Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metesky
Smoking is not good for you. I would rather have a smoker
working for me than a Prozac or Zoloft chemical affected person. When a smoker grabs a cigarette I know that he or she is still functioning the same after the cigarette. I do not know any such thing about someone ingesting chemicals to cope. Nobody can explain to me how tobacco is any worse than these pills used long term. Someone needs a cigarette to relax? So what. I do not smoke and I see a link to slamming smoking while drug companies push all sorts of drugs to cope. Smoking bad, chemical coping acceptable..............
75 posted on 11/26/2002 6:57:27 AM PST by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: oldironsides
When a smoker grabs a cigarette I know that he or she is still functioning the same after the cigarette.

Actually he will function BETTER. His concentration, memory functions will improve while the stress level will go down. In some aspects the effect on productivity will be even greater than with coffee.

87 posted on 11/26/2002 7:09:34 AM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: oldironsides
Smoking is not good for you. I would rather have a smoker working for me than a Prozac or Zoloft chemical affected person.

I have been dissed about this when I say: smoking is my relaxation of choice. What do you prefer.....prescription drugs or booze.

Your right! Smoking tobacco does not put a person in la-la land.

99 posted on 11/26/2002 7:27:23 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: oldironsides
I do not smoke and I see a link to slamming smoking while drug companies push all sorts of drugs to cope. Smoking bad, chemical coping acceptable..............

That's how this war on the smokers got started. Big Pharm invented their wonderful (?) kick smoking aides, so then they wanted everyone to quit smoking so smokers could be dependent on THEM!

Click on photo.

102 posted on 11/26/2002 7:33:24 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: oldironsides
#1.) Nobody said smoking was without risk and hasn't been detremental to health of many. (I don't think. I didn't.)

#2.) I agree with you 100%.

165 posted on 11/26/2002 9:04:58 AM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: oldironsides

Very good point, one I have said over and over.


392 posted on 03/23/2006 6:52:45 PM PST by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson