Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rs79bm
I guess now we know that your pictures simply don't go into a machine, into the packaging, and back to you ... rather someone looks at every which one of them. I personally think this is invasion of privacy.
4 posted on 11/25/2002 3:33:00 PM PST by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rs79bm
Legally, probably not, but in any case, the market has provided the solution. Buy a digital camera and print at home on your own HP photo printer. Save money, too.
9 posted on 11/25/2002 3:38:17 PM PST by Magnum44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: rs79bm
I guess now we know that your pictures simply don't go into a machine, into the packaging, and back to you ... rather someone looks at every which one of them. I personally think this is invasion of privacy.

I used to work at a Wal-Mart photo lab and the employees were required to inspect each photo to make sure there was no copyright violations and no nudity (store policy). I usually didn't bother enforcing the no-nudity policy. Often times I would place the most embarassing photo right on top of the stack just to see the look on thier faces as most people liked to open up thier pictures right after paying for them. The most memorable moment was the time a father was picking up his college student daughter's pictures. I'll leave the rest to your imagination.

98 posted on 11/26/2002 1:39:18 AM PST by rmmcdaniell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson