[FR_addict]

He had trouble getting the baby over the rail. It's feet were stuck on the other side of the rail and he had to pull the baby harder over the railing. He did not have a good handle on this child.

I can't believe you said he "probably" shouldn't have dangled this child. He DEFINITELY should't have dangled this child. He also does drugs as we have seen in other interviews. I have no idea if they are prescibed drugs or not, but he has appeared in public where he is incoherent. He is also a child molestor from way back, which the Hollywood crowd continues to ignore. He paid the child's family off. I remember the article in Parade magazine a number of years before the child molesting charge that talked about how Michael had all these children over and had them sleep in his bedroom with him. He is one sick individual.

He paid a woman to have babies for him then paid her off to leave the children completely in his custody. No one even knows where he got the new baby.

It time for the authorities to quit looking the other way and investigate this man.

[twyn1]

I said "probably" before I saw the video -- and before I heard he was on the fifth floor -- from the only picture posted on here (at the time) it didn't look like he was anywhere near that high up or that the baby was in danger -- I've playfully tossed my own kids up in the air and done "helicopter" rides (where you spin around holding on to one arm and leg) which other people might see as dangerous if they took a picture out of context -- I have since seen the video and heard more about it and changed my opinion -- it was a dangerous thing to do

[tuckrdout]

Bravo! You said it! Did you read his testimony from his recent trial? Bizarrro! He does not live in reality at all! He is nuts, and his kids need help....