Posted for discussion purposes. It is very exciting if true, but if true then why not further information on it? Could this be a big hoax or perhaps there really is a conspiracy by the CIA!!!!
I don't know. But this is a good read. I was first introduced to this years ago by a Von Danikin book. I think that it was his second one. But after 20-30 years or so, if nothing further is found, it must just be a bunch of boloney.
1 posted on
11/28/2002 11:48:10 AM PST by
vannrox
To: vannrox
The men had huge, bulging heads and puny bodies and were so ugly and repellent that they were hounded down by local tribesmen on horseback. We need a couple of these tribesmen to deal with Paul Begala.
To: vannrox
The reason the Nazi's sent teams to Tibet. Someone call Indiana Jones!!
3 posted on
11/28/2002 11:51:29 AM PST by
Destro
To: blam
*ping*
You might like this one. ;o)
To: vannrox
I wonder what a DNA test would reveal...
6 posted on
11/28/2002 12:45:34 PM PST by
okie01
To: vannrox
ping for later reading
To: vannrox
Bump
8 posted on
11/28/2002 1:40:48 PM PST by
Fiddlstix
To: vannrox
"it must just be a bunch of boloney."
Turkey bologna...blame it on the tryptophan.
To: vannrox
Very interesting. Are there any images of these prehistoric CDs? Or the big-headed, puny-bodied skeketons?
To: vannrox
Ah, Tibet.
Mysterious Tibet.
Site of 'Lost Horizon'.
And Shangri-La.
I found James Hilton's fiction much more interesting.
And the movie, starring Ronald Colman, more intriguing.
And, to put a point on it,
A hell of a lot more believable.
13 posted on
11/28/2002 3:11:39 PM PST by
Ole Okie
To: vannrox
I've read stories of caves in the Himalayas with very tall mummies with elongated heads. A few months back I was listening to an archeologist on the radio discribing the same thing in Peru. Who knows what happened long ago or who's been here. I think it's presumptuous of us to believe that we know the history of Earth.
16 posted on
11/28/2002 3:23:47 PM PST by
dljordan
To: vannrox
This article seems to land on the "bunch of baloney" side of your intro in post 1.
To: vannrox
The frail and stunted tribesmen averaged only about five feet in height and were neither typically Chinese nor Tibetan.
Five feet in height is close to the average height of a French male in the 1700s: about 5'2" and 105 pounds.
24 posted on
11/28/2002 9:49:02 PM PST by
aruanan
To: vannrox
Interesting that no previous poster has been able to post viewable images of these remarkable objects.
Me, I'll just keep studying the Voynich Manuscripts.
--Boris
25 posted on
11/28/2002 10:02:05 PM PST by
boris
To: blam
30 posted on
12/22/2008 6:51:59 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, December 6, 2008 !!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson