Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SarahW
I agree with you -- he's just covering the kids faces so they aren't photographed, and he's not putting them in mortal danger or "losing" it -- the one kid is holding on to him he probably shouldn't have dangled the baby over the outside of the railing, but he's got a good grip on him (her ??) The first pic looks a little "scary' because Jackson's yelling, but the others show he was just interacting with people down below.

He is still a weirdo tho'

84 posted on 11/19/2002 9:58:59 AM PST by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: twyn1
he probably shouldn't have dangled the baby over the outside of the railing, but he's got a good grip on him...

Couldn't fathom dangling my son off of a balcony regardless of how good a grip I had on him. Jackson should not have access to children (or plastic surgeons).

97 posted on 11/19/2002 10:15:42 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: twyn1
You need to watch the video. The baby almost slipped! He DID NOT have a good grip! Why would any sane person dangle a baby over a railing, a few stories up? He practically shoved it over the rail! The leg was stuck, and he pushed the baby, and his arm went around the baby's neck! That is putting that baby in mortal danger. The baby would die if it fell one story to the ground!
110 posted on 11/19/2002 10:31:53 AM PST by tuckrdout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: twyn1
He had trouble getting the baby over the rail. It's feet were stuck on the other side of the rail and he had to pull the baby harder over the railing. He did not have a good handle on this child.

I can't believe you said he "probably" shouldn't have dangled this child. He DEFINITELY should't have dangled this child. He also does drugs as we have seen in other interviews. I have no idea if they are prescibed drugs or not, but he has appeared in public where he is incoherent. He is also a child molestor from way back, which the Hollywood crowd continues to ignore. He paid the child's family off. I remember the article in Parade magazine a number of years before the child molesting charge that talked about how Michael had all these children over and had them sleep in his bedroom with him. He is one sick individual.

He paid a woman to have babies for him then paid her off to leave the children completely in his custody. No one even knows where he got the new baby.

It time for the authorities to quit looking the other way and investigate this man.
162 posted on 11/19/2002 1:32:17 PM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson