Posted on 11/22/2002 6:01:00 AM PST by riley1992
Nu? So who pays retail?
/Jackie Mason voice.
Y'know, I bet the toys were all made in China, too.
True, although whether you visited Europe or Asia, the same people who love to sneer at our moral nannies don't mind having their own lives ruled by economic nannies. They have no more privacy in their financial affairs than this unfortunate women had with her dildo collection.
ROTFL !
He (or she) will come into the court with perfectly blow dried hair, get on his knees in front of the jury. "We are a nation of laws", he will pronounce with a tear running down his face, "This law may not be popular, but if we ignored the laws of our great nation, there would be anarchy. Liberty and freedom would be in jeopardy. Therefore, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you must render this criminal as guilty as charged!"
Actually, it sounds more like one of those old laws that had been forgotten for years until some cop who badly needed to fill his quota that month could use it to add a charge to the original traffic offense.
Here in Arizona, a batch of forgotten anti-sex laws were recently discovered by someone rummaging through the basement of the Legislature. They were repealed right away. Our Christian Taliban - all eleven or so of them - vowed to make this an election issue in 2002, but their campaign sank without a trace. Good riddance.
Well here in the South, many of our states still have these 'old' laws as you say, and many citizens of all the states are glad for them. However with the influx of immigration (from Mexico and the north), these laws will unfortunately be challenged sooner or later
Here in Arizona, a batch of forgotten anti-sex laws were recently discovered by someone rummaging through the basement of the Legislature. They were repealed right away
Well good. If the majority of the citizens within the state of Arizona feel that way, then that is their right. However for states that have a majority of citizens that don't want those laws to disappear, those states should not be ridiculed as evidenced on this thread
Laws passed must conform to an ideological standard from which they derive their legitimacy. On the federal level, it's our Constitution. It's a contract, of sorts, that says government can only go so far before it begins intruding on the natural law rights of the citizens who must live by these laws. Otherwise, a legislature could pass whatever crap it wanted to pass so long as it could muster up 51% of the legislators to support it.
He or she has already necessarily answered that in the affirmative. To cut an exception would negate his/her whole argument.
I thought so too, but I was trying to get billbears to cut through the cloud of pink smoke that he was blowing to confuse the issue.
In this case, it would be "Your peckers, please!"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.