Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gatex
There was no warrant --- according to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals en banc case in 2001 (June or July.)

-----------------------

As I understand it there was a warrant in existence, but it probably was not present. There was no real interest it it in the mood to have a party.

21 posted on 12/03/2002 1:25:35 PM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: RLK
"As I understand it there was a warrant in existence, but it probably was not present---"

You are correct -- the court case said the surveillance was for a warrant at a later date -- but the U.S. Marshalls did not have a warrant with them, they were to do surveillance only.

The U.S. Marshalls then had the audacity to ask the court for immunity for making a false report, lying to the grand jury and then lying to the court.[all in the court case].

I guess the false report resulted in the FBI actions.

24 posted on 12/03/2002 1:35:06 PM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: RLK
"There was no real interest it it in the mood to have a party."

That pretty much describes the situation at Waco re warrants and the operation name "Show Time." This whole thing disgusts me, because no one has taken responsibility or been brought to justice in either case, and never will be in our lifetimes.

Carolyn

26 posted on 12/03/2002 1:48:26 PM PST by CDHart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson