Skip to comments.
Bills could end child support payments from men who aren't biological dads
MLIVE.com ^
| The Associated Press
Posted on 12/09/2002 9:04:51 AM PST by BuddhaBoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-199 next last
To: Mamzelle
BB has posted more than these two on this subject, and other interesting threads with the theme of Those D@mned Women. No, dear. That is YOUR INTERPRETATION of my comments. I think I remanded you previously for having no sense of humor.
You bear that out today. you, you, you,.........MAN-BASHER.
ROTFLMAO!
To: BuddhaBoy
bump
To: Mamzelle
What ad hominem? Check back through the thread for names hurled at me, to which I am sanguine (except for that Lott shot). The internet can be a boisterous place. Instead of commenting on the article you direct your comment at BB's rationale for posting it. Plainly, the implication was that he was some sort of woman-hater. Certainly, there have been attacks directed at you, but I believe your post was the opening salvo.
143
posted on
12/09/2002 11:42:54 AM PST
by
Smogger
To: Smogger
Why shouldn't the rationale for beginning several threads on the same subject, and similar subjects, be a matter of discussion?
To: BuddhaBoy
Well, Trent Lott has no sense of humor, either.
To: Mamzelle
I have psychoanalyzed you from your posts. It doesnt look good
Do you want me to freepmail the results to you?
To: babygene
I'm flattered at your interest, but bored with your choice of subject.
To: babygene
Seriously, from one Freeper to another, you really should just stop.
As a Conservative, It does no good for you to marginalize yourself here. Just try to be more fair in the future. Have a nice day.
To: Mamzelle
You're making a mountain out of a molehill. I have observed that many members of FR have issues to which they are particularly attached. Some only post on threads pertaining to that subject. Perhaps you should go to the WOD threads if you want to analyze single-minded people; there are members there that I never see anywhere else. There's nothing wrong with that.
To: babygene
Sorry, that was meant for you-know-who. Not you.
To: alpowolf
No mountain. Just a molehill of a question--what's all this about?
To: Mamzelle
Well, you've gotten plenty of answers. You might consider letting it go.
It's possible that you have an interesting opinion about the subject of the thread--perhaps you should share it.
To: BuddhaBoy
Did you read the article? This stuff is happening mostly in married couples, not just singles.
Well, I did read the article and it gave two examples - one married and one not married - so I would say it is happening in both.
As to the post concerning abstinance - it was a very good one. Had the married woman in the example only had sex within the marriage - the situation could not have occurred.
> I personally advise men to avoid marriage at all costs, because it (along with parentage) provide the state with all the nessesary means to enslave him
Do you also advise them to avoid sex at all costs - because you see with sex comes the chance of parentage - and the man is just as responsible as the woman for a child. Granted the woman is the one who is pregant, but the man is responsible, also. So along with 'don't get married' should come 'don't have sex'. Because babies don't come from being married - they come from sex.
153
posted on
12/09/2002 12:11:15 PM PST
by
nanny
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Sometimes you pay to do what's right. :-(
To: nanny
Do you also advise them to avoid sex at all costs - because you see with sex comes the chance of parentage You should read more of my posts.
To: PayrollOffice
Give the support-paying non-biological dad the option of full custody of the child. He as already bonded with the child, and the child should be taken away from the defrauding mother for the his/her benefit. The defrauding mom should have to pay child support to the father.Now that ain't a bad idea and I'm a woman. I know that too many men don't really want custody of kids but decent men that do should get them, especially in instances like this.
156
posted on
12/09/2002 12:25:34 PM PST
by
mafree
To: Mamzelle
--sure are a lot of enraged cuckholds on this forum!Glad you're so amused by this. When you've been cheated on in your marriage, why don't you come back and discuss it then. If anything, you sound a lot like my ex-wife: a reprehensible human being.
To: mafree; Mamzelle
Thank you both for the cordial responses.
If something like that happened to me, I would want custody of the children. Even if one of them were not mine and I'd been duped.
To: BuddhaBoy
You should read more of my posts.I will confess that with the exception of a few subjects, I have no idea how anyone stands on FR. So forgive me if I did not know anything about your previous posts. Each thread stands on its own. This isn't an insult - I just don't know.
So - do you suggest men refrain from sex also?
159
posted on
12/09/2002 12:31:54 PM PST
by
nanny
To: crystalk
Other studies show that 5% of all IN wedlock births, the father is not the husband. Milkman, Mailman, etc jokes are too true to be funny any more. I found this out when I was pregnant! My blood type is Rh-. My husband also has Rh- blood. The Dr STILL wanted to give me a rhogam shot. Just in case. It was his policy.
160
posted on
12/09/2002 12:35:52 PM PST
by
Dianna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson