Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lott vows to fight, but support slipping: Many on Capitol Hill see Bush push to replace SML
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, December 18, 2002 | By Joseph Farah

Posted on 12/17/2002 11:47:41 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Edited on 12/18/2002 10:27:09 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON – Trent Lott fans were as scarce as hen's teeth in this town yesterday.

============================================================

Apologies, apologies

Hoping to salvage his candidacy for the Democratic presidential nomination amid growing controversy, Rev. Jesse Jackson apologized Tuesday night on White Entertainment Television for remarks seen as critical of seven-term Democratic Sen. Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia, revered as an icon and elder statesman in his party.

"My comments were hurtful, needlessly opened old wounds and, for this, I sincerely apologize," said Rev. Jackson in the W.E.T. interview, seen as make-or-break for his candidacy.

Jackson's public relations offensive comes as Senate Democrats push to oust incoming GOP Majority Leader Trent Lott over 'racially tinged' remarks at a recent Centennial birthday tribute for retiring GOP Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina. Sen. Lott said fellow Mississippians were proud of casting their vote for Thurmond in 1948 when he ran for president as a Dixiecrat on a segregationist platform, adding that the country, had he won, would be far better off today.

The comments were seized by Democrats to force Lott from the leadership and hopefully from the Senate altogether, making for a 50-50 split and putting Democrats within striking distance of keeping the gavel next month.

Complicating their effort, the Rev. Jackson, in his third run for the nomination, touched off an uproar among party leaders Saturday over comments alluding to Sen. Byrd's past as Grand Kleagle of the Klu Klux Klan, a group with strong roots in the Democratic Party and that Jackson could ill-afford to alienate. Raising the specter of Sen. Byrd could, moreover, open Democrats up to charges of hypocrisy and undermine the drive to topple Sen. Lott, allowing the Senate to fall under GOP control the next session.

"There are things about Sen. Byrd's past I can't say I'm proud of," Rev. Jackson told FOXNEWS Saturday, initially sparking the furor. Pressed if he meant the Senator's past affiliation with the KKK, cautiously Jackson replied: "Well, some might construe it that way, yes -- but that's for others to judge."

Jackson's comments drew sharp rebuke as "insensitive" from the Democratic Congressional White Caucus and the Yellow Dog Democrat Association for the Advancement of White People, influential Byrd bastions both and whose support is crucial to seeking the nomination.

Burris Dunn, president of the National Association of White Colleges and Universities, and a big Byrd supporter, called Jackson's comments "incredibly stupid" and a "mindboggling tactical blunder," handing ammo to Republicans.

"Here we were," he said, "right at the cusp of victory, our party poised to keep the Senate from falling back into Republican hands and along comes that [expletive deleted] Jackson to gum up the works! Unbelievable! The Republican Party, need I remind you, is the party of Lincoln, the moron who freed the slaves, for crying out loud! How disgusting! I mean, think about it: Peter Jennings, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw et al have been very careful, throughout the Lott brouhaha, not to muddy the waters with Sen. Byrd, not even hint on his past dealings, but that idiot [expletive deleted] Jackson has to pop his mouth off!"

Jackson, angering party stalwarts further, refused Saturday to say whether he would seek the endorsement of Sen. Byrd, who was Senate Majority Leader for 12 years. For Democratic presidential hopefuls, receiving the 'Byrd blessing', as party insiders call it, has traditionally been essential to winning the Party's nomination. Eschewing the 'Byrd blessing' would be a controversial break with party tradition and could doom Jackson's chances.

But in his mea-culpa interview last night on W.E.T., Jackson tried to make amends with Sen. Byrd, a former KKK recruiter who once vowed never to serve in an integrated military.

"I want to apologize to Sen. Byrd, whom I've offended," said a humble and contrite Rev. Jackson. "My remarks were totally inappropriate and totally offensive."

Asked if, as an act of contrition, he now plans to seek Byrd's endorsement, Jackson was unequivocal: "Of course I will. Why, I consider it an honor and a privilege just being in the same room with Sen. Byrd, the conscious of the Senate."

The Byrd camp remained unconvinced, however.

"Let me put it to you this way," said a top Byrd staffer, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "If I were Jackson, I sure as heck wouldn't want to be alone in the woods anywhere near Sen. Byrd right now. Not that my boss would ever consider endorsing that [expletive deleted] Jackson, but the total lack of respect he's shown for our party's Grand Kleagle is especially galling."

Aids to Sen. Daschle expressed similar sentiments.

"What the heck is the matter with Jackson, anyway?", one top aid fumed. "Why hand Republicans ammunition like that? What is he, stupid, or what? For weeks, every morning, I pick up the phone and remind Katie Curic and other media mouthpieces of ours not to mention Sen. Byrd, our beloved Grand Kleagle, or risk blowing our phony baloney pro-civil rights cover. Why can't Jackson just keep his piehole shut for once?"

A furious Sen. Ernest Fritz Hollings, Democrat of South Carolina, spoke on the record. "Everybody likes to go to Geneva. A lot of Geneva-ing goin' on out there. I used to do it for the Law of the Seas conferences, and you'd find these potentates from down in Africa, you know, rather than eating each other, they'd just come up and get a good square meal in Geneva."

I reminded him that, not long ago, those very words got him in a heap of trouble with African diplomats. "Oh, C'mon," he shot back. "I was only joking! Right now I'm so hopping mad at that [expletive deleted] Jackson, I could [expletive deleted]. We're so, so close to getting the Senate back! We've got the party of Lincoln, that traitor, scurrying for cover -- on the run like never before! Now that [expletive deleted] Jackson shows up and hands Republicans the loaded gun to kill us!"

I asked Democrat staffers what they thought of the media coverage so far.

"Oh, our people at CNN are doing a wonderful job," one aid said effusively. "At CNN, it's all Lott, all the time. 24/7. They're keeping up the pressure on Republicans. Dittos MSNBC -- all Lott, all the time. Even the Weather Channel is talking about Lott. I heard one forecaster say something like, now for the weather in Mississippi, where that Republican racist hatemonger Lott is from, etc."

And the newspapers?

"In the morning, I pick up the Washington Post, and page one -- all devoted to Lott. Turn to page two, and read more about Lott. Turn to page 3, and read yet more about Lott. Lott this, Lott that, heck, you need to turn all the way to page 15 to see anything about Iraq, Saddam, the War on Terror. hehehe, as a Democrat, it sure feels like hog heaven to me."

Then I broke the bad news to him: The GOP, despite weeks of wall-to-wall negative coverage, hasn't been the least bit tarnished by it. Well over half -- 56% -- view the Republican Party favorably in an ABC News/Washington Post poll just out, while 60% believe the GOP is "committed to equal opportunity for minorities."

But that's not the worse news for Democrats: Even a majority of minorities in the survey -- 52% -- see the Republican Party, despite all the propaganda, as "committed to equal opportunity for minorities."

Ouch! For Dems, that's gotta hurt ;^)

Anyway, that's....

My two cents...
"JohnHuang2"



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: ApesForEvolution
btt
61 posted on 12/18/2002 12:49:13 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
No dear, the voice of a rational, well educated, political savvy person, who has a far above average memory. ;^ )
62 posted on 12/18/2002 12:50:47 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
"No dear, the voice of a rational, well educated, political savvy person, who has a far above average memory. ;^ )"

Who's hitched up to Sir Limp-Lott. I'd say you're slipping...
63 posted on 12/18/2002 12:51:48 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Bush and Powell must apologize to Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell and all American Christians

Which TLB are you, and do you know what thread you're on?




64 posted on 12/18/2002 12:52:08 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
My " insults " ? You called someone else " delsusional ". I called you that. Now, in your twisted lexicon, " MY " insults make me look bad ?

You're just too, too much ! ROTFLMSO

No matter WHAT happens, from here on out, you won't be satified or happy. You seldom are.

65 posted on 12/18/2002 12:53:25 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Hmm, sure sounds like you're hoping that I'll just forget and won't ping this after Lott is out. But, don't worry, I've bookmarked your comments, even if you're afraid to do it yourself.
66 posted on 12/18/2002 12:53:29 AM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
People around here know I carry no brief for Lott, but I think giving in to the race-hustlers/lynch-mob sets a terrible precedent.

My friend, the only one playing footsie with the race-hustlers/lynch-mob is Trent Lott. You need to see this.

The President isn't. Other congressional leaders aren't...at least excepting the usual liberal suspects. And the rank and file of the GOP aren't.

So, if we were to keep Lott...God forbid...would you agree with his hard left turn on Affirmative Action?

Would you be offended by his perpetual 'apologies for what I'm not guilty of world tour'?

Would you be offended if it appeared that he had made himself the slave of Jesse Jackson and Co. because of this situation that HE, and only HE created?

67 posted on 12/18/2002 12:53:54 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: The Great Satan
My goodness, another bloody mind reading expert, I see. Sooooooooooooooooooo, I'm " afraid ", am I ? Not of you, dear.

Neither am I " hoping " that you'll forget this little exchange. As a matter of fact, I hope that you won't forget it !

69 posted on 12/18/2002 12:55:57 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Don't act so innocent. You have never had a decent word to say to me, and your words to me throughout the last few days have been meant to be insulting and demeaning.

Typical of you to whine when someone gives you back your own medicine.
70 posted on 12/18/2002 12:56:35 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; TLBSHOW
I'm sorry, but it's late and that was funny! LOL! BLT, you've got to admit that sometimes, from the outside looking in - you act like you're on meth or something, spamming the same thing 20 times then spamming something else 20 times then spamming something else....and I know what you're saying.
<br.Everything has kind of fallen apart since Bush and Powell started attacking Christians speaking truth about islamotrash. But, that apology probably ain't coming, so buck up.
71 posted on 12/18/2002 12:57:04 AM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
I have known Trent Lott since 1968 when he hit DC as a staffer for Bill Colmer. He got elected the first time in 1972. In 1972 the Democratic liberals tried to take him down by putting him against 12 other candidates in the primary. He out smarted them and won easily.

But in 2002, he's not even smart enough to keep from paying homage to the Dixiecrat campaign?

Next time you see that appeasing, gutless, pander-monkey, former Senate Majority Leader, say "hello" for me.




72 posted on 12/18/2002 12:58:31 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Mrs. Clinton got down to business. She expressed "hope" that she would be named after the New Year as chairman of the Senate Steering Committee—a party-leadership role that will afford her greater involvement in helping to shape the Democratic attack on the G.O.P. leading up to 2004. In reality, Mrs. Clinton is all but certain to get the gig, and her impending appointment is common knowledge. But it has yet to be formally announced, and she has been careful to avoid public discussion of her role.

Mrs. Clinton also said that she would be able to play a bigger role in producing the Democratic response

"This will definitely give her even more of a platform than she already has," said Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner of Brooklyn. "She came in as sort of the outside celebrity Senator, but now, as head of Steering, she’s also going to be a spokesman for her colleagues."

Mr. Weiner predicted that she would play an aggressive role in helping the party do battle for the hearts and minds of the American electorate.

Mr. Weiner said. "I think she learned firsthand the importance of hand-to-hand media combat, and I think she also served in an administration in the 90’s that was masterful in using media to win. We’ve been losing these battles ever since Bill Clinton left the White House."

73 posted on 12/18/2002 12:58:40 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
As a matter of fact, I hope that you won't forget it !

Good, that's why I bookmarked it. Always good to keep track of people's predictions, to see who's on the ball and who's desperately blowing smoke, eh?

74 posted on 12/18/2002 12:59:25 AM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Typical of you to whine when someone gives you back your own medicine.

Tell me..what do you REALLY mean when you say that affirmative action is wrong. Why can't an inference of racism be gleaned from that stance?

75 posted on 12/18/2002 12:59:35 AM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
The only one whining, is YOU, dear. You're also exaggerating mightily ! I have refrained, for almost the entire length of this debakle, from posting on any thread, ANY THREAD , on FR and only have done so for two days.

You are quite mistaken ( lying , as a matter of fact ) in claiming that I have never had a decent word to say to you ever. Your memory is quite faulty.

"Innocent " ? I'm not acting innocent at all. I'm stating a fact. Here's another one...you have slung personal attacks at many people, the entire life of your membership on this forum.

76 posted on 12/18/2002 1:01:09 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
Everything has kind of fallen apart since Bush and Powell started attacking Christians speaking truth about islamotrash. But, that apology probably ain't coming,


you have it correct
77 posted on 12/18/2002 1:01:53 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Oh Barbra Streisand and then some, hot air and smoke blower.
78 posted on 12/18/2002 1:02:33 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
"I have known Trent Lott since 1968 when he hit DC as a staffer for Bill Colmer. He got elected the first time in 1972. In 1972 the Democratic liberals tried to take him down by putting him against 12 other candidates in the primary. He out smarted them and won easily.

Trent is always loyal to his friends and he will indeed screw his enemies. Bush and Rove are going to have to kiss some Mississippi a$$. Lott owns the Bush agenda."

Thank you, thank you, for pointing that out. I feel so good that Trent Lott will screw his enemies, and he now owns the Bush agenda.

However, I think a more accurate statement would be;
"The Democratic Black Caucus now owns Trent Lott." Why else is he sucking up to the Wacky Major John Owens?

Lott & Owens are going to be going on a cruise ship tour of the African slave ship routes, I hear...

And we'll be getting a whole Lott more apologies, I'm sure, for altering the oceans ecology with slaves being dumped overboard, etc.
(Major Owens speech on the House floor...)

79 posted on 12/18/2002 1:03:48 AM PST by FBD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I am on the hate crime one
80 posted on 12/18/2002 1:03:58 AM PST by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson