Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police find 17 sex toys in local woman's car during DUI traffic stop
Longview News-Journal ^ | November 21, 2001 | John Lynch

Posted on 11/22/2002 6:01:00 AM PST by riley1992

11-21, local: Police find 17 sex toys in local woman's car during DUI traffic stop

By JOHN LYNCH

WHITE OAK — A Longview woman who sells sex toys has been charged with felony obscenity after White Oak police found some of her wares in her car during a traffic stop

The arrest report describes the 17 items as "obscene materials and obscene devices," but Police Chief Charlie Smith said the items were mostly lotions and objects defined in a dictionary as having the shape and often the appearance of the male genitalia, used in sexual stimulation.

How illegal is that? Prosecutors will have to decide when White Oak investigators forward their findings to the district attorney's office sometime in the next week, Smith said.

"We'll see what they do with it," Smith said.

Kathleen Elizabeth "Kathy" Grubbs, a distributor for the national company Slumber Parties Inc., calls the charge, which carries a maximum penalty of two years in jail, "kind of ridiculous."

State law appears a little less forgiving: It's illegal to "wholesale promote" obscene materials or devices. Texas statute says an obscene device is a simulated sexual organ or an item designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs. The law allows investigators to assume that anyone with six or more of the items is intending to promote them.

In April, Kilgore police raided the Adult Book Store/Video Store at 1907 Industrial Blvd., seizing 12 large trash bags full of devices police said were being sold illegally. The raid came after an undercover officer visited the shop twice before the raid, making at least one purchase. An 11-page inventory compiled by police estimated the materials were worth $19,082. The sexual devices on the 11-page inventory ranged in price from a "Climax Band" that sold for $5.95 to a "Wild and Crazy Tickler" for $11.95; a "Hyper Sonic G" for $69.95; a "Plush Playmate" for $89.95; and a "Cyber Sexploration Kit" for $44.95.

The store owner, Robert Duggan III, was never arrested, but he agreed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor count of obscene display, a charge equivalent to a traffic ticket, and agreed to pay a fine and let police destroy the items.

Grubbs, 47, said she has been selling the items for about two months as a distributor for Slumber Parties Inc., a national sex toy party business that operates out of Ohio and Louisiana.

Slumber Parties is where the Tupperware party meets Victoria's Secret, the company says on its Web site. The distributors host women-only parties in private homes to show off their merchandise. Grubbs stresses the parties are only for adults, meaning no one allowed under age 18, and men are definitely prohibited.

"Believe it or not, there's a lot of women who go to these parties," Grubbs said. "It's very popular."

Company officials did not return a call Wednesday, but Slumber Parties claims its network of distributors sold $15 million in "romance-enriching" products, including lotions, powders, lingerie and private bedroom accessories, with prices ranging from $2.50 to $139. Sales this year are expected to reach $20 million.

The seizure of the items occured during a traffic stop on Texas 42 on Old Highway 80 in White Oak at 10:27 p.m. Monday. Police stopped Grubbs' truck after seeing her driving erratically, an arrest report said. She failed or refused to perform field sobriety tests and was charged with driving while intoxicated, and a breath test showed she had blood-alcohol levels of 0.228 percent and 0.22 percent, the report said.

Police searching her truck after the arrest found the box of erotic items. The White Oak police chief said investigators are used to finding drugs and guns, but sex toys are the first in his 22 years of experience.

"There's no telling what you'll find on one of these stops," Smith said.

 

Cars
Movies
Stocks
Click here to find out more!
Jobs

   



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last
To: jlogajan
It's illegal to "wholesale promote" obscene materials or devices.

Nu? So who pays retail?

/Jackie Mason voice.

41 posted on 11/22/2002 6:56:29 AM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
Don't they have some illegal immigrants somewhere to chase down and deport?

Y'know, I bet the toys were all made in China, too.

42 posted on 11/22/2002 6:57:47 AM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: robjna
while out of the country lately, the foreigners i talked to are astonished at americas belief that they are the moral judges of the world and that they are intrusive of not only their own citizens lifes , but of other countrys citizens. Who give a rats ass if this woman had a trunk full of dildos and whos business is it anyways if she does. I had to agree with the foreigners.

True, although whether you visited Europe or Asia, the same people who love to sneer at our moral nannies don't mind having their own lives ruled by economic nannies. They have no more privacy in their financial affairs than this unfortunate women had with her dildo collection.

43 posted on 11/22/2002 7:03:33 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
She must be a big Steely Dan fan.
44 posted on 11/22/2002 7:04:00 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: putupon
A drunk woman w/ 17 sex toys? Hot Dog!

ROTFL !

45 posted on 11/22/2002 7:06:39 AM PST by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
This is the kind of crap that gives law enforcement a bad name. It will be interesting to see how the DA will handle this case.

He (or she) will come into the court with perfectly blow dried hair, get on his knees in front of the jury. "We are a nation of laws", he will pronounce with a tear running down his face, "This law may not be popular, but if we ignored the laws of our great nation, there would be anarchy. Liberty and freedom would be in jeopardy. Therefore, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you must render this criminal as guilty as charged!"

46 posted on 11/22/2002 7:08:26 AM PST by Technoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
If the citizens elected their state representatives that passed this law, then it should be enforced. No questions.

Actually, it sounds more like one of those old laws that had been forgotten for years until some cop who badly needed to fill his quota that month could use it to add a charge to the original traffic offense.

Here in Arizona, a batch of forgotten anti-sex laws were recently discovered by someone rummaging through the basement of the Legislature. They were repealed right away. Our Christian Taliban - all eleven or so of them - vowed to make this an election issue in 2002, but their campaign sank without a trace. Good riddance.

47 posted on 11/22/2002 7:10:46 AM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
The company thats contracts it's IT services out to my company, just tightened up their smoking policy. No smoking at all on company property. That reminded me of an essay by the great Murray Rothbard in which he describes smokers as Americas most persecuted minority. He then lays out what he believes to be the historical basis for allmost all American anti-sin, "uplift" program: a particular view of the end times involving an scriptural interpretation that their would be a 1000 year reign of the Kingdom of God on earth before Christ's return. Those who believed this doctrine then proceeded to try to stamp out sin through various means, including of course, the state through legislation. The Texas laws have their roots in this neo-Puritanism. The Rothbard essay is archived at www.lewrockwell.com.
48 posted on 11/22/2002 7:11:13 AM PST by ToryNotion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: riley1992
Amazing. Perhaps they should limit people to one purchase per month, and require a collector's license for more than 6.

Antiques and non-functional ones don't count, of course.
50 posted on 11/22/2002 7:18:06 AM PST by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
Actually, it sounds more like one of those old laws that had been forgotten for years until some cop who badly needed to fill his quota that month could use it to add a charge to the original traffic offense.

Well here in the South, many of our states still have these 'old' laws as you say, and many citizens of all the states are glad for them. However with the influx of immigration (from Mexico and the north), these laws will unfortunately be challenged sooner or later

Here in Arizona, a batch of forgotten anti-sex laws were recently discovered by someone rummaging through the basement of the Legislature. They were repealed right away

Well good. If the majority of the citizens within the state of Arizona feel that way, then that is their right. However for states that have a majority of citizens that don't want those laws to disappear, those states should not be ridiculed as evidenced on this thread

51 posted on 11/22/2002 7:19:17 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I see several things from your somewhat disjointed response
  1. You did not respond to any of my questions, so you have no response to them and are trying to hide the fact with a bunch of meaningless verbage
  2. That you believe in moral relativism. "If the state passes a law that fits with the morality of the majority of its citizens " This is just saying that there is no such thing as good and evil, just popular trends.
  3. That you believe that there is no limit to the role of government. You say "The standard could be set at the national level" Where in the constitution does it say the role of government is to set standards for what constituties "morality?" Obviously you believe that government should enforce anything as long as it can get away with it.
  4. Your beliefs are to the left of Alan Dershowtiz. Even this liberal Clintonista believes that the 1st Amendment protects pornography
  5. What on earth does the 14th amendment have to do with this? Are you talking about "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Finally I ask my questions again, If the legislature passed a law requiring that all citizens turn in their firearms, do you think it should be obeyed without question? If the legislature passed a law requiring Jews to wear yellow stars whould it be obeyed without question?
52 posted on 11/22/2002 7:20:36 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: billbears
State laws of any state which citizens of other states don't like should be repealed. H#ll, with that argument why bother having state legislatures at all? The standard could be set at the national level. And if the majority of the citizens in a small town don't like certain aspects, that's just too bad isn't it?

Laws passed must conform to an ideological standard from which they derive their legitimacy. On the federal level, it's our Constitution. It's a contract, of sorts, that says government can only go so far before it begins intruding on the natural law rights of the citizens who must live by these laws. Otherwise, a legislature could pass whatever crap it wanted to pass so long as it could muster up 51% of the legislators to support it.


53 posted on 11/22/2002 7:24:27 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
If the legislature passed a law requiring Jews to wear yellow stars whould it be obeyed without question?

He or she has already necessarily answered that in the affirmative. To cut an exception would negate his/her whole argument.

54 posted on 11/22/2002 7:30:50 AM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Maybe the woman was a dildographer.
55 posted on 11/22/2002 7:35:11 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hap; Bacon Man
Party at this chick's house!
56 posted on 11/22/2002 7:35:18 AM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
He or she has already necessarily answered that in the affirmative. To cut an exception would negate his/her whole argument.

I thought so too, but I was trying to get billbears to cut through the cloud of pink smoke that he was blowing to confuse the issue.

57 posted on 11/22/2002 7:36:17 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Were the Dildos loaded ?
58 posted on 11/22/2002 7:38:31 AM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
Driving Using Insertable
59 posted on 11/22/2002 7:46:51 AM PST by AngryJawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldCorps
"your papers, please"

In this case, it would be "Your peckers, please!"

60 posted on 11/22/2002 7:50:27 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson