Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Battle of Savo Island - Aug 9, 1942 _ U.S. Navy's Worst Defeat
WW2 PACIFIC ^ | Unknown | Unknown

Posted on 12/04/2002 5:37:50 AM PST by SAMWolf

Off Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands

In the summer of 1942, the Japanese had to be stopped in their drive to cut off Australia by severing the US shipping lanes. So far in the Pacific War, the Japanese had destroyed the US battle fleet at Pearl Harbor; destroyed the US Asiatic Fleet in the Philippines; sunk the combined Dutch, British, Australian and American fleet in the East Indies (Java); punished the British fleet in Malaya and Ceylon and pushed the Indian Ocean fleet back to Africa; captured southeast Asia, the Philippines, the resource rich East Indies, and many island chains for defense in the central Pacific, an outpost in the Aleutians in the North Pacific, and Rabaul in the Bismarks in the South Pacific. The southern advance on Australia by way of New Guinea had been stopped by Admiral Fletcher at the Battle of Coral Sea and the eastern Pacific was saved at the Battle of Midway. The Imperial Japanese Navy, even after the losses at Midway, still outnumbered the naval forces of the combined US Pacific and the Australian fleets. The Japanese continued to progress south to isolate Australia.

America had established a Germany first policy. Eighty percent of US military production, shipping and supplies was devoted to the Atlantic Theater against Germany, Italy, and their allies, and to aid England and Russia. US troops had started to arrive in the United Kingdom. The Pacific Theater was divided into North, Central, and South Pacific under command of the Navy (Nimitz) and the Southwest Pacific (Australia to Philippines) under the Army (MacArthur). These areas shared the remaining 15% of war production with the China area.



Battle of Savo Island: "Kako" attacks "Vincennes"

Nimitz had two major war aims in 1942.
. Protect Hawaii and the West Coast of the US with Midway Island as his first line of defense.
. And to protect the shipping lanes to Australia.

The Australian sea lanes were a line from the West Coast and Hawaii to Samoa, Fiji, New Hebrides to Sydney,Australia. The Japanese move down the Solomons would allow them to control the Java Sea and threaten America bases in New Hebrides and Australia itself. Fletcher had reacted immediately to the Japanese occupation of Tulagi where a seaplane reconnaissance base was established and had turned back the invasion force coming around to the south side of New Guinea that faced Australia. He then had to race north to the major sea battle at Midway. During this period, the Marine Corps had been building up forces in New Caledonia south of the New Hebrides. When the Japanese started to build an airfield on Guadalcanal across Savo Sound from their base at Tulagi, the United States felt it had to act before the airfield was completed.



In a photo taken from a Japanese cruiser, searchlights illuminate the U.S. cruiser Quincy, which was the first ship in the group to succumb. She rolled over and sank in 11 minutes.

The Solomons are a double string of eight main islands and many small islands spread along 700 miles of ocean about 1,200 miles northeast of Australia. The island chain runs northwest to southeast with Bougainville in the northwest, New Georgia in the middle and Guadalcanal in the southeast. Fighting for New Guinea is going on 700 miles to the west. Guadalcanal is 92 miles long and 33 miles wide and 700 miles southeast of Rabaul on New Britain. New Britain is part of the Bismarck Island chain which is a northwest extension of the Solomons. The waters between the Solomon Islands is called The Slot. Immediately north of Guadalcanal at a distance of about 20 miles is the 20 mile long Florida Island where the Japanese have established one of their several seaplane reconnaissance bases in the Solomon Islands at Tulagi. The eastern end of the 400 mile long Slot is Savo Sound named for tiny Savo Island. The entrance to Savo Sound from the east is Indispensable Straight leading to several narrow channels. The entrances from the west are the north and south passages around Savo Island.

The United States committed to its first land based counterattack. The Marines landed at both Tulagi and Guadalcanal on 7 Aug 1942. The installation at Guadalcanal was mostly construction workers and was an easy landing. The more established base at Tulagi involved heavy fighting, but was captured in two days. The Japanese responded immediately with air attacks from their bomber bases in New Britain (Rabaul) from the north and fighter strips in the northern Solomons (Bougainville). US carriers operating with the invasion fleet in Savo Sound defended. The IJN also sent the Eighth Fleet from Rabaul to attack the US beachhead. This fleet consisted of five heavy cruisers, two light cruisers and a destroyer.



Aviation fuel that ignited during the battle on board the Australian cruiser Canberra—her survivors being rescued here by the U.S. destroyers Blue (alongside) and Patterson—diverted Japanese attention from the U.S. cruiser Chicago.

The western approaches to Savo Sound were guarded by a screening force of six heavy cruisers and six destroyer (the battle fleet had been destroyed at Pearl Harbor) in two groups covering both passages. Radar pickets were the destroyers Blue (DD-387) and Ralph Talbot (DD-390) deployed west of Savo Island. The south passage was defended by HMAS Australia (flagship of RAdm Crutchley, RN), HMAS Canberra, Chicago (CA-29), Bagley (DD-386) and Patterson (DD-392). The northern group was made up of Vincennes (CA-44), Quincy (CA-39), Astoria (CA-34) and destroyers Helm (DD-391) and Wilson (DD-408). The eastern approaches also had a screening force, made up of light cruisers San Juan (CL-54 flag), HMAS Hobart, and destroyers Monssen (DD-436) and Buchanan (DD-484).

The IJN 8th fleet of fast cruisers arrived the second night and meet the US screening force for the Battle of Savo Island. At the same time, the three US carriers and their escorts, including North Carolina (BB-55), six cruisers, and 16 destroyers, were withdrawing to get out of sight of land-based bombers from Rabaul.

The enemy force of fast cruisers sent out scout floatplanes that reported the American forces. Both radar picket ships (radar range about 10 miles) were at the extreme ends of their patrols sailing away from the Japanese fleet which passed undetected about 500 yards from Blue. The enemy was lost in the visual and radar shadow of nearby Savo Island. Allied ships were faintly silhouetted by a freighter burning far over the horizon. The enemy discovered the southern force and fired torpedoes before they were detected. Simultaneously with the explosions, the scout plane dropped flares illuminating the allied fleet. Canberra was stuck by two torpedoes and heavy shelling. The US ships fired star shells and opened fire. Chicago of the southern force was torpedoed. The Jap force turned north in two columns. The northern defense force had not gotten the word, there was a rain squall in the area, and they assumed the southern force was shooting at aircraft. The two Jap columns passed on each side of the US force and opened fire on Astoria, Quincy, and Vincennes. The American captains ordered "cease fire" assuming they were Americans firing on their own ships. Vincennes caught a torpedo. Robert Talbot came charging south and was attacked first by friendly fire and then raked by the enemy escaping to the north. Quincy and Vincennes went down. During rescue operations for Canberra, Patterson was fired on by Chicago. Canberra was sunk the next morning to prevent capture as the US fleet left the waters that was hereafter called Iron Bottom Sound. Astoria sank about noon while under tow. Chicago had to undergo repair until Jan'43.



The clear victor at Savo Island was Japanese Vice Admiral Gunichi Mikawa, but he failed to follow up on his triumph.

In just 32 minutes the enemy had inflicted massive damage. Four heavy cruisers were sunk and a heavy cruiser and destroyer badly damaged. 1,270 men were killed and 708 injured. The enemy had comparative scratches on three cruisers.

What Went Wrong?

A court of inquiry determined that US ships required more training in night fighting.

There were several sighting of the IJN 8th fleet by USAAF and RAAF aircraft along with several other Japanese ship movements: each report was of different ship compositions and bearings. Weather and enemy air defenses were a factor, yet a common denominator of these sightings was delay in getting the information from MacAuthur's Army zone to Nimitz's Navy zone on the scene. Japanese seaplane carriers were included in the sightings and the Allied fleet prepared for submarine or air attack, rather than surface action. Almost two thousand men paid for a chain of errors.

The 8th fleet cruiser's floatplanes were noticed and reported. Radio communication was poor that night and nobody associated aircraft reconnaissance with a surface attack. Visibility was 2 to 6 miles with rain in the area.

Both radar picket ships (radar range about 10 miles) were at the extreme ends of their patrols sailing away from the Japanese fleet. San Juan had modern search radar, but was at the other end of the Sound. Was too much or too little reliance placed on this new technology? This battle must be considered to have been fought in the pre-radar days.

RAdm Crutchley, RN, was in command of the screening force in recognition of allied unity: three of the eight cruisers were Australian. He had fought with Fletcher at Coral Sea, but was not totally integrated with the US Navy. HMAS Canberra, for instance, did not have TBS (short range radio known as Talk Between Ships) and could not hear the initial alarm issued by USS Patterson. Crutchley had left with his flagship, heavy cruiser Australia, that night to attend a conference called by RAdm Turner and did not participate in the battle. Chicago had the senior captain, but his ship was immediately torpedoed into a state of confusion that even included an exchange of friendly fire.

What went right? Well, nothing, but luck helped a little.

Fortunately the Japanese did not steam through and attack the thinly defended transports. When the lead flagship turned towards the channel, his column, intent on sinking cruisers, failed to follow and continued north, then west to avoid shoal water, but away from the transports. The flagship then turned to chase after his squadron. To reform the Japanese fleet would have taken two hours and after attacking the transports and defenders the fleet would still be in the channel as daylight exposed them to carrier aircraft and any surviving ships of the earlier battle. The flag chartroom had been destroyed so that navigation into the channel would have been dangerous. Japanese naval tradition called for attacking warships; to expose cruisers of a second attack, with no torpedoes left, to extreme risk for half empty transports may not have seemed worthy. They had already won a great victory over warships and that was enough for one night's work. The heavy cruiser, HMAS Australia, with screen commander Crutchley aboard, returning from his midnight meeting with Turner, was steaming to the battle site. Close support for the transports consisted of anti-aircraft light cruiser San Juan and light cruiser HMAS Hobart and destroyers Monssen and Buchanan.

Unaware of the nature of the battle, VAdm Fletcher's 3 carrier and 2 battleship force was withdrawing and not in range to attack the withdrawing enemy cruisers at first light. Fortunately the Japanese did not know this. Equally fortunate was that an enemy air attack of 40 bombers early the next morning could not find the carriers and were only able to finished off Jervis.

Afterword

All agreed the Japanese had not lost their fighting spirit after their defeat at Midway and that the allies had lost a major fight from problems with reconnaissance, communication, and preparedness. Yet RAdm Crutchley calls our attention that the propose of the fleet was to protect the landing and that the enemy did not get through. The cost was 1,270 sailors killed, more than Marine loss in the entire 6 month Guadalcanal campaign, 1,207.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: guadacanal; historylist; navy; savo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: SAMWolf; Sparta
Sparta, you might want to consider pinging the entire list back to this thread for SAMWolf's #39. THAT is an excellent story of the military honoring their heritage and teaching their men about the sacrifices of the predecessors.
41 posted on 12/04/2002 7:19:09 PM PST by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Thanks for the article and follow-up, SAM.

I met a Pearl Harbor Survivor a few months ago who served on a tin can that was sunk, possibly in this battle. I've got to dig through my papers to find the notes I took when we had our conversation. He was a very interesting fellow to talk to and I learned a lot in the short amount of time we spent together. I think I posted a comment at the Canteen about the encounter, but that was during the time that I was on the list. Now, where did I put those notes?

42 posted on 12/04/2002 8:03:47 PM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave
I hope you find the name of the ship. We lost a lost of ships around Guadalcanal, it's be interesting to know if his went down there.
43 posted on 12/04/2002 8:20:14 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: SAMWolf
The clear victor at Savo Island was Japanese Vice Admiral Gunichi Mikawa, but he failed to follow up on his triumph.

Just like Pearl Harbor. If he had followed on and destroyed the transports who know how much longer the war would of lasted.

46 posted on 12/04/2002 9:09:56 PM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tuckessee
Thanks for that clarification, tuckessee. Still haven't found my notes from my conversation with Richard.
47 posted on 12/04/2002 11:33:36 PM PST by Diver Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: copperheadmike
I'm thankful for both your father's and your uncle's service. I'm sorry to hear about your uncle.
49 posted on 12/05/2002 5:36:28 AM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest
The CO got a medal but refused to allow one for my Dad. He hated him for being right.

Thanks for telling about your dad. Being right is seldom forgiven. Fortunately there are still people who will speak up.

50 posted on 12/05/2002 5:47:39 PM PST by pttttt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Valin; SAMWolf
The clear victor at Savo Island was Japanese Vice Admiral Gunichi Mikawa, but he failed to follow up on his triumph.

One fact the the article doesn't make clear is that Mikawa did not know the U.S. carriers had withdrawn. He was certain that if he regrouped and attacked the transports his force would be destroyed by carrier aircraft at sunrise.

In postwar interviews he insisted had made the correct choice in withdrawing, based on the information he had at the time, and was more than a little bitter at the second guessing of his descision by later critics who knew that there was in fact no air threat.

51 posted on 12/11/2002 6:08:10 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
based on the information he had at the time

Correct, second guessing the commander on the spot is easy after the fact.

52 posted on 12/11/2002 6:17:35 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
My brother-in-law was very happy he didn't know.
53 posted on 12/11/2002 9:17:54 PM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Valin
I'll bet!

I just commented because Mikawa has often been portrayed as a moron or a pansy for not going on to the transports. The fact is he beat the snot out of us and as far as he knew, he had excellent tactical reasons to withdraw.
54 posted on 12/11/2002 9:25:18 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest

My Dad was also on The U.S.S Astoria CA-34 “ The Nasty Asty”. He too was wounded during that battle and saved by an unknown sailor. My dads name was Lester E. Iglehart. I’ve become very interested in the battle of Savo Island since he died, he never talked about it with us.


55 posted on 08/03/2016 12:37:13 PM PDT by kigle1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Guadacanal was a nightmare for the Marines, they were operating on a shoestring.

The Guadalcanal invasion was officially called "Operation Watchtower" but the Marines actually did sardonically call it "Operation Shoestring."

This was because these Marines, commanded by Major General Vandegrift, came to the theater expecting to have six months to train and organize their materials before being put into action. Instead, Admiral King demanded an immediate invasion of the Solomons once it became clear that the Japanese were building an airstrip on Guadalcanal island (thanks to the reports of British coast watcher Martin Clemens). This airstrip would have threatened the vital sea routes connecting Australia to the U.S. West Coast.

So the Marines had to deploy immediately with only a portion of the supplies and materials they should have had at their disposal.

Making matters worse, Admiral Fletcher insisted on removing his carriers just two days after the Marines landed as he believed them to be in "grave danger". Admiral Turner insisted that five days were needed to offload the supplies and materials that were brought to the theater but Fletcher would not relent. So the Marines were left to effectively fend for themselves with not even half of the already inadequate supplies they brought.

One can only wonder how the Battle of Savo Island would have turned out had Fletcher kept the three carrier groups in the area.

56 posted on 11/28/2021 5:06:28 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 3 days away from outliving Holly Dunn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson