Bill O'Reilly & Homosexuality - Tonight on The Factor (O'Reilly, a homodupe, spins out)

Stephen Bennett Ministries ^ | 12/4/2002 | Steve Bennett Ministries

[unspun]

From: Stephen Bennett Ministries Subject: Bill O'Reilly & Homosexuality - Tonight on The Factor

*** MEDIA ALERT ***
Stephen Bennett Ministries Visit www.SBMinistries.org Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2002

Bill O'Reilly Confronts the 'Gay' Issue Again Tonight on The O'Reilly Factor - Fox News Channel Wednesday, Dec. 4th - 8pm & 11pm EST
Special Guest - Dr. Joseph Nicolosi of NARTH
------------------------------------------------------------
You may remember Stephen Bennett's appearance on The O'Reilly Factor on Sept. 3rd of this year. O'Reilly blasted Bennett, a 39 year old national Christian recording artist and former homosexual, as being a 'religious fanatic' and 'idiot.'

Stephen shared with millions his story of deliverance from homosexuality over 10 years ago and salvation in Jesus Christ. Bennett is now married to his wife Irene over 9 years. They are the parents of two little children.

Regarding his faith, new life in Jesus Christ and biblical beliefs that homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of God, O'Reilly verbally slammed Bennett and compared him to the 'hate-filled, Islamic terrorists of 9-11.'

Bill O'Reilly came out in full support of 'gay' special rights in the nation's largest homosexual magazine 'The Advocate' on Sept. 3rd. He gave his endorsement for homosexual adoptions and when pressed, even homosexual marriage.

Tonight, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi of NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) is scheduled to appear on The O'Reilly Factor, discussing his new book 'Preventing Homosexuality' and debating a 'gay' activist. Though NARTH is a 'non-religious' organization, Dr. Nicolosi is his highly respected for his research and contributions in the area of helping men and women overcome their unwanted same-sex attractions.

Please tune in tonight and keep Dr. Nicolosi in your prayers, that he will make a great impact to potentially reach millions, as well as our friend Bill O'Reilly, with three simple truths:

(1) NO ONE is born homosexual;
(2) In most cases has everything to do with childhood; and
(3) Complete change IS completely possible.

[unspun]

More evidence that Bill O'Reilly is fffaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrr from being a social conservative.

O'Reilly has been spun. He has been very, very spun.

[Always Right]

O'Reilly usually has more sense than this. I don't understand why he is so rabidly perverted on this issue.

[eno_]

Well that all depends: I believe free adult men should be able to stick their willies wherever they want to, and I should be free to put my kids in a school that teaches that that is not a good idea.

[LTCJ]

Dr. Nicolosi needs to expose Bill for the "kind of religious guy" that he is. O'Reilly bases his opinion on this issue on his feelings alone. Nicolosi would do well to uncover the lack of underpinning to O'Reilly's position.

[joesnuffy]

O'Reilly usually has more sense than this. I don't understand why he is so rabidly perverted on this issue.

Check his knees for callouses

[j_tull]

Tonight, Dr. Joseph Nicolosi of NARTH (National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality) is scheduled to appear on The O'Reilly Factor...

This guy was on Hannity yesterday with a homo activist. The homo's only argument was an endlessly repeated attempt to discredit the author. Expect more of the same from O'Reilly.

[Clint N. Suhks]

More evidence that Bill O'Reilly is fffaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrr from being a social conservative

Oops, small point of order my friend. No need to qualify the word “Conservative” with any adjectives as the word already encompasses social and economic philosophy. Conservatism absent social construct is called Liberaltarianism.

O’Really is a well known social “liberal,” I’m not sure why Steve Bennett hasn’t made a larger issue of it. O’Really likes to argue with the debate-challenged, that’s why he’s interviewing Dr. Nicolosi. Have pitty for him.

[lavaroise]

Bill O'Reilly came out in full support of 'gay' special rights in the nation's largest homosexual magazine 'The Advocate' on Sept. 3rd. He gave his endorsement for homosexual adoptions and when pressed, even homosexual marriage.

Bill Bill Bill, he needs to go back to Earth and realize what he is fighting for, creating war for a privilege, instead of promoting the defense of rights and the privileging act of making families. Does he believe in abortion and that kids are born in vain too? Just wondering. I hope he gets his arse whiped good.

[EdReform]

Bump and Ping

NARTH

[Clint N. Suhks]

Yea, I heard him too. Nicolosi as are most conservatives don’t have the debating skills the left does, i.e. being able to talk over someone and respond to points at the same time a’la (Begalla, McCauliff, Carville, et al). This homo activist has the skill. I only know of only two conservatives able to debate like the lefty pro’s do, Mark Levin and Ann Coulter. (Maybe Bill Bennett.) Rush, Sean, G.Gordon couldn’t debate their way out of a wet paper bag if they wanted to, how sad for our side.

The pro homo-activist had all the talking points down. NARTH not being recognized by the APA: Only because the APA won’t accept research (regardless of validity) negative to the practice of homosexuality. Ex-Gays being seen in gay bars: Does entering a gay bar make one change their “orientation”, NO. That research points to homosexuality being born that way: Every piece of research “pointing that way” is riddled with flaws, bias, outcome based research, volunteer studies… and on and on.

Too bad conservatives aren’t motivated like the pro homo-activists are to learn the research and debate with enough venom to keep the purveyors of perversion at bay. Sigh!

[robertpaulsen]

"Bill O'Reilly came out in full support of 'gay' special rights"

Well, actually he just came out in favor of gay rights, and maybe the "special" part was support for adding gay to anti-discrimination laws. You can read it for yourself here if you wish.

I think it makes him more of a Libertarian than the tongue-twisting Liberaltarian.

[unspun]

homodupe, n. 1. one who is tricked into believing that homosexuality is normal, natural, and healthy. 2. one who believes that the status of "homosexual" may be acheived by some, for which one is granted special rights as a distinctly protected class of person, to be specially nurtured by society.

[unspun]

I have found libertarianism to be lacking in the areas of responsibility and compassion.

[A2J]

O'Reilly usually has more sense than this. I don't understand why he is so rabidly perverted on this issue.

Maybe he hasn't come out of his own closet?

[A2J]

Check his knees for callouses

Or if his flatulence is completely silent.

[A2J]

Conservatism absent social construct is called Liberaltarianism.

Excellent point.

[A2J]

I think it makes him more of a Libertarian than the tongue-twisting Liberaltarian.

Which explains why libertarians are not true conservatives.

[robertpaulsen]

I'll start by saying I'm not a Libertarian.

But, if there is one thing the Libertarian Party stands for, it's personal responsibility. They absolutely do not believe in government-sponsored social "safety nets". This fact may make them appear dispassionate.

[Hat-Trick]

That research points to homosexuality being born that way: Every piece of research “pointing that way” is riddled with flaws, bias, outcome based research, volunteer studies… and on and on.

All the research I needed about the "being born that way" contention was found when I read what Paul penned in 1st Corinthians 10:13.

Hat-Trick

[Clint N. Suhks]

Any laws written for special status based on ones chosen behavior are indeed special rights, everyone is equal but some are more equal than others.

I think it makes him more of a Libertarian than the tongue-twisting Liberaltarian.

You say tomato and I say Liberal, not an ounce of difference between the two.