Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feinstein to Demos: Time to get tough
SF Gate via Drudge Report ^ | Sunday, November 24, 2002 | Editorial Staff - Phillip Matier, Andrew Ross

Posted on 11/25/2002 6:38:12 AM PST by vannrox

Feinstein to Demos: Time to get tough

Phillip Matier, Andrew Ross Sunday, November 24, 2002

In the wake of the Democrats' Nov. 5 election defeats, Dianne Feinstein has some advice for her fellow party members: Take off the gloves.

"We haven't done near enough of a job tagging the Republicans," the senior senator from California said this past week while back home in San Francisco.

As a result, President Bush "was very much able to obfuscate on the whole issue of the economy with his pre-election push for national security issues," Feinstein said.

Now, she said, the time has come for the Democrats to step back up to the plate.

"We need to be the party that stands for a free, fair and open marketplace. We should be the ones who say if he doesn't appoint strong and full advocates for the commissions that oversee the marketplace, then we should filibuster and kill any appointments until he does."

Feinstein said even the issue of putting the brakes on Bush's tax cuts for the rich -- something a lot of Democrats don't want to touch -- should be put back in play.

"I mean, I've never had a person who makes over $200,000 tell me they need a tax cut," Feinstein said.

That's not the only place where Democrats need to step it up, she added.

"Remember Whitewater? They spent, what, $60 million on an investigation of the president and nothing ever came of it.

"Meanwhile, now there has been virtually no criticism of (Vice President Dick) Cheney with respect to that energy bill that he put together," with the supposed help of the very energy companies that would benefit, Feinstein said.

"We have to follow up on that," she said.

She also thinks the Democrats should continue to stand firm on the idea that the United States should not go it alone in Iraq.

"The reason the president got 77 votes (in the Senate) on his Iraq resolution -- and that includes mine -- is that he agreed to a diplomatic initiative with the United Nations, which was essentially what we Democrats had been saying all along," Feinstein said.

"None of us, I don't think, is all that supportive of doing in Saddam Hussein -- that is, assassinating Saddam -- nor are we supporting a unilateral action by America alone."

Speaking of going it alone, since Feinstein sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, we thought we'd ask her about the rumors that the United States already has special operations forces in Iraq.

Her response: "I can't answer that."

And that talk of assassinating Hussein?

"That was the initial thrust of the administration," Feinstein said. "But I haven't heard it mentioned lately."

On another front, there's been a lot of talk since the election of who should be the voice of the Democratic Party.

And on that point, Feinstein openly admits that "right now we don't have that individual."

She clearly doesn't think it's the party's current chairman, Terry McAuliffe -- in fact, she thinks the job should be split between two people, although she didn't say who.

As for who she might like to see get the Democratic nomination in 2004?

"Well, John Kerry of Massachusetts might be one, but I don't want to be evaluating candidates in your column," Feinstein said.

How about Al Gore?

"Too early to tell. I can't quite figure out yet who he is."

Joe Lieberman?

"I mean, I know who Joe is -- but I don't know. . . . Look, I don't want to say all of this on the record. We'll talk about it some other time. You're just trying to get me to say something so you can make news for your column."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2002; 2004; california; change; clinton; communist; congress; control; democrat; dnc; dream; election; feinstein; future; gore; lasting; liberal; plan; wish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Crazy and stupid woman. How and why she is in Congress I'll never know. But I can place blame on the current educational system, and FDR for making it that way. - Feinstein is a direct result of social policies at the expense of the the primary sources of communication ...Reading...Math and History.
1 posted on 11/25/2002 6:38:12 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The weird thing about it is she is not as crazy & stupid a Barbarous Boxer.

She's in the Senate because Pete Wilson, when he became Governor, appointed John Seymour to be the interim Senator to fill the remainder of Wilson's Senate Term. Wilson's "Republican" administration IMHO helped the Democratic party in California more than anything.

2 posted on 11/25/2002 6:42:54 AM PST by Credo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"It's time to get tough," said the old buzzard to the vultures.
3 posted on 11/25/2002 6:45:32 AM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"We need to be the party that stands for a free, fair and open marketplace.

Dim dem to Di; "Er, ah, Ms Feinstein, we just LOST to that party!"

4 posted on 11/25/2002 6:48:49 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"I mean, I've never had a person who makes over $200,000 tell me they need a tax cut," Feinstein said.

That's because they work !! They don't have time to beat a dead dog with a worthless commie bitch like you Ms. Fienstein.

If I did meet you face to face however, I would rather spit on you than try to converse with you.


5 posted on 11/25/2002 6:55:09 AM PST by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
As a result, President Bush "was very much able to obfuscate on the whole issue of the economy with his pre-election push for national security issues," Feinstein said.

What really kills them is that they know from their polling in this election that they have NO advantage over the Republicans on the economy. The public is spilt dead even on which party can better deal with economic problems... throw in the GOP advantage on foreign policy issues, and the Dems don't have a leg to stand on.

6 posted on 11/25/2002 7:01:02 AM PST by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
BTW, the President makes $400,000 per year -- didn't he say he needs a tax cut?
7 posted on 11/25/2002 7:01:48 AM PST by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"I mean, I've never had a person who makes over $200,000 tell me they need a tax cut," Feinstein said.

Then let me be the first.

8 posted on 11/25/2002 7:02:15 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"The reason the president got 77 votes (in the Senate) on his Iraq resolution...

The reason is because it was political suicide not to.

She better not try to get on the ticket in 2004. Hillary has that in her cross-hairs.

9 posted on 11/25/2002 7:10:07 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
We can have soak-the-rich EuroSocialism, or we can have American style Capitalism.

I guess the Senator from San Francisco chooses EuroSocialism.
10 posted on 11/25/2002 7:12:20 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"I mean, I've never had a person who makes over $200,000 tell me they need a tax cut," Feinstein said.

And how many people who earn less than $200,000 have been telling you that they need a tax cut...and have you been listening to them?

11 posted on 11/25/2002 7:15:01 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
"I mean, I've never had a person who makes over $200,000 tell me they need a tax cut," Feinstein said.

I think this election said in some way that people who DON'T make $200,000 a year are saying that their employers, and the companies represented in their 401-Ks, need a tax cut.

The dems are reacting in a way which will take them straight to oblivion in future elections. The sheeple, THEY ARE AWAKE NOW!

12 posted on 11/25/2002 7:18:58 AM PST by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"I mean, I've never had a person who makes over $200,000 tell me they need a tax cut," Feinstein said.

She and her husband together make lots more than $200,000. Did she vote to give herself and others in Congress a raise while voting to not give the taxpayers a small tax cut?
13 posted on 11/25/2002 7:28:02 AM PST by Travelgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
How about Al Gore?

"Too early to tell. I can't quite figure out yet who he is."


LOL. Neither can he.
14 posted on 11/25/2002 7:30:41 AM PST by self_evident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Message: Now that enough time has passed, and that most people have forgotten that this started on Clinton's watch, let's make it look like Bush is reponsible.

Only problem is, more and more people can remember vividly what Bill Clinton left this country. And it wasn't much more than a stain on a blue dress and a national security apparatus that was asleep at the switch.

Unless one considers the "diversity" quilt at CIA a security blanket.

15 posted on 11/25/2002 7:31:36 AM PST by CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
In the wake of the Democrats' Nov. 5 election defeats, Dianne Feinstein has some advice for her fellow party members: Take off the gloves.

THe democrats have never been more shrill than they were prior to the last election. I fervently pray they heed ol' turkeyneck's advise.

16 posted on 11/25/2002 7:34:50 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
I suggest that every freeper contact Ms. Feinsteins's
office and tell her that they make over $200,000 and
they DO want a tax cut.

Contact data:

Phone: (202) 224-3841
Fax: (202) 228-3954

to send a postal mail:

Senator Dianne Feinstein
United States Senate
331 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

or email:
http://feinstein.senate.gov/email.html
17 posted on 11/25/2002 8:34:05 AM PST by PhilipNolan95126
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: self_evident
How about Al Gore?

"Too early to tell. I can't quite figure out yet who he is."

Definitely a nugget worth saving. And bringing up when Algore wins the 'Rats' 2004 nomination...

18 posted on 11/25/2002 8:45:23 AM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Let the stupid democrats continue to whine and moan that the reason they fared so poorly in the recent elections is THEY DIDN'T GET THEIR MESSAGE OUT.

The simple truth is, they DID get their message out - but the voters weren't buying it this time.

The first step in solving a problem is admitting to oneself what the problem is. So far the dems. appointed spokespersons - OwlGore, Dashole, Feinstein et. al. - haven't been able to do that.

Let's hope and pray that continues to be the case.

19 posted on 11/25/2002 8:54:44 AM PST by KeyBored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
We haven't done near enough of a job tagging the Republicans

Yawn...

20 posted on 11/25/2002 8:55:39 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson