Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smallpox Comitatus
self ^ | 12/18/02 | Self

Posted on 12/17/2002 11:13:33 PM PST by Joe 6-pack

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last
To: hellinahandcart
My posts seem to be out of order, or maybe it's my brain at this point.
161 posted on 12/23/2002 12:01:13 AM PST by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
Look, it's been pointed out to you many times already that it wasn't his views on the smallpox vaccine that we had a problem with. Nobody denies that there is a very slight chance of reaction to the shot.

However, FL alleged, among other things, that vaccines are not responsible for preventing disease, which is a completely baseless and dangerous assertion to make. He then followed that up with painfully long cut-and-paste spamming that slowed threads down to a crawl. On top of that, he constantly whined to the moderators, sent nasty FReepmails (he sent one to me "go f&*k yourself"), and called everybody who disagreed with him names. And I haven't even gotten in to his crop circle posts.

It was only a matter of time.

162 posted on 12/23/2002 5:44:39 AM PST by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
What did you think of Chelsea?

That she was appropriately dressed for church, and is prettier when she doesn't smile.

There is not much to think about her, really.

163 posted on 12/23/2002 5:45:02 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
If you had ever disagreed with him, you'd be saying "and the a$$hole deserved it."

So the former Former Lurker is now justa lurker, eh?

164 posted on 12/23/2002 7:27:56 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
Then why are some doctors afraid of it?

Because smallpox is a plague of Biblical ferocity that they've only seen in textbooks. Also, normal reactions to vaccination are more traumatic than they're used to seeing.

Here's a good thread...

Smallpox shots sicken some, startling researchers

As physical specimens, the Baylor University students were fit and healthy, the "crème de la crème," in the words of researcher Kathy Edwards. Yet when she inoculated them with smallpox vaccine, arms swelled, temperatures spiked and panic spread.

It was the same at clinics in Iowa, Tennessee and California. Of 200 young adults who received the vaccine in a recent government study, one-third missed at least one day of work or school, 75 had high fevers and several were put on antibiotics because physicians worried that their blisters signaled a serious bacterial infection.

Even for experts such as Edwards, the Vanderbilt University physician overseeing the study, the side effects were startling. "I can read all day about it, but seeing it is quite impressive," she said. "The reactions we saw were really quite remarkable."

President Bush may announce plans, perhaps as early as this week, to resume vaccinating Americans against smallpox as part of a massive push to protect the nation from a biological assault. As he weighs the decision, researchers are becoming reacquainted with the unpleasant — often severe — complications of the vaccine itself.

The experiences in a half-dozen clinical trials offer an early look at what military personnel, hospital workers and other emergency workers will likely encounter if Bush adopts the recommendations of his top health advisers to vaccinate up to 11 million people in the coming months. What is disconcerting, say the people participating in the clinical trials, is that when it comes to smallpox vaccination, what had once been considered ordinary is rather extraordinary by today's standards.

"I just wanted to go to bed for a day or two there," said Alison Francis, a New York University student who received the vaccine. Francis, 24, said she felt tired and achy after getting her shots. Her arm was heavy, warm to the touch and terribly itchy, she said.

Once among the deadliest scourges on Earth, smallpox was declared eradicated worldwide in 1981. But growing hostilities with Iraq and with Osama bin Laden and other terrorists have renewed fears that the virus could be used as a potent, stealthy weapon. Vaccination is surefire protection, but it is risky. For every 1 million people vaccinated, from 15 to 52 will suffer life-threatening consequences such as brain inflammation, and one or two will die, according to historical data. Pregnant women, babies, and people with eczema or weak immune systems should not receive the vaccine.

Federal researchers have been testing the 40-year-old vaccine for its safety and potency. None of the 1,500 volunteers have died or been seriously injured by the vaccine. But even the most mundane cases can be disturbing to doctors and patients unaccustomed to the live virus used in the vaccine and its side effects.

Unlike most modern vaccines, the smallpox vaccine is administered by 15 quick pricks that literally "establish an infection in your skin," said Julie Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. "There is the immediate discomfort of getting poked in the arm and a range of annoying reactions."

Within three to four days, an itchy bump develops, followed by a larger blister filled with pus. In the second week, the blister dries into a scab that usually falls off in the third week. During the three weeks, many people experience flulike symptoms — aches, fever, lethargy — and terrible itchiness.

"You can't scratch it, it's all bandaged up; all I could do was smack it," said Meg Gifford, a University of Maryland junior who participated in one study. She suffered from a slight fever, an arm that was hot to the touch and swollen lymph nodes in her armpit.

"The reactions we are seeing are totally out of line with today's vaccine experience and absolutely in line with historical experience," said Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "In the 30 years since we had routine vaccination, the public's tolerance level has gone way down."

Maryland researchers have begun a second trial revaccinating older adults to see how much immunity stays in the system. Early indications are that people who have been previously inoculated do not suffer as many severe side effects.
LINK




165 posted on 12/23/2002 7:46:53 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
If FR keeps banning people who have strong feelings on issues, or maybe the "wrong" feelings on issues, it's going to be a very boring place. People don't have to agree with everything they hear, but I think banning is going too far.

It had nothing to do with FL's opinions or how strongly he held them. It had everything to do with his manifest inability to conduct himself with even a bare minimum level of civility.

166 posted on 12/23/2002 8:27:22 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
FormerLurker's handle is now PresentLurker :o)
167 posted on 12/23/2002 8:29:58 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: dixie sass
FYI
168 posted on 12/23/2002 9:54:40 AM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; DBtoo
I looked through the things which were linked through the quackwatch site and found this one the most informative. There are two types of infectious disease described here, those which are caused by a bacteria, and those which are caused by a virus. All of the vaccines for bacterial diseased which are considered to be safe and effective are made by taking a toxin or molecule from the surface of the bacteria and giving that to the patient in order to trigger an immune response. The toxin is chemically treated in order to make it safe and turn it to a toxoid. The vaccines for DTaP (Diptheria + tetanus + Pertussis-whooping cough), hepatitis B, Anthrax, Meningococcus, Hib, Pneumococcus, and Lyme disease are all made this way.

The only anti-bacteria vaccine which uses a live bacteria is the TB vaccine which is made from a related bacteria which infects cows. This vacccine is only recommended for children living with someone with TB who cannot treat their disease and is not effective for adolescents.

Of the vaccines which are for diseases caused by a virus, some use a killed virus while others use a live virus which has been weakened and changed by being grown inside a chicken embryo. Hepatitus A, Influenza, Rabies, and the IPV Polio vaccine all involve a killed virus.

The vaccines for Chickenpox-varicella, Yellow Fever, and MMR (Measles + Mumps + Rubella) all use weakened forms of live viruses. The oral polio vaccine used a live virus which was weakened by being grown inside of monkeys. It has been replaced by the IPV polio vaccine which involves a killed virus and is therefore considered safer.

Smallpox is the only vaccine which uses a live virus which is from a related disease which infects cows. It has higher risks than either a killed vaccine, or a vaccine which has a human virus which has been weakened by being grown in chicken embryos. The smallpox vaccine is only recommended if there is a known danger of getting smallpox. It is considered risky to give it to everyone in the absence of a known threat.

169 posted on 12/23/2002 10:36:10 AM PST by ganesha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: ganesha; DBtoo
The smallpox vaccine is only recommended if there is a known danger of getting smallpox. It is considered risky to give it to everyone in the absence of a known threat.

 
Bush Receives Smallpox Vaccination
      Posted by grimalkin
On 12/21/2002 1:13 PM PST with 36 comments


Reuters ^ | Dec. 21, 2002 | Jim Wolf
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush was vaccinated against smallpox on Saturday in his capacity as commander-in-chief of U.S. armed forces and was showing no side effects, a White House spokeswoman said. Eight days ago, Bush announced plans to immunize half a million troops and up to 10 million civilian health care and emergency workers against the long-dormant disease, now deemed a terrorist threat. Doctors began giving the vaccinations on Monday, ahead of a possible U.S.-led war to strip Iraq of any banned chemical, biological or nuclear weapons programs. Bush took the shot in his left arm in the White House...
     
     
Bush Feels 'Fine' After Smallpox Shot
      Posted by Dallas
On 12/22/2002 10:05 AM PST with 11 comments


AP ^
CAMP DAVID, Md. - President Bush (news - web sites) showed no ill effects Sunday from his smallpox vaccination, taking an early morning jog before going to church. On the first day of a long Christmas stay at Camp David, Bush was up at 6:15 a.m. and jogging two hours later. He ran three miles in 21 minutes, 15 seconds. Later, he went to church. Bush is feeling "absolutely, positively fine," said White House spokesman Adam Levine. Experts estimate that 15 out of every 1 million people vaccinated for the first time will face life-threatening complications, and one or two...



170 posted on 12/23/2002 10:56:26 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Admin Moderator; DBtoo
I don't agree with the decision to ban Former Lurker. The effect of banning someone who cares passionately about an issue is often to eliminate all discussion of that issue. For example, I thought that the position of black jade on pipelines being the primary cause of the war in Afghanistan was mistaken. Nonetheless, the oil industry does play a major role in the events of the middle east. Eliminating discussion of that is a loss if that is a subject which you are curious about. The stakes on the smallpox issue are higher and more personal than those on the oil pipeline issue. Former Lurker's position that no vaccine has ever done any good is probably wrong. Nevertheless, I have problems with the Bush administration's position for the following reasons:

1) It has not been proven to me that Iraq has smallpox.
2) It has not been proven to me that Iraq has the means to deliver and deploy smallpox effectively.
3) Because of 1 and 2, the government's response seems based on speculation about what might happen rather than an actual threat.
4) It is not clear to me that cowpox is sufficiently harmless that it's widespread distribution poses no threat.
The fact that vaccination with cowpox was an improvement over variolation with smallpox does not mean it is without risk.
5) It has not been sufficiently explained how cowpox differs from smallpox. I mean this biologically and not just in terms of symptoms.
6) The vaccine is a live virus and not a killed virus.
7) The method of preparing the live virus is not the safest method which is cell culture adaptation which as noted above uses a human virus which has been weakened by being grown in a chicken embryo. Instead it is an unweakened live virus from a related cow disease.
8) If smallpox has been eradicated from the human population then mandatory widespread vaccination could have the effect of reintroducing it in the form of a similar disease.
9) The ratio of public health risks to public health benefits in vaccinating a population in which a disease does not exist is different from the ratio of risks to benefits in vaccination of a population where the disease is already prevalent.
10) The patriot act protects the pharmaceutical industry from being sued if the vaccine causes harm.
171 posted on 12/23/2002 11:15:51 AM PST by ganesha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: ganesha
FormerLurker was not banned due to his stance. He was banned because he had a habit of belittling and insulting anyone who disagreed with his version of Revealed Truth.

If you wish, I will Freepmail you a response to your post in typical FormerLurker fashion.

In short, if you can't play nice...you get sent home.

172 posted on 12/23/2002 11:19:23 AM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: ganesha
There are plenty of anti-vaccine people on FR who don't resort to thread spamming and hurled insults. If anything FL's ban will improve the discussion on the topic. I know there are numerous times I've avoided threads on topics I know interested FL because I didn't feel like getting into the usual BS arguement with him. He didn't discuss anything, he tried to shout people down and when opposed ran crying to moderators and would eventually resort to profanity laiden freepmails.
173 posted on 12/23/2002 11:22:14 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: ganesha
I don't agree with the decision to ban Former Lurker. The effect of banning someone who cares passionately about an issue is often to eliminate all discussion of that issue.

Former Lurker didn't care about the issue, he cared about posing as the Sole Possessor of All Truth, regardless of the lies and tinfoil spam he needed for his narcissism.

Former Lurker's position that no vaccine has ever done any good is probably wrong.

And an absolute menace to public health. Don't forget that.

Nevertheless, I have problems with the Bush administration's position for the following reasons:

1) It has not been proven to me that Iraq has smallpox.

So? Who are you?

2) It has not been proven to me that Iraq has the means to deliver and deploy smallpox effectively.

So? Why did President Bush take the smallpox vaccination booster?

Why did the CDC stockpile 300,000,000 doses of the vaccine?

Why are Europe and the G-7 and Canada and Mexico and Israel and Jordan suddenly interested in immunizing their populations from smallpox?

3) Because of 1 and 2, the government's response seems based on speculation about what might happen rather than an actual threat

Gotcha, "not been proven to me" = "government's response seems based on speculation about what might happen rather than an actual threat."

. 4) It is not clear to me that cowpox is sufficiently harmless that it's widespread distribution poses no threat.
The fact that vaccination with cowpox was an improvement over variolation with smallpox does not mean it is without risk.

Well, since cowpox (or a close relative) was used for almost 200 years with overwhelming benefits to the human race, I don't know what it will take to convince you.

No one's claiming anything is without risk, what we're talking about is lowering risks. Cease the false dilemmas and straw men already.

5) It has not been sufficiently explained how cowpox differs from smallpox. I mean this biologically and not just in terms of symptoms.

Yes it has. Do your homework. One virus is Vaccinia, the other is Variola.

6) The vaccine is a live virus and not a killed virus.

Big deal. As you noted, it's a live virus that's not the same as the one for which we're being immunized.

Since smallpox is more lethal and contagious than most other viruses, it poses a unique risk, and warrants unique solutions if that's all we have.

7) The method of preparing the live virus is not the safest method which is cell culture adaptation which as noted above uses a human virus which has been weakened by being grown in a chicken embryo. Instead it is an unweakened live virus from a related cow disease.

So? The vast, vast majority of those vaccinated come out of it healthy, unscathed, and immunized against smallpox.

Hold your breath, if you like, for a risk-free universe.

8) If smallpox has been eradicated from the human population then mandatory widespread vaccination could have the effect of reintroducing it in the form of a similar disease.

No, scientifically impossible. There has never been a case where one disease has become an already existing disease. This is hysteria. Why not fear that vaccine scars will provide portals for an invasion from another dimension?

Also, we aren't talking about "mandatory," that's a red herring.

9) The ratio of public health risks to public health benefits in vaccinating a population in which a disease does not exist is different from the ratio of risks to benefits in vaccination of a population where the disease is already prevalent.

The vaccine will be voluntary. Wring your hands if you like, while the rest of us provide you with herd immunity.

10) The patriot act protects the pharmaceutical industry from being sued if the vaccine causes harm.

Good. The voluntary vaccine will carry an implicit consent waiver. Cutting through the lawyers and the red tape is a good thing..




174 posted on 12/23/2002 11:43:47 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: FormerLurker; hellinahandcart
Finding The Answer To Washington's Hottest Whodunit

http://aria8.vwh.net/columns/files/120402.html

Do they really expect that people don't know that George Bush Sr. was on the board of directors of Eli Lilly a number of years ago? Or that the phrase, "mad as a hatter" came from a book of Lewis Carrol referring to the well known use (by hat makers in 19th century England) of mercury salts in making the felt of the hats. A couple of years ago, Dr. Ronald Hoffman (WOR 710, New York) had a little talk about thimerosal, that a law had been put in the Federal Register in about 1996 forbidding its further use in vaccines, but that it was still in use in various vaccines as late as 1998. I question how they were allowed to violate this law, much less get this type of immunity to lawsuits, given that it is so well known that mercury is toxic to the nervous system, especially of developing little children. The phrase, "mad as a hatter" comes from Lewis Carrol and the well known use of mercury salts back in England in making (felt) hats, and that the cutaneous absorption of these mercury salts led to varying degrees of damage to the central nervous system. I just don't understand how these people are allowed to be above the law like this, given the fact that they had to know people were being hurt.
175 posted on 01/11/2003 9:35:14 PM PST by Coleus (Hello Ball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson