Skip to comments.
Transport Secretariat calls for ban on U.S. trucks in
Mexico (NAFTA)
TheNewsMexico.com ^
| Dec. 14, 2002
| EFE
Posted on 12/14/2002 5:43:23 AM PST by madfly
![](/images/top_printer.gif) ![](http://www.thenewsmexico.com/images/noticias/121402-mx-pol-12.jpg ) |
![](/images/noticias/121402-mx-pol-12.jpg) |
![](/images/blank.gif) |
![](/images/blank.gif) |
U.S. trucks line up to cross the border. Mexican transport officials are urging the government to place a ban on commercial vehicles from the United States. File Photo, TheNewsMexico.com
|
Transport Secretariat calls for ban on U.S. trucks in Mexico EFE - 12/14/2002
MEXICO CITY - The Transportation Secretariat here on Friday urged the Economy Secretariat to ban U.S. trucks from Mexico in response to the United States' refusal to allow Mexican trucks on its highways.
According to the local press, Transportation Secretary Pedro Cerisola said "the privileges of U.S. truck drivers can be suspended" under Article 2019 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
In a Dec. 10 letter to Economy Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez, Cerisola explained the reasons for his displeasure with the current situation regarding trucks.
On Jan. 26, a NAFTA arbitration panel issued a ruling favorable to Mexico, urging the United States to allow Mexican trucks into the country, but the White House refused to accept this, citing safety concerns.
The U.S. decision, Cerisola said, "contains discriminatory elements" against Mexican truckers.
On Nov. 27, the United States gave the green light for Mexican trucks to travel its highways beginning in 2003, subject to safety inspection, proof of insurance and maintenance contracts with U.S. providers, and the testing of drivers for drugs and alcohol.
Currently, Mexican trucks are allowed on U.S. highways only within a strip extending 35 kilometers (21 miles) from the border.
According to Washington's figures, 4.3 million trucks crossed the U.S.-Mexico border last year. |
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2003; freetrade; jan1; mexico; nafta; ustrucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I don't know what you mean by "President Bush blocked this".
To: Steve Eisenberg
As for illegal entry into the U.S., only police states stop people from getting out. It is our job to defend our borders -- don't blame Mexico.Well of course. Let's not blame poor Mexico. It's not like Mexico is a corrupt nation run by the wealty elite. It's not like these wealty elite sit back and laugh at America's situation as millions of their problems are exported northbound. As one of the worlds biggest suppliers of illegal drugs, The Mexican government take steps to make sure that their tons of illegal drugs don't make their way into our country.
Thanks you Mexico for being such a good neighbor. I know we have failed to protect our side of the borders, but America wants to thank you for being such a good, honest neighbor and helping the situation and doing your part.
To: madfly
"On Jan. 26, a NAFTA arbitration panel issued a ruling favorable to Mexico, urging the United States to allow Mexican trucks into the country, but the White House refused to accept this, citing safety concerns."Gee...where are all the hystericals who screamed and ranted and raved that GW was allowing Mexican trucks accross our borders AND SELLING US OUT SELLING US OUT SELLING US OUT??
To: Steve Eisenberg
"Why shouldn't they want this, if they thought that it had a chance? It's called peaceful pursuit of the national interest. If they do it and we don't, who is at fault? Us"I hope I misunderstood your meaning in that statement.
It's not OUR responsibility to do ANYTHING for Mexico. It's a sovereign country. Their country is THEIR responsibility.
To: cake_crumb
Yes, GW saved us from this titanic invasion. He has done so much to secure our borders our sovereignty and our security. Thank you Mr. President, I sincerely thank you. Oh, and the dress Laura's was wearing last weekend was gorgeous.
To: Joe Hadenuf
Did you know that every living former president of Mexico is getting $5 million dollars a year ---ten times what former US presidents receive? Meanwhile 50 millions Mexicans can't make even $5 a day. I don't see how this retirement pay is close to being justified ---especially since everyone of them took off with millions or billions of dollars before leaving the country.
26
posted on
12/14/2002 9:36:26 AM PST
by
FITZ
To: Ben Ficklin
When the yearly take-home pay for truck drivers hits $12,000 a year, they'll just be more jobs that Americans no longer want to do, anyway.
Oh well, there's still plenty of high paying jobs for these former, American, truck drivers in the construction trades. Aren't there?
;^)
27
posted on
12/14/2002 9:38:58 AM PST
by
4Freedom
To: FITZ
Scary isn't it. Like I said, we live next to one of the most corrupt countries on the face of the earth.
To: Joe Hadenuf
"Yes, GW saved us from this titanic invasion. He has done so much to secure our borders our sovereignty and our security. Thank you Mr. President, I sincerely thank you. Oh, and the dress Laura's was wearing last weekend was gorgeous."Well said...and yes it was. Then again, Laura Bush manages to look like a million bucks whatever she's wearing...while some OTHER women (no need to name the crusty one) who preceded her in the White House look like white trash even if they're wearing a million dollar pantsuit. <G>
To: 4Freedom
If and when the mexican truck drivers get here, the Teamsters will organize them.
To: miner89
Mexico has a race horse in charge of their transportation program? Yeah, I hear he's a real stud.
31
posted on
12/14/2002 10:04:14 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Ben Ficklin
A large percentage, if not the majority, of semi-drivers in the Los Angeles area ARE Mexicans. Does not matter where the truck is registered (and both countries are represented);
the trucks are below standard and the driving is scary,
safety checks are "racist",
freeways around the harbor are littered with lost parts,
and there have been efforts at unionizing as independents.
(I have this recurring vision of two impoverished mexicans watching an American truck go down their dirt trail and complaining about the "Gringo invasion".)
32
posted on
12/14/2002 10:14:32 AM PST
by
norton
To: norton
You are describing Texas. It is intersting to note that CA claims to have inspected the mexican trucks down to where they are no worse than US trucks. They are equally and uniformly bad.
Part of the safety program of mexican trucks allows US inpectors to go onto the yards of those mexican truck companies that are permitted in the US and inspect up to half of the trucks. In Texas, inspetors are not allowed to inpect at the yard of Texas companies. The must wait and random inspect on the roads.
To: Ben Ficklin
A lesson that I learned, while I was working my way through college, is the Teamsters will cut their membership's throats.
Members pay the teamsters a flat rate per month not a percentage of what they make. The more employees the companies can hire, the more dues that the Teamsters get.
I witnessed a Teamster's Local allow their member's wages to be negotiated way down and the companies able to force old full-timers, that were at top-rate, out and replace them with a larger number of starting-rate employees.
The new contract made it very unattractive for new hirees to consider this line of work as a career, anymore.
The employers concentrated on hiring students that were looking to finance their education, so they could pursue other careers.
A very small percentage of these students ever stuck around long enough to make top-rate under the new contract.
The Teamsters collected more dues.
The Employers saved labor costs.
The union members got the royal shaft.
34
posted on
12/14/2002 10:31:24 AM PST
by
4Freedom
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
18 - "I'm glad President Bush blocked this. "
blocked what??????????
1 - "On Nov. 27, the United States gave the green light for Mexican trucks to travel its highways beginning in 2003, subject to safety inspection, proof of insurance and maintenance contracts with U.S. providers, and the testing of drivers for drugs and alcohol."
35
posted on
12/14/2002 11:55:39 AM PST
by
XBob
To: Joe Hadenuf
18 - "I'm glad President Bush blocked this. "
blocked what??????????
1 - "On Nov. 27, the United States gave the green light for Mexican trucks to travel its highways beginning in 2003, subject to safety inspection, proof of insurance and maintenance contracts with U.S. providers, and the testing of drivers for drugs and alcohol."
36
posted on
12/14/2002 11:59:34 AM PST
by
XBob
To: madfly
unstated or perhaps unforseen when nafta was passed, china is taking away mexican jobs. tijuana used to have the largest assembly of televisions in the world, but now those relatively-high labor jobs are moving to china.
so...count on mexicans to continue coming to the states.
37
posted on
12/14/2002 12:03:22 PM PST
by
koax
To: Ben Ficklin
Last month, the U.S. government announced the end to a moratorium and said it will open its borders to Mexican trucks starting in 2003, but with restrictions. The trucks will only be allowed to enter the United States after passing safety inspections, obtaining insurance and when carrying maintenance records from U.S. firms. In addition, drivers will have to submit to drug and alcohol tests.
According to the Mexican government and Canacar, which represents 4,500 companies and 32,000 independent truckers, the requirements are "discriminatory."
Canacar statistics indicate that only 30,000 of the 140,000 trucks it represents currently meet the U.S. requirements
38
posted on
12/14/2002 12:16:33 PM PST
by
XBob
To: XBob
The buses are already on our highways: Here's one bus line that is traveling throughout the US:
http://www.estrellablanca.com.mx/
Click on International and you'll see the routes they have all over the US.
39
posted on
12/14/2002 12:16:35 PM PST
by
FITZ
To: Joe Hadenuf; XBob
MEXICO CITY - The Transportation Secretariat here on Friday urged the Economy Secretariat to ban U.S. trucks from Mexico in response to the United States' refusal to allow Mexican trucks on its highways.
[First sentance. Bush was obligated to carry out NAFTA agreements already made. But does this not mean he is blocking implimentation with red tape?]
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson