Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOTT SAID IT BEFORE (Drudge Siren)
Drudge ^ | 12/10/02 | Drudge

Posted on 12/10/2002 6:58:42 PM PST by walrus954

After a fiery speech by Thurmond at a Mississippi campaign rally for Ronald Reagan in November 1980, Lott, then a congressman, told a crowd in Jackson: "You know, if we had elected this man 30 years ago, we wouldn't be in the mess we are today."

More to follow...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: lott; thurmond
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 541-543 next last
To: Mo1
Not necessarily. This could be some sort of Tourette's thing.

But the consequences of being held to a higher standard is that sometimes you gotta live it. And that higher standard may simply be having the moral courage to recognize that one's leadership ability has gone to ZERO.
221 posted on 12/10/2002 8:16:24 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
That ad will KILL us.

You weenie. If Bush whips Hussein, and the economy is growing, nobody's going to listen to a bunch of race pimps.

If Lott goes, he will GO, completely, because of the humiliation.

Then we're back to power sharing with Daschle, and having to listen to to all you clowns bellyaching about how wimpish the GOP Senators are.

They're not wimps.

YOU'RE the wimp.

222 posted on 12/10/2002 8:16:56 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I'm not a huge fan of Lott either, but this has turned into a political witch-hunt.

Hey Drudge, where's all the past skeletons from Byrd? Clinton? Any other elected official???? This whole thing just makes me sick and reeks of a media witch hunt to make the Republicans look like the racists that the Dems keep saying we are! I'm astounded at how many people want Lott to roll over and take it up the arse when what we need to be doing is fighting back against this crap. It happened with Newt. And you think we'd learn from the past.

Apparently not. The reason that the Dems keep using the Republicans are racists card is because WE LET THEM!

223 posted on 12/10/2002 8:17:42 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I will "give it a rest" when I feel like "giving it a rest". Thank you very much! I didn't realize that you were the posting police.
224 posted on 12/10/2002 8:18:00 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Swallow his pride for the good of his party? What kind of dumbass are you?

Uh oh... namecalling?

Okay... Let me tell you what kind of a dumbass I am. I am the kind of dumbass who expects my party leaders to behave graciously at public functions.

I am the kind of dumbass who expects good Republicans to do the right thing. When they screw up to that degree, hurting their party, they should accept responsibility and step down.

I am the kind of dumbass who doesn't want to see my party "going Clinton;" kowtowing to idiotic screw-ups in the name of power.

I am the kind of dumbass who would expect a screw-up to turn around and do right by his party, after inflicting such a major wound on it.

225 posted on 12/10/2002 8:18:06 PM PST by Darling Lili
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Yes, sadly, had Russert not injected Lott's stupidity into the public scene, this wouldn't be an issue. But, now it is, and Lott needs to step aside from GOP Leadership (as if he *ever* should have been there in the first place).
226 posted on 12/10/2002 8:18:17 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ApesForEvolution
And if Lott not only steps down but leaves, are we really worse off in the big picture?

Yes.

Even asking the question reveals a significant political stupidity.

227 posted on 12/10/2002 8:18:56 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: puroresu
I am assuming that Frist headed the Senate Campaign Committee. If so, he is a helluva politician.
228 posted on 12/10/2002 8:20:00 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: BuddhaBoy
Exactly. To the letter.
229 posted on 12/10/2002 8:20:56 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
It would give Tommy Daschle another two years to convince the world that he's a blithering idiot.
230 posted on 12/10/2002 8:21:17 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Yes, but Lott is the one who stepped into it.
231 posted on 12/10/2002 8:21:20 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Sounds OK to me.
232 posted on 12/10/2002 8:21:56 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: GopherIt
I dislike Lott as much as the next person. I just don't think I will jump on the Democrat wagon of "let's get him" because they say so. Pot meet Kettle...IMO!
233 posted on 12/10/2002 8:22:04 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
And yes, I know we're not as bad as the democrats with their former Kkue Klux Klan Byrd, or former racist Hollings, but we have higher standards to uphold than democrats.

For what purpose? To keep blacks from voting 98% democrat instead of 97%? The "outrage" on this forum smells more like opportunistic lynching to me.

234 posted on 12/10/2002 8:22:28 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Don't let the Dems play you :-)

I don't think I am, habs. His comment really pissed me off.

235 posted on 12/10/2002 8:22:36 PM PST by Darling Lili
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
It would give Tommy Daschle another two years to convince the world that he's a blithering idiot.

Why would Tom Daschle need to convince anybody that he is an idiot, it's self evident.

236 posted on 12/10/2002 8:23:09 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I agree, If Lott has to go... It has to be on our terms, Not the RATS. For us to roll over for the left on this issue is far more spineless than anything Trent Lott has ever done. To hell with the Liberals who want Lott gone.
237 posted on 12/10/2002 8:23:21 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
The "outrage" on this forum smells more like opportunistic lynching to me.

You caught a whiff of that too?

Stinks, don't it?

238 posted on 12/10/2002 8:24:11 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
For what purpose? To keep blacks from voting 98% democrat instead of 97%?

How about to DO what is actually right?

This is a moral issue, even if it's only about Lott being a blithering idiot, because he promised to do good things for the GOP and he isn't doing them because of his stupid comments.

239 posted on 12/10/2002 8:24:17 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I disagree. Lott's absence creates a leadership vacuum which should be filled with a much better leader that will take the GOP to another, higher level.
240 posted on 12/10/2002 8:24:44 PM PST by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 541-543 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson