Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PRESIDENT BUSH SURPRISES PRO-LIFE LEADERS BY SELECTING KISSINGER FOR 9-11 POST
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | November 29, 2002 | LifeSiteNews.com

Posted on 11/29/2002 6:39:31 PM PST by Polycarp

PRESIDENT BUSH SURPRISES PRO-LIFE LEADERS BY SELECTING KISSINGER FOR 9-11 POST

Kissinger Strongly Implicated in Population Control and Abortion

WASHINGTON, November 29, 2002 (LifeSiteNews.com) - U.S. President George W. Bush announced Wednesday that he had selected former secretary of state Henry Kissinger as chairman of a new independent commission to investigate the September 11 attacks. Pro-life leaders were surprised by the selection given the President's aversion to coercive abortion and Kissinger's close association with it.

President Bush was praised by the pro-life community internationally for his defunding of the United Nations Population Fund due to their association with the forced abortion and coercive sterilization practices in China. However, Kissinger was intimately associated with coercive population control as he is the author of the now-declassified national security study memorandum calling for population control - coercive if necessary, in the third world.

Gilles Grondin, a veteran United Nations diplomat and past President of Le Mouvement en faveur de la Vie/Campaign Quebec Vie, (the pro-life movement in Quebec), told LifeSite that he was surprised by President Bush's selection of Kissinger. Grondin, who with his vast UN experience has been one of the most successful pro-life lobbyists at the UN, points out that Kissinger's memo NSSM 200 formed the basis of U.S. foreign policy in the area of population.

Grondin explained that the Memorandum suggested that competition from new world powers would rise when developing nations had sufficient populations to utilize their national resources to their full potential. Thus, NSSM 200 was about ensuring U.S. strategic, economic, and military interest, at the expense of developing countries, by proposing population control including by coercive means if mere propaganda could not succeed.

For more on NSSM 200 including the actual document see LifeSite at:

http://www.lifesite.net/waronfamily/nssm200/index.html

See Bush's announcement of his selection of Kissinger: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/11/20021127-1.html


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; enslavedtoideology; monomania; nuttylitmustest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 501 next last
To: sinkspur
New at what? At my age I'll take that as a compliment. I'm railing you for railing about pro-life, not some other poster or Kissinger. Don't lump me in with anybody. If Kissinger is some kind of population queer like Carter is, then he blows too. Just because you don't like a poster's particular style doesn't mean it's fine and dandy to trash pro-lifers as a group. That's just what the lefty media does. It's a sure sign of a low IQ when they do it, you should know better. And get off that "newbie" kick. It just makes you look like a nobody unless you can crawl on top of somebody else. The last thing I am is "new". I manage 3 websites, 10 subdomains, and 5 message boards. How "new" is that?
121 posted on 11/29/2002 9:28:38 PM PST by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I have had that feeling since Nov 5th that we have some folks that came over from DU and RATs.com. I would think they would be more miserable here though! But their shillness is telling!

While some of us are extremely happy!
122 posted on 11/29/2002 9:28:45 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: narses
I see you've already been taken to task for your post (he he).

thanks for the bump. Looks like a lively discussion.

123 posted on 11/29/2002 9:29:52 PM PST by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
Your tin foil is showing.

Don't call me names and don't question my Christianity and don't question my pro-life commitment. You made your initial post. You don't like the responses you got so you resorted to childish behavior.

If you want to be taken seriously, defend your position without making a fool of yourself. Otherwise, shut up.
124 posted on 11/29/2002 9:31:01 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
W doesn't eliminate people from consideration as members of his administration on the basis of their views on abortion.

You're right; Bush is fair to all ideals.

However, Jesus Christ the Lord of lords is NOT politically correct.

Jesus Christ is not fair to all ways, only his true followers who follow his way will be allowed into Heaven.

125 posted on 11/29/2002 9:31:11 PM PST by SwordofTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
"Catholic analysis of Demographic Warfare as it relates to NSSM 200, from the Diocese of Manila"

This seems really relevant to finding out who was responsible for 9/11. </scarcasm>

Think Kissinger will try to pin it on the Bishop of Manila?

Let me give you a clue, as you appear utterly clueless--
"Demographic Warfare" did *NOT* fly into the WTC
126 posted on 11/29/2002 9:31:24 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ALS
You're "new" here. And nobody is trashing pro-lifers as a group.

You haven't read the thread. Read the thread.

127 posted on 11/29/2002 9:31:39 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: ALS
It just makes you look like a nobody unless you can crawl on top of somebody else. The last thing I am is "new". I manage 3 websites, 10 subdomains, and 5 message boards. How "new" is that?

Wow Sinkspur...can you top this resume?
You must really feel like a "nobody" now. LOL

128 posted on 11/29/2002 9:33:02 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
By Polycrap's logic, we should believe that Bill Clinton is a pro-lifer since he appointed an anti-abortion man [Boston Mayor Raymond Flynn?] to be the ambassador to the Vatican.

As much as I am opposed to the gay agenda, I couldn't believe the wasted breath and political capital that was spent by Jesse Helms to attempt to deny James Hormel an ambassadorship to Luxembourg because he's a homosexual.

LUXEMBOURG! Can you believe it? Who cares? Get him on a plane and wave him bye-bye!

In addition, I detest the architects of explicit sex education, and was horrified by the "Fistgate" scandal in Massachusetts, but when Mass. Governor Cellucci -- who ignored evidence about the incident until the word got out in the news -- was chosen as ambassador to Canada, this is what I said when people were assailing Rush for not mentioning it on his show:


I am not a homophobe, and I was incensed about the "Fistgate" incident itself. However, getting hot and bothered about Cellucci becoming ambassador to Canada was a waste of time and energy. There ain't nothing that Cellucci could do to aid in the corruption of America's youth from Ottawa.

So, when was the last time we heard about Hormel? When was the last time we thought about Cellucci?

I am not enthused about Kissinger, but that's for reasons closer to Christopher Hitchens' than Polycarp's!

129 posted on 11/29/2002 9:33:21 PM PST by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth
"only his true followers who follow his way will be allowed into Heaven."

Well this thread is about who will be allowed into the investigating commission, *not* about who will be allowed into Heaven, that's determined at a *much* higher pay grade.
130 posted on 11/29/2002 9:35:44 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: APBaer
Well this thread is about who will be allowed into the investigating commission, *not* about who will be allowed into Heaven, that's determined at a *much* higher pay grade.

Very well stated!

131 posted on 11/29/2002 9:37:10 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Working Paper # 1
I.P.F.A. Foreign Policy Series
 

Population Control
and
National Security

A Review of U.S. National Security Policy
On Population Issues
1970-1988

Population assistance has been a major part of the United States' foreign aid program since 1965. This document, the first in a series of working papers on U.S. foreign policy toward Africa, is based on memoranda from the National Security Council which have been declassified since mid-1989 and on reports by the General Accounting Office and private publishers. Its purpose is to provide background on objectives which form the basis for U.S. population intervention in the developing world.

Information Project For Africa, Inc.
P.O. Box 43345, Washington, DC 20010

 

Table of Contents

 1

The National Security Council

12

Country Programs

2

Demographic Trends

13

Influencing Policy

3

Foreign Aid

14

Public Relations

4

NSSM 200

15

Collaborating with Other Donors

5

Demographic Analysis

16

Intelligence and Research

6

Security Factors of Population Control

17

Family Planning Services

7

Political Factors of Population Control

18

Family Planning Motivation

8

Policy Recommendations

19

Integrated Approach

9

Diplomatic Initiatives

20

Plan of Action

10

Implementation of the Population Strategy

21

Current Policy

11

Report of the Under Secretaries Committee

22

The Pentagon Study
DOWNLOAD THIS DOCUMENT IN MS-WORD FORMAT (155 KB)

 

132 posted on 11/29/2002 9:40:13 PM PST by Polycarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
This isn't a Catholic forum, this isn't a Catholic nation, ALL Conservatives are not Roman Catholic, ALL Christians are not RC, and most of us don't give a damn what Someone from the Diocese of Manila has to say.

You are in no position to decide who is a " real " Christian, Conservative, nor anything else. Your point of view is not THE most important one on FR, and your posts actually do far more harm than good, to your position.

Tell me, do you also have such difficulty , with Henry being the head of the 9/11 investigation, because he's a Jew ?

Your rantings sound very like Torquimada's and Savonarola's. The Inquisition has long been over with, dear. The Pope doesn't tell the rulers of the world what to do, anymore , and you aren't the Pope. :-)

133 posted on 11/29/2002 9:41:31 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Why The Commission



134 posted on 11/29/2002 9:41:50 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You have echoed my sentiments exactly! Thanks!
135 posted on 11/29/2002 9:43:39 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: ALS
Then stay on all of thos siyes and don't think that all of your supposed " qualifictions " , makes you a " somebody " here; it doesn't ! You haven't even been here a year; that makes YOU a newbie .
136 posted on 11/29/2002 9:44:13 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Bingo!
137 posted on 11/29/2002 9:45:43 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
No, sorry:
"Working Paper # 1
I.P.F.A. Foreign Policy Series"

did not tell us who flew the planes into the WTC.

Do you have much more such crap, i.e.,irrelevant to that only point of inquiry, with which you intend further to burden the bandwith?
138 posted on 11/29/2002 9:45:45 PM PST by APBaer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: ALS
The last thing I am is "new". I manage 3 websites, 10 subdomains, and 5 message boards. How "new" is that?

But you can't "manage" to make sense. Oh well.

139 posted on 11/29/2002 9:46:06 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: deport
That link is a really good one! Thanks for posting!
140 posted on 11/29/2002 9:46:39 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 501 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson