Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Posted with permission from the site owner.
1 posted on 12/01/2002 1:23:55 PM PST by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: BraveMan
Always nice to read an article by a total "nobody" who has done "nothing", critiquing the founder of FR that has done more in any single weekend than the loser of this article has probably ever done in his whole worthless life.

This author has no credibility to challenge Jim R's accomplishments at all.

"Tell it to the hand"!!!
303 posted on 12/01/2002 4:27:43 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
POPPYCOCK!
310 posted on 12/01/2002 4:30:49 PM PST by blackbart1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Bush II is just a temporary fix. We're working hard here down in the jungle cloning Ronald Reagan and Barry Goldwater.
337 posted on 12/01/2002 4:41:17 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Perhaps once a month or once a year, FR could have a "welcome all idiot ideas day" Post anything you like including racist posts and personal attacks. Everything that day gets deleted after 24 hrs. though. Might be worth a try just to see what happens.
342 posted on 12/01/2002 4:43:00 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Man...

Ever notice most babies are rather ugly and do bad things? Then they GROW UP into handsome young gentlemen and ladies.

FR is exactly that. We should worry when FR starts into old age. Until then, this is a waste of time by naysayers.

350 posted on 12/01/2002 4:47:19 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Here's the rub. Republicans are in control. Why should anyone bitch about that? And who helped that happen?
Freepers did.

Now this writer expects freepers to expose the weaknesses of republicans? I don't think so. Though they should.

We should all be proponents of freedom. And when freedom is sacrificed for so called "security" we should all object. So why is FR flinching?

I don't know.



354 posted on 12/01/2002 4:50:08 PM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
You must be one of those Bob Smith moonies.
361 posted on 12/01/2002 4:52:26 PM PST by Poser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Bad argument for a stupid cause? Or just bad argument? You haven't made that clear.

Many here are eloquently misguided. I like these. Reminds me of Franklin's comment,

He was naturally more eloquent, had a ready plenty of words, and sometimes, as I thought, bore me down more by his fluency than by the strength of his reason."
The very stuff of great sophism! Franklin also said it's easier to convince with flattery than insult. You might next time try painting with prettier language.

Too bad you give us not even that. I've made some damned fine wrong expressions. The least we can have here is something worth listening to. Anything, right or wrong, but make it worth the while.

If you want, I'll give you a pretty phrase on behalf of whatever cause you choose. Give it a try. But you gotta let me know what the hell you're trying to say.

363 posted on 12/01/2002 4:54:05 PM PST by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
The Big Snooze

After the election in 2000 FR other than celebrating went into the big snooze.

It woke up long enough for the 2002 elections and promptly went back to sleep.

Read the welcome on the main page.  FR is not just about electing republicans.

Instead of party or personalities we should be looking at issues.  We sure have enough of them.  We should be every bit as vigilant of any laws, programs and executive orders under republicans as we are under democrats.  We should be every bit as critical under republicans as we are under democrats.

What FR does best it isn't doing now.  All because "or side" won,  all is well.

FR needs to wake up.  The republicans are in charge and in large part what needs to be done is not getting done.  No more excuses.  Government continues to grow, more programs are passed into law, the Constitution continues to be trashed.

Where is the voices that spoke so vehemently before 2000?

Sleep well.  There will be a rude awakening.

WarHawk42

367 posted on 12/01/2002 4:55:34 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
What arrogance. Mr Maggio has forgotten himself, he is/was simply a guest in another man's house. Free Republic belongs to Mr Robinson. It was his hard work and perseverance that gave it life and under his direction FR has survived various internal and external challenges. His house, his rules, follow them or move on and stop sniveling. In a forum, a classroom or a bar if you misbehave, heckle others, repeatedly ignore the house rules you are asked to leave. What is so hard to understand about that ? Civilized people live with rules. For the life of me I do not understand why being courteous and respectful of the owner's wishes can be considered "suckin up" or selling out.

A handful of former FReepers seemed to feel FR was their private domain. Indeed, they voiced undying devotion to the site until they were asked to ahere to the rules then they couldn't leave fast enough or worse yet challenged or argued the rules didn't or shouldn't apply to them. Some, like Mr Maggio, have the audacity to tell Mr Robinson and the rest of us how we must conduct ourselves. My mother used to say when I had my own home I could run it however I saw fit, but as long as I lived under her roof she ruled. Likewise, several years ago after Willie Nelson bought a golf course a reporter asked him what was par. Willie said, "It's anything I say it is, it's my golf course."

If Mr Maggio or any other disgruntled FReepers want a site without rules and are willing to provide the financial, legal and emotional support required for a successful site then do it. But please don't whine when the lawsuits pile up.

370 posted on 12/01/2002 4:57:48 PM PST by Darlin'
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Non-FReeper weather report for the next few years:
Periods of low visibility, coupled with intermittent gales of laughter.
391 posted on 12/01/2002 5:21:54 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Well, this is yet more whiny drivel. I know.......I've been here over four years, I march to NOBODY'S tune, and I know that the so-called "arguments" put forth in this piece are total B.S.

Gotta tell you, I'm more than sick and tired of pissant whiners who decide to attack FR every time something doesn't go their way. Good God in Heaven, if that's the kind of people they are, I don't need them and I don't want them on "my side".

I need street fighters, not crybaby pantywaists.

396 posted on 12/01/2002 5:26:17 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
To all too many Freepers now, anyone calling themselves a Republican is God's brother - and cannot be criticized, no matter how Clintonesque their views on many social issues may be.

The author is either a liar, or hopelessly out of his depth. I have found that one of the most frequently discussed topics on Free Republic is the cancer of RINOs, who by definition are "Republican".

"Dissidents", "JimBob", protesting too much that "Bush is not God", etc.... I don't know what this author is up to, but I don't like the smell.

404 posted on 12/01/2002 5:32:34 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
Matt,

Your website is racist. I'm sure any self-respecting Freeper wouldn't be associated with you or your website. Why are you trying to bring Free Republic down to your level?

You disgust me.
406 posted on 12/01/2002 5:34:13 PM PST by Johnny Shear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
If for no other reason than being show prep for Rush, it has an impact. And FR must be hurting them or they would ignore it.
410 posted on 12/01/2002 5:36:18 PM PST by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
If you splinter your group over single issues then all you will have is infighting and nothing will ever get accomplished. Of course this may be what you want. Since you obviously have no handicaps, why don't you start your own web site and post all your rules on thought behavior and have everyone adhere to them?
424 posted on 12/01/2002 5:49:27 PM PST by my right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
"The Alamance Independent," eh? Fine, I'm game. Let's take a look at this little publication; "By Their Works Shall Ye Know Them" and all that ...

At the very top of the page resides a Confederate battle flag and the tagline "Published in Occupied Confederate Territory." So the site owner just can't get past that Civil War thing, eh? OK, let's move on ...

Ah, here's three prominent links to various weather services, two of them (NWS and NOAA) US government agencies. Various articles within the website excoriate the federal government, paying taxes, et al., while happily pirating the services of that selfsame evuuuull big government. Slightly hypocritical, but that's life in the big city. Let's continue ...

Here's a red link on the left side of the page, flogging a book called "Unintended Consequences" by one John Ross. As most of you will probably remember, John Ross was an unsuccessful Democrat candidate for the Missouri House who was spanked by Jim Talent. Rut-roh, that couldn't be good ...

Oh, here's another ad, for a tome called "Civil War II" by Thomas W. Chittum. Mr. Chittum is an otherwise irrelevant and sad little man who urges his readers to "pee on the imperial American rag flag" rather than salute it. Oh, and even better? Messr. Chittum keeps some interesting company - his spittle-flecked polemic can be found at a web site called "www.churchfliers.com," which is apparently the house organ for a particularly revolting little band known as "The World Church of the Creator" (part of "the JOOZ have tails" crowd). Tsk tsk tsk ...

Lookie lookie, here's another interesting little link. "Gulf War Anti-White Racism Notting Hill London UK" . This one takes you eventually to this web site, a virtual repository for the British equivalent of the racist Deliverance crowd (at least two teeth per mouth, no waiting).

Yuck.

Ain't it amazing what a few minute's web surfing can turn up about "source material"? Now I need to go take a shower and burn my clothes - I'll never get the stench out.

437 posted on 12/01/2002 6:17:24 PM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
What happened to the post earlier today wherein conservatives were disputing the Bush characterization of Islam as a religion of peace? My reply doesn't show, and it's hard for me to believe that this topic would have been censored. Tell me, Joe, it ain't so.
442 posted on 12/01/2002 6:22:20 PM PST by gabby hayes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
This article is certainly not an unbiased presentation when the author makes fun of Jim Robinson.
448 posted on 12/01/2002 6:32:39 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BraveMan
This article is certainly not an unbiased presentation when the author makes fun of Jim Robinson.
449 posted on 12/01/2002 6:32:40 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson