Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack; Squantos
Your interesting post 97 says nothing about /1/ Shelf life of various neutron sources and /2/ Whether old neutron sources result in a dud bomb, or just a bomb which loses a 5 of its effectiveness.

Our military might consider a 20 kiloton device which is going to only obtain a 12 KT yield to be a failure.

Al Queda may not.

104 posted on 12/14/2002 6:03:55 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee
I meant "which loses a % of its effectiveness".
108 posted on 12/14/2002 6:07:31 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee
"Your interesting post 97 says nothing about /1/ Shelf life of various neutron sources and /2/ Whether old neutron sources result in a dud bomb, or just a bomb which loses a 5 of its effectiveness."

Sorry about that, I had to go find a second source for the half-life information.

Roughly 53 days for the Berrylium trigger and about 12 years for the tritium booster.

Whether it fizzles or blows after those times are up would depend upon the speed of the projectile/trigger inside the gun-type weapon, along with some shape/form/purity questions (of the core as well as of the trigger), presuming that the electronics were still functional and that the conventional explosives were still viable after prolonged exposure to massive doses of radiation and shock, et al.

109 posted on 12/14/2002 6:08:52 PM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson