Official DNC Webpage:GOP Leadership Puts Anti-Choice Measures at the Top of Agenda

Headline of The DNC Official Web Page ^ | 11/12/02 | DNC

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

B U M P

[goodnesswins]

AGAIN....P R O J E C T I O N.....this is what the Dims are hoping (planning) will be one of the top "issues" on the Republican's agenda.....it's typical....this is the ONE topic the Dims want to KEEP at the TOP of the Media's LIST....as if this were the only issue the Republican's had. THEY ARE SO TRANSPARENT!

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

--Two simple reasons why the Republicans won.--

1) The DNC and the Clinton King and Queen were effectively told by the American people....

WERE NOT GONNA TAKE,NO! WERE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE

NO MORE LIES, HATRED, CORRUPTION AND EMBARRASMENT!!!

LOOK AT THE DIFFERENCE IN THE TWO PARTIES AND IT IS A NO-BRAINER AS TO WHY THE DNC LOST!

2)

THE RNC WEB PAGE

THE DNC WEB PAGE

THE DIFFERENCE IS APPARENT...THE RNC HAS CLASS AND MORALS AND AN AGENDA THE MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT. THE DNC ARE A BUNCH OF CHILDISH, WHINY LOSERS, THAT DO NOTHING BUT BASH OTHERS ON THEIR WEB PAGE!

AMERICA WISED UP AND BOUGHT A HUMONGOUS CONTAINER OF DRAINO AFTER CUTTING THROUGH THE DEMS PLUMB SNOW JOB WITH CHAIN SAWS. THE $HIT HAS BEEN ALL CLEARED!

[Wil H]

The "Woman's Right to Choose" (choose what) does not exist!

Yes it does, she can choose to keep the child or give it up for adoption.

The problem is that THE BABY'S right to chose does not exist. The Murdering Left would flush the little inconvenience away before it has a chance to claim it's rights.

[Marauder]

ROTFLMAO - How true.

[stylin_geek]

Actually, I think Ann Coulter has it wrong. (I'm a fan of Ms. Coulter, before anyone starts in on me) The Democratic Party should not be renamed "The Abortion Party", it should be known as the "Take no Responsiblity for your Actions Party." I know it is not as neat as "Abortion Party" but I think it describes the current form and agenda of the Democrats very well.

[Wil H]

By going to The DNC Web Page You will receive pop up air messages begging you to defeat the RABID Republicans.......

by DONATING money, of course!

So send them a cheque for 2 cents and demand a reciept by mail. It's a net financial loss to them. If enough of us do it, we could bankrupt them

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Democrat Attacks:Set the Record Straight:Tell Us About False, Misleading Attacks

[goodnesswins]

Yep....sending them a 2 cent check will also guarantee they send you more solicitations by mail, which then you can send back empty, which will cost them even more.....hmmm..I might consider this, even though I hate the thought of getting all their junk mail. Actually, though, should probably send 50 cents, then it looks somewhat legitimate.

[Mo1]

it should be known as the "Take no Responsiblity for your Actions Party."

EXCELLENT!!! ...

There was a time in this country when character counted and taking responsibility was the right and honorable thing to do.

There was a time in this country when RESPECT for one's self and others meant something

This is something that the Dems have no clue about and Clinton is a prime example of that

And yes I like Ann myself, however in this case I agree .. she is wrong

[Marauder]

... dumbocrats really do think that GW intends to push a law through requiring women to make up their minds more quickly.

NOW have been debating whether to oppose this very concept, but still haven't decided :)

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Policy, Not Popularity, Won Elections for GOP Capitol Hill

Survey Says Popularity of Bush's Positions Won Elections

By Jeff Johnson
CNSNews.com Congressional Bureau Chief
November 11, 2002

Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - Democrat pundits quickly assigned blame for their party's losses in the November elections to President Bush's popularity as a "wartime president." However, a survey released Monday claims it was candidates' conservative positions on national domestic issues that won voters, not Bush's popularity.

The day after the elections, which returned the Senate to Republicans and solidified their control of the House, Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe said Republicans' edge over his party was a "tactical rather than ideological" one.

"Ultimately, many of our candidates couldn't overcome the political muscle that carried many Republicans over the finish line. They had a wartime president with the highest sustained approval ratings in history, who made these elections his number one domestic priority," McAuliffe claimed.

"[These] results certainly don't reflect an ideological tip in favor of the Republicans," he added.

Not so, according to a new survey released Monday by the United Seniors Association (USA). The poll queried 1,000 registered voters who cast ballots in the Nov. 5 elections.

"It appears, mysteriously, that liberals look at the electorate as if every area of the country was like Rep. Barney Frank's (D-Mass.) district or Rep. Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) district," Charles Jarvis, USA chairman and CEO, said referring to the two lawmakers from well-recognized liberal congressional districts. "That is a massive error in judgment."

The survey, conducted Nov. 6 and 7 by The Winston Group, seems to support Jarvis' contention that Democrats' liberal agenda hurt them at the polls. Results of the survey indicate that:

• "Making the Bush tax cut permanent" was supported by 53 percent of those surveyed, compared to 34 percent who wanted to repeal it;
  
• "Agreeing with a candidate's positions on major national issues" was ranked as more important than "a candidate's ability to do things that help people in the congressional district," by 52-42 percent;
  
• On Social Security, 59 percent "support a system in which you own and control how part of your Social Security retirement money is invested," versus 35 percent who "favor a system in which the federal government has complete control;" and
  
• A "voluntary [prescription drug] system, with coverage options, run by the same kind of companies that provide health care plans for federal government employees" was supported by 54 percent of respondents, while only 31 percent supported a "universal system run by the government."
  

Based on the survey results, voters over age 65 supported Republican candidates by a margin of 56-43. Voters between the ages of 55-64 also supported more Republicans, but by a smaller margin of 48-44.

"Seniors today know clearly, by large percentages, that tax cuts spur the economy, bureaucracies suppress economic growth; that market-based solutions actually solve problems, bureaucratic solutions actually make them worse very often," Jarvis argued.

"The USA post election survey proves that the American voters objection to [the Democrats' agenda] laid the groundwork for the Republicans' historic Election Day success," he said.

E-mail a news tip to Jeff Johnson.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

[Marauder]

I agree. The graphics are shocking and very illustrative, but here's some more facts about abortion in general:
This country has averaged 1.5 MM abortions a year since Roe v. Wade in 1973.
In comparison, Hitler's 6 MM Jews almost matches the non-Jews he also put to death for a grand total of 12 MM souls murdered. Add to that the over 25 MM estimated to have been executed during Stalin's regime for a total of 37 MM. IMHO, these estimates are likely on the high side.
Now for the math on the abortions:
(2002 - 1973) years times 1.5 MM souls aborted = 29 * 1.5 MM = 43,500,000 souls lost to abortion.
Presuming the annual abortion figures are correct, which I accept, we as a nation have outdone two of the bloodiest murderers in the history of the world combined.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Bump the facts!

[Search4Truth]

Where's that picture of a giant can of whoop ass when you need it. Darn it, can't find one.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

ping

[FormerLurker]

And then they wonder why they lose elections...

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

Yep. See the article in post 72.

[LiteKeeper]

Pro-murder