White Colleges and Universities, and a big Byrd supporter, called Jackson's comments "incredibly stupid" and a "mindboggling tactical blunder," handing ammo to Republicans.

"Here we were," he said, "right at the cusp of victory, our party poised to keep the Senate from falling back into Republican hands and along comes that [expletive deleted] Jackson to gum up the works! Unbelievable! The Republican Party, need I remind you, is the party of Lincoln, the moron who freed the slaves, for crying out loud! How disgusting! I mean, think about it: Peter Jennings, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw et al have been very careful, throughout the Lott brouhaha, not to muddy the waters with Sen. Byrd, not even hint on his past dealings, but that idiot [expletive deleted] Jackson has to pop his mouth off!"

Jackson, angering party stalwarts further, refused Saturday to say whether he would seek the endorsement of Sen. Byrd, who was Senate Majority Leader for 12 years. For Democratic presidential hopefuls, receiving the 'Byrd blessing', as party insiders call it, has traditionally been essential to winning the Party's nomination. Eschewing the 'Byrd blessing' would be a controversial break with party tradition and could doom Jackson's chances.

But in his mea-culpa interview last night on W.E.T., Jackson tried to make amends with Sen. Byrd, a former KKK recruiter who once vowed never to serve in an integrated military.

"I want to apologize to Sen. Byrd, whom I've offended," said a humble and contrite Rev. Jackson. "My remarks were totally inappropriate and totally offensive."

Asked if, as an act of contrition, he now plans to seek Byrd's endorsement, Jackson was unequivocal: "Of course I will. Why, I consider it an honor and a privilege just being in the same room with Sen. Byrd, the conscious of the Senate."

The Byrd camp remained unconvinced, however.

"Let me put it to you this way," said a top Byrd staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "If I were Jackson, I sure as heck wouldn't want to be alone in the woods anywhere near Sen. Byrd right now. Not that my boss would ever consider endorsing that [expletive deleted] Jackson, but the total lack of respect he's shown for our party's Grand Kleagle is especially galling."

Aids to Sen. Daschle expressed similar sentiments.

"What the heck is the matter with Jackson, anyway?", one top aid fumed. "Why hand Republicans ammunition like that? What is he, stupid, or what? For weeks, every morning, I pick up the phone and remind Katie Curic and other media mouthpieces of ours not to mention Sen. Byrd, our beloved Grand Kleagle, or risk blowing our phony baloney pro-civil rights cover. Why can't Jackson just keep his piehole shut for once?"

A furious Sen. Ernest Fritz Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina, spoke on the record. "Everybody likes to go to Geneva. A lot of Geneva-ing goin' on out there. I used to do it for the Law of the Seas conferences, and you'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just come up and get a good square meal in Geneva."

I reminded him that, not long ago, those very words got him in a heap of trouble with African diplomats. "Oh, C'mon," he shot back. "I was only joking! Right now I'm so hopping mad at that [expletive deleted] Jackson, I could [expletive deleted]. We're so, so close to getting the Senate back! We've got the party of Lincoln, that traitor, scurrying for cover -- on the run like never before! Now that [expletive deleted] Jackson shows up and hands Republicans the loaded gun to kill us!"

I asked Democrat staffers what they thought of the media coverage so far.

"Oh, our people at CNN are doing a wonderful job," one aid said effusively. "At CNN, it's all Lott, all the time. 24/7. They're keeping up the pressure on Republicans. Dittos MSNBC -- all Lott, all the time. Even the Weather Channel is talking about Lott. I heard one forecaster say something like, now for the weather in Mississippi, where that Republican racist hatemonger Lott is from, etc."

And the newspapers?

"In the morning, I pick up the Washington Post, and page one -- all devoted to Lott. Turn to page two, and read more about Lott. Turn to page 3, and read yet more about Lott. Lott this, Lott that, heck, you need to turn all the way to page 15 to see anything about Iraq, Saddam, the War on Terror. hehehe, as a Democrat, it sure feels like hog heaven to me."

Then I broke the bad news to him: The GOP, despite weeks of wall-to-wall negative coverage, hasn't been the least bit tarnished by it. Well over half -- 56% -- view the Republican Party favorably in an ABC News/Washington Post poll just out, while 60% believe the GOP is "committed to equal opportunity for minorities."

But that's not the worse news for Democrats: Even a majority of minorities in the survey -- 52% -- see the Republican Party, despite all the propaganda, as "committed to equal opportunity for minorities."

Ouch! For Dems, that's gotta hurt ;^)

Anyway, that's....

My two cents...
"JohnHuang2"



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: Texasforever
Once again you haven't proven jack.

Wrong, and your post here proves that when you ask for facts, and they are presented, you're unwilling to deal with them.

The race card is now applicable for anyone whatsoever that is against any action benefiting a minority based on what you are "thinking".

Fair enough. Let's see you answer that question from the other night...

You claimed that in every measurable way, blacks were worse off now than they were 50 years ago, and that black progress was illusory.

Were blacks better off under segregation?




81 posted on 12/18/2002 1:03:59 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; nopardons
Actually, see's kind of a charming matriarch once she starts sending you FRemails and you get to know her! Even if she is a fan of a flat tax vs a NRST. (;o

BTW, CBC RAT John Lewis is "willing to accept the Vacant Lott's apology and forgive him".

Gee, I wonder if it's because they know they've gone too far and the Lott won't be their favorite GOP Leader anymore? He's not much of a liberal legislator if he's not ML now, is he?

I'd almost entertain the thought that Lott's appearance and unmitigate left-leaning last night was his attempt to save himself, offer up a race-pimp-friendly agenda that only a ML can 'get done'...all the while just setting up his 'come back' as a back bencher???

As weird as this has been, stranger strategies have been floated.
82 posted on 12/18/2002 1:04:55 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I am on the hate crime one

"Go back to the light."




83 posted on 12/18/2002 1:05:26 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I'm heading back to DC for the new Senate inductees for my friend Norm Coleman, so I'll carry the 'hello' for you! Can't wait to say 'hello' myself...
84 posted on 12/18/2002 1:06:53 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: nopardons
No, I have had to defend myself from just this kind of attack more times than I can count.

If you said something nice once, or more than once, I apologize for saying you haven't....but frankly, you and several others here kind of blend together in my thinking as a tag team many many times to attack me vociferously. So you might understand if those kind words are hard to remember.

You always have to make it personal, and start in with the personal insults.

By the way, it is a delusion if anyone thinks Lott is going to survive this as ML...you are in what is known as denial. It has been apparent for days that he has made himself unacceptable to Republicans as their leader. He went into this whole thing with tenuous support at best, and it is now nearing zero.

This is not the time for a divisive figure like this...it is time for a respected leader that can unify our party.
86 posted on 12/18/2002 1:08:47 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"Tell me..what do you REALLY mean when you say that affirmative action is wrong. Why can't an inference of racism be gleaned from that stance?"

So, you equate reverse discrimination with things like a)telling a man because of his skin color that he can't use the same bathroom as a white man, b)telling a man because of his skin color that he can't go to the same government school as a white man, etc? See, it doesn't wash, and when you're not prostrate to the world, for good-reasonable reason, you can point that out.
87 posted on 12/18/2002 1:09:41 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever

To: Sabertooth

Were blacks better off under segregation?

They were sure as hell not any worse off and they at least had the excuse that they were not responsible for it. They do not have that excuse today.

85 posted on 12/18/2002 1:08 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]




Well, that's a keeper. Anytime you think you can play the race card on me, go for it.





88 posted on 12/18/2002 1:11:27 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
I don't need lessons on racial tolerance from a guy that calls Colin Powell an "affirmative action puke". You have shown yourself to be the real deal when it comes to racism.
89 posted on 12/18/2002 1:12:41 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
Were blacks better off under segregation?


are they better off in prison?


90 posted on 12/18/2002 1:14:59 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I can support my position all but you have is hypocricy.
91 posted on 12/18/2002 1:15:01 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever; Sabertooth; EternalVigilance
"They were sure as hell not any worse off and they at least had the excuse that they were not responsible for it. They do not have that excuse today."

Sooner or later, we see the Lott defenders have no defense as well and understand why they support Lott's slip of the tongue's...don't we now.

To say that we would all be better off without segregation, intimating that people with colored skin should still have their own drinking fountain, is all brought to us by the Vacant Lott...and now his supporters.

Enough fun for one night...adios all and God's speed!
92 posted on 12/18/2002 1:16:45 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Pot / kettle and the fact that you, of all people have decided that I am part of a " tag team " , is specious. I have said " nice " words to you, on several occassion. You have chosen to forget those interludes. Ergo, one can assume , from that, and the fact that you find what I say so forgetable, that you don't know what you're talking about. In point of fact, you are emotinally lashing out and accusing me of what you do. That's called projection.

You just remember that we have disagreed, are disagreeing now, and so you slam back with a personal attack. Fine, I don't care. Just don't call me out for doing what you are guilty of. K ? :-)

A respected leader, who ( not that ) can unify the GOP ? Who ? Name a GOP Senator, who is a respected leader and is going to attempt to take over the ML spot.

93 posted on 12/18/2002 1:17:44 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
To say that we would all be better off without segregation, intimating that people with colored skin should still have their own drinking fountain, is all brought to us by the Vacant Lott...and now his supporters.

You are pitiful. Tell us again about affimitive action Powell.

94 posted on 12/18/2002 1:18:32 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I can support my position all but you have is hypocricy.

Your position is that Blacks were no worse off under segregation than they are now.

That would mean Blacks had it at least as good under segreation as they do now.

And you say you can support this? Go ahead.




95 posted on 12/18/2002 1:18:54 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
So, you like Colin Powell's affirmative action (gag), pro-abortion, anti-school choice views? You can have him. Even he won't defend the stupid/vacuous Lott...but you will. Do you believe what comes out you head, through you hands and into the FreeRepublic?
96 posted on 12/18/2002 1:19:37 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
"Were blacks better off under segregation?


are they better off in prison?


Ok, the single winged loons are out...is it a full moon?
97 posted on 12/18/2002 1:20:53 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"You are pitiful. Tell us again about affimitive action Powell."

Ok. See post 96.
98 posted on 12/18/2002 1:21:48 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Don Nickles is the likely next Majority Leader of the US Senate...I've thought so for a long time, predating this mess...and I will stand by it until it plays out.

My apologies for forgetting our respectful and friendly interchanges in the past. You have my sincerest regrets.

Good night.

EV
99 posted on 12/18/2002 1:22:14 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Your position is that Blacks were no worse off under segregation than they are now.

Almost right. I said that this time blacks have created it with their eyes wide open and vote to the tune of 95% to keep it that way. The racist is the one that still feels that blacks are incapable of voting their own self-interests and are un-witting dupes. I don't view them that way; they are just as capable of seeing where their advantage lays and they vote accordingly.

100 posted on 12/18/2002 1:23:13 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson