Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie
So you say -- incorrectly. In any event, the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing.......
73 posted on 11/18/2002 2:11:21 PM PST by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: tracer; Elsie
In any event, the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing.......

Yeah, it proves nothing in the BoM to be true.

74 posted on 11/18/2002 2:12:39 PM PST by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: tracer
the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing.......

You can't POSSIBLY believe this!!!

77 posted on 11/18/2002 2:30:33 PM PST by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: tracer; drstevej; Wrigley; Elsie
So you say -- incorrectly. In any event, the presence or absence of "archeological evidence" proves nothing.......

LOL Yea they were here but we can not prove it

Tracer if it was not VERY important your church would not do tall the "research" they do ..it is IMPORTANT because without ANY proof it is just another fairy tale

80 posted on 11/18/2002 5:23:28 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson