Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/13/2002 1:09:02 PM PST by Heartlander2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Heartlander2
Great read. Thanks!
2 posted on 12/13/2002 1:13:07 PM PST by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Good post. Thanks.
3 posted on 12/13/2002 1:13:21 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
I think that's what we are all hoping is the case and, until someone has something convincing or we act in opposition to it, I'm going to believe.
4 posted on 12/13/2002 1:16:10 PM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
5 posted on 12/13/2002 1:16:21 PM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
100% Exactly.

What's more, it's his job under the Constitution.
6 posted on 12/13/2002 1:20:15 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Gee, this Canadian GETS IT!!! How many Americans don't get it?

Depending on weather patterns, great chunks of Ontario, quebec and Atlantic provinces are downwind of Chicago, Detroit, NYC, Boston, etc. That makes them liable to whiffs of bio and nuke clouds. They probably haven't thought of that yet...
7 posted on 12/13/2002 1:23:05 PM PST by RandyRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
If terrorists armed with box cutters could kill 3,000 in a morning, what might they do with nuclear, chemical or biological weapons? That is the question that has consumed the Bush White House for the past 15 months. Facing it has to mean facing Mr. Hussein, the only man who has actually used weapons of mass destruction in war.

Well, that's part of it, but not nearly the main part. Think about it: now that Afghanistan has been neutralized, who are the three biggest supporters of anti-Western terrorism in the world?

I would say Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia.

Each of them shares a long border with Iraq. Once we occupy Iraq, we have all three within a very short reach of a substantial American force. Iraq is a pawn (OK, maybe a bishop) that just happens to be sitting on a very useful square.

8 posted on 12/13/2002 1:23:30 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Right on!
9 posted on 12/13/2002 1:26:04 PM PST by RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Clearly this article makes all the assumtions that are driving our opinion of what Presidnet Bush seeks for America and its allies. Good Post.
10 posted on 12/13/2002 1:27:18 PM PST by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
I dont think anyone hear would disagree that Sadam Hussein is a threat...
or that if you want to kill a snake "it would be prudent" to cut off its head
Its when one is dealing with a hydra that one must be more vigourous
11 posted on 12/13/2002 1:34:21 PM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
About 75 per cent of the public in France, 54 per cent in Germany and 44 per cent in Britain think it's "all about oil."

For them it is all about oil. Where would France get its oil otherwise? What these countries are afraid of is being more beholden to the USA. After Bush opens a case of Texas whoopass on Iraq, these countries will have to deal with the USA in one form or another for their oil.

12 posted on 12/13/2002 1:51:04 PM PST by VRW Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
A slight correction:

"Mr. Hussein, the only man LIVING who has actually used weapons of mass destruction in war.

To which I toast President Truman, who did the right thing.

13 posted on 12/13/2002 2:08:16 PM PST by Uncle Miltie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
I just thanked Mr Gee. You can reach him at
mgee@globeandmail.ca
14 posted on 12/13/2002 2:11:48 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Outstanding!
15 posted on 12/13/2002 3:10:32 PM PST by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Bump!
16 posted on 12/13/2002 3:17:05 PM PST by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Excellent article. I, too, have emailed the author to thank him.
17 posted on 12/13/2002 3:20:45 PM PST by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Heartlander2
Why is George W. Bush so determined to get rid of Saddam Hussein? There are all sorts of popular theories, none of them very flattering to the President -- and none very convincing, either.

Indeed. If only all those wacky nay-sayers were smart enough to sharpen up their Occam's Razors.

19 posted on 12/13/2002 3:51:19 PM PST by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson