Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Individualism, Islam and the Leftist Insurrection
PipeBombNews.com ^ | December 5, 2002 | William A. Mayer

Posted on 12/05/2002 9:09:46 AM PST by johnqueuepublic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
This one is a keeper, Mayer nails this one.
1 posted on 12/05/2002 9:09:46 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
Thanks for posting this outstanding article.
2 posted on 12/05/2002 9:11:02 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
You are welcome, Anne, this guy has been cranking good stuff out like for years.
3 posted on 12/05/2002 9:16:15 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
Thanks for finding posting this great article. I have just book marked it.
4 posted on 12/05/2002 9:28:44 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is a great article and ties in with your constant reminder to us about the dangers of Gramsci and his communistic rantings.
5 posted on 12/05/2002 9:30:03 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Thanks gramps.
6 posted on 12/05/2002 9:45:19 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
I've been reading him for a couple of years.
7 posted on 12/05/2002 9:45:23 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
bump for later reading
8 posted on 12/05/2002 9:47:53 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Clash of Civilizatio
Indexing.
9 posted on 12/05/2002 9:55:15 AM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Good on you!
10 posted on 12/05/2002 9:55:34 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny
????
11 posted on 12/05/2002 9:56:00 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
Ditto everyone above. This guy hits the bullseye. Bump for reference.
12 posted on 12/05/2002 9:58:18 AM PST by PLOM...NOT!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic


Article by Yashiko Sagamori, Candidate for Secretary of
State of California

Yashiko Sagamori 6 nov 2002

Have you ever thought that, in the unfolding conflict between the
Muslim world and the
civilization, the Muslims behave much more logically than the West?

If I believe that you are unlawfully occupying, let's say, an island
that's rightfully mine, I will send
troops to that island. Their purpose will be to suppress any
military resistance your army can
offer, and re-establish my ownership over that piece of land. There
is absolutely no need for
me to target civilians in such a conflict: from any prospective, it
would be not just immoral, but
totally counterproductive vis-a-vis my goals in the conflict.

Jihad however is not about territories. It is about a way of life.
If I wanted to destroy your way of
life, going after your military installations would be largely
futile, especially if your military might
is a billion times greater than anything I can ever dream of. Your
army, no matter how
powerful, is only a tiny portion of your way of life. Blowing up an
office building full of so called
"innocent civilians" advances my cause much farther and much more
convincingly (especially
if it causes you to engage in soul-searching instead of
exterminating me once and forever
which you are perfectly capable of accomplishing) than killing the
same number of military
personnel, precisely because those civilians are the most important,
irreplaceable components
of the way of life I am trying to destroy. Their "innocence" is
non-existent. The term is nothing
but an absurd euphemism for their absurd inability to defend
themselves. Think about it: how
can an infidel be innocent? Isn't it an obvious contradiction in
terms?

If you think I am being sarcastic, read the previous paragraph
again: I am only trying to explain
how the enemy's mentality is better suited for the conflict than
ours.

During WWII, when the very survival of our civilization was in
question (although not as acutely
as it is now), the United States treated enemy civilians in a more
reasonable manner than our
current impotent, defeatist morality dictates. Hiroshima and
Nagasaki were destroyed along
with most of their 100% civilian population despite the fact that
they had not a single military
installation in either of them. As a result, Japan surrendered. As a
result, lives of about a
million American soldiers were spared, along with probably four or
five times that many
Japanese, most of them civilians. Conclusion: Japan should not have
put the United States in
a position where even humanitarian gestures would be so murderous
for the Japanese.

In recent times, Israel is being daily penalized for killing
Palestinian "civilians". Nothing can be
more absurd, considering that "Palestinian people" didn't even exist
until after the Six Day War,
when that shameful misnomer was assigned to the largest and most
successful terrorist
organization in history. An Arab on the way to glorious martyrdom
remains an unarmed
civilian until he or she straps the explosives to his or her body.
People who organize terrorist
acts are considered unarmed civilians until their affiliation with a
terrorist organization is
proven, preferably in court. Women that lured 13 Israeli soldiers
into a murderous trap in Jenin
were perfectly unarmed civilians. Louis Farrakhan and his army are
considered unarmed
civilians. Mosques, those foreposts of Jihad spread around the
United States and Europe, are
considered off limits as religious institutions.

By the way, a religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most
probably cause wide
spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However,
the religious cult that
demands human sacrifices on the global scale -- conversion,
enslavement, or extermination of
all "infidel" everywhere in the world -- is respectfully classified
as a "monotheistic religion" and
"Abrahamic faith". In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily
disguised as a saint.

We are doomed to destruction unless we start treating Islam the way
we did Nazism. I am not
calling for an anti-Muslim genocide: our decisive victory in WWII
was achieved without
exterminating the Germans. Instead, we exterminated Nazism. Today,
we have no choice but
to exterminate the most murderous ideology that has ever existed --
Islam.

I see many parallels between today's world and the situation at the
beginning of WWII. With the
sole exception of Great Britain, not a single government tried to
oppose Hitler. If Hitler had not
betrayed Stalin, the Soviet Union would've had no reason to oppose
him either. Contrary to
the popular myth, the United States did not enter the war to stop
the Holocaust: they did it to
prevent Stalin from going all the way to the Channel and creating
the European Union a few
decades prematurely.

Today, Muslims invade civilized countries under the benign guise of
immigration. Their
influence in Europe and even in the United States is growing
steadily and will continue to do so
unopposed until we finally wake up, although it's hard to tell if
we're ever going to do it in time
to save ourselves. Hypnotized by our own impotent dogmas, we
stubbornly refuse to
recognize the never-ending Arab was against Israel, the September
11, the war in Chechnya,
the terrorist acts in various parts of the world for what they are:
individual fronts of steadily
growing Jihad, whose openly stated purpose is to destroy our
civilization and establish the rule
that would make Taliban look helplessly liberal. So far, they are
winning.
13 posted on 12/05/2002 10:02:46 AM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PLOM...NOT!
What can be done about the non profits, they are supposed to be politcially inactive but they are always engaging in politics regardless.
14 posted on 12/05/2002 10:04:02 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Really interesting piece, what party was Mr S affilitated with?
15 posted on 12/05/2002 10:08:27 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: johnqueuepublic
Good article.
16 posted on 12/05/2002 10:11:57 AM PST by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
It was a complete detriment to the United States that Joe McCarthy had to work with a gavel and Roy Cohn instead of a chainsaw and a large professional wrestler.
17 posted on 12/05/2002 10:33:04 AM PST by SandfleaCSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandfleaCSC
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed along with most of their 100% civilian population despite the fact that they had not a single military installation in either of them.

Unlike the Germans who separated their large arms manufacturing centers away from civilian populations, the Japanese (especially during the latter years of WWII) manufactured their armaments in an almost cottage industry setting with small plants scattered throughout their civilian population. The Tokyo fire raids were a good example of USAF intentionally trying to cripple Japanese small arms production prior to a mainland invasion. If you want to quote examples of useless civilian slaughter in WWII, names like Coventry, Dresden, and Shanghai should come to mind.
18 posted on 12/05/2002 10:45:20 AM PST by SandfleaCSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Excellent article, joe. The honorable Sagamori knows our enemy well. Drastic actions may well be required from all of us before this is said and done if we are to remain a free people. The socialists and Islamists are equally committed to destroying our way of life.
19 posted on 12/05/2002 11:09:29 AM PST by MoGalahad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MoGalahad
Mogal

What I cant figure out is why they think they can win, we killed the Taliban in Afghanland in about 6 weeks, something the entire Soviet Army couldnt do in years.

And we destroyed Sadams army in about the same time in the Gulf War

These guys have no idea what is in store for them, the Truman battle group 13,000 men strong just left the US shored headed for the Iraq.

Hunker down ragboys you are about to see the mother of all cans of whoopass opened on your sorry Islamic butts.

Can you say EMP weapons??????
20 posted on 12/05/2002 11:17:42 AM PST by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson