[metesky]

Destroyed? Not slowed down, but utterly destroyed?

I'm glad I don't travel in your circles, what with the constant inconvenience of stepping over the bodies of the destroyed.

How does one come back from destruction, by the by? Or were you using hyperbole to make a point?

[AppyPappy]

Dead. As a pipe cleaner.

[SheLion]

Destroyed? Not slowed down, but utterly destroyed?

Totally mind-boggling! My goodness. With talk like this, who needs the anti's! They have pulled the wool over more eyes then we thought.

[Kozak]

I am absolutely against prohibition, and the demonology of smokers. It's neoprohibition run wild. That said:

As a physician there is NO DOUBT that smoking is extremely harmful. It ABSOLUTELY results in more heart disease, more lung cancer, more throat cancer, almost all cases of emphysema, peripheral vascular disease, increased incidence of bronchitis, increased incidence of sinusitis. Smoke if you want to, but don't kid yourself into thinking it's harmless. You may be lucky and live to a vigorours 90, but you sure aren't playing the odds if you smoke.

[oldironsides]

Smoking is not good for you. I would rather have a smoker
working for me than a Prozac or Zoloft chemical affected person. When a smoker grabs a cigarette I know that he or she is still functioning the same after the cigarette. I do not know any such thing about someone ingesting chemicals to cope. Nobody can explain to me how tobacco is any worse than these pills used long term. Someone needs a cigarette to relax? So what. I do not smoke and I see a link to slamming smoking while drug companies push all sorts of drugs to cope. Smoking bad, chemical coping acceptable..............

[OKIEDOC]

LOL