Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TERROR OF BIN LADEN'S 20 BACKPACK NUKES developing
Drudgereport.com ^ | drudge

Posted on 12/14/2002 4:25:43 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-247 next last
To: InterceptPoint; Squantos; Travis McGee

Isotopes of the Element Beryllium with a Known Natural Abundance

Mass Number Natural Abundance Half-life
9 100% Stable

All Known Isotopes of the Element Beryllium

Mass Number Half-life Decay Mode Branching Percentage
5 No Data Available Proton Emission No Data Available
6 4.96848*10-21 seconds Alpha Decay 100.00
Double Proton Emission No Data Available
7 53.22 days Electron Capture 100.00
8 6.72206*10-17 seconds Alpha Decay 100.00
9 Stable - -
10 1.51*10+6 years Beta-minus Decay 100.00
11 13.81 seconds Beta-minus Decay 100.00
Beta-minus Decay with
delayed Alpha Decay
3.1
12 21.3 milliseconds Beta-minus Decay 100.00
Beta-minus Decay with
delayed Neutron Emission
<= 1.00
13 2.7*10-21 seconds Neutron Emission No Data Available
14 4.35 milliseconds Beta-minus Decay 100.00
Beta-minus Decay with
delayed Neutron Emission
81.00
Beta-minus Decay 5.00

101 posted on 12/14/2002 5:57:58 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Fury
The trigger is tritium which has a half life of 12.3 years, and a usefull life in this application of 8 years.
102 posted on 12/14/2002 6:00:33 PM PST by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Stefan Stackhouse
"There is nevertheless a very real "limited shelf life" issue. My hypothesis is that this might actually be part of the reason why these might end up available on the black market -- the sellers knew that they would be duds without a recharge of fresh tritium."

The shelf life is very limited, not only for the trigger (which is made from beryllium, not tritium), but also from the limited shelf-life of the tritium "booster" as well as the slow decay of the uranium and/or plutonium core (which impacts the critical moment), and finally, the radiation in the entire package has some serious affects on the associated electronic components and conventional explosive chemicals, too.

103 posted on 12/14/2002 6:01:51 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Southack; Squantos
Your interesting post 97 says nothing about /1/ Shelf life of various neutron sources and /2/ Whether old neutron sources result in a dud bomb, or just a bomb which loses a 5 of its effectiveness.

Our military might consider a 20 kiloton device which is going to only obtain a 12 KT yield to be a failure.

Al Queda may not.

104 posted on 12/14/2002 6:03:55 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: babygene
No, tritium is the booster. Beryllium is the trigger.

Beryllium's half-life is 53 days.

105 posted on 12/14/2002 6:04:08 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Beware of arabs wearing garbage cans or turkey fryers on their back.

That's what I'm thinking...

106 posted on 12/14/2002 6:04:44 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: PianoMan
Osama is still pushing up the daisies

It is interesting that this silly story
reappeared just after the one year anniversary of his death.


107 posted on 12/14/2002 6:07:13 PM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I meant "which loses a % of its effectiveness".
108 posted on 12/14/2002 6:07:31 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
"Your interesting post 97 says nothing about /1/ Shelf life of various neutron sources and /2/ Whether old neutron sources result in a dud bomb, or just a bomb which loses a 5 of its effectiveness."

Sorry about that, I had to go find a second source for the half-life information.

Roughly 53 days for the Berrylium trigger and about 12 years for the tritium booster.

Whether it fizzles or blows after those times are up would depend upon the speed of the projectile/trigger inside the gun-type weapon, along with some shape/form/purity questions (of the core as well as of the trigger), presuming that the electronics were still functional and that the conventional explosives were still viable after prolonged exposure to massive doses of radiation and shock, et al.

109 posted on 12/14/2002 6:08:52 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: Stefan Stackhouse; All
My apologies for not clarifying. I was responding to the general statement about the limited operational life of certain components, and not specific timeframes for when a component may have its operational capabilities degraded due to a component degradation or failure.
111 posted on 12/14/2002 6:28:02 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The question is whether it'll fit in the overhead or whether you have to check it.
112 posted on 12/14/2002 6:34:10 PM PST by Lx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: big ern
It wouldn't surprise me if we were nuked very soon. Things are coming down to the wire. Probably NYC will be first, because it contains the most Jews and commerce, but you never know.

I like Bush's tough talk and hope he will avenge our deaths if need be.

113 posted on 12/14/2002 6:37:10 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

What's your source on the beryllium trigger. It does not match my experience with nucler weapons.
114 posted on 12/14/2002 6:37:23 PM PST by babygene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: big ern
So they give nukes to dead guys. Not very smart.
115 posted on 12/14/2002 6:42:08 PM PST by Russell Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: go star go
Have you forgotten Putin is KGB?
116 posted on 12/14/2002 6:47:07 PM PST by wharfrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Maybe the Russians are invading the Chinese.
117 posted on 12/14/2002 6:59:27 PM PST by PianoMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Yawn.
118 posted on 12/14/2002 7:00:03 PM PST by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stefan Stackhouse
al-Qaeda's access to your friendly neighborhood Paki nuke scientist is a very real scenario regardless of the ultimate origin of the weapon.
119 posted on 12/14/2002 7:14:43 PM PST by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Dec31,1999
Good God, dont be so cheerful about it! </sarcasm
120 posted on 12/14/2002 7:31:12 PM PST by Minutemen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson