To: Elsie
So you say -- incorrectly. In any event, the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing.......
73 posted on
11/18/2002 2:11:21 PM PST by
tracer
To: tracer; Elsie
In any event, the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing....... Yeah, it proves nothing in the BoM to be true.
74 posted on
11/18/2002 2:12:39 PM PST by
Wrigley
To: tracer
the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing.......You can't POSSIBLY believe this!!!
77 posted on
11/18/2002 2:30:33 PM PST by
Elsie
To: tracer; drstevej; Wrigley; Elsie
So you say -- incorrectly. In any event, the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing.......LOL Yea they were here but we can not prove it
Tracer if it was not VERY important your church would not do tall the "research" they do ..it is IMPORTANT because without ANY proof it is just another fairy tale
80 posted on
11/18/2002 5:23:28 PM PST by
RnMomof7
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson