Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Space Plane to Rescue NASA
New Scientist ^ | 14 November 2001 | Jeff Hecht

Posted on 11/17/2002 6:14:30 AM PST by vannrox

NewScientist.com

 
 

Space plane to rescue NASA

 
12:50 14 November 01

Jeff Hecht

 

NASA reshuffled its human space transport programmes on Wednesday, in the hope of solving its most pressing problem - replacing its ageing space shuttle fleet.

The agency had planned to develop a full replacement, but that has now been pushed into the distant future. Spacecraft development will now not begin before 2009. Instead a smaller vehicle called the orbital space plane will be an interim replacement to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station and fill the role of escape capsule.

But its first flight to the ISS is not expected before 2010, leaving a four-year gap from the end in 2006 of the present Russian agreement to supply Soyuz capsules as escape vehicles. Soyuz capsules also are the only alternative to the shuttle for delivering crew members to the station.

Filling that gap is likely to involve extending the life of the space shuttle yet further, and this forms the third part of NASA's new plan. To facilitate the plan, US President George W Bush has asked Congress to shift money within NASA's 2003 budget, though not to increase the total.


Leaking hose

NASA's Integrated Space Transportation Plan will need to succeed in finding shuttle replacements where earlier NASA efforts failed. And each incident like the leaking oxygen hose that delayed this week's planned Endeavour launch is another reminder that the clock is running down fast.

The orbital space plane is needed to fill a crucial hole: a way to return the ISS crew to the ground in case of emergency. Shortly after taking office, the Bush Administration chopped the ISS budget, dropping plans for a crew return vehicle holding up to seven astronauts. That left the ISS crew dependent on the Russian Soyuz modules, which have to be replaced every six months.

The new plan calls for developing a new small winged vehicle launched on new rockets developed by the Pentagon's Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle programme.


Return capsule

NASA documents envision delivering the first space plane to the ISS in 2010, where it would remain as a return capsule. Two years later, NASA wants the space plane to transfer its first crew to the ISS. If successful, the space plane could become the primary vehicle carrying crews to the ISS between 2015 and 2020.

Focusing near-term development on the space plane leaves the program to find a long-term shuttle replacement concentrating on technology until 2009, when development of a new spacecraft would begin.

Finally, the plan calls for more spending on extending the shuttle lifetime and enhancing its safety and reliability. The goal is to keep the shuttle flying for at least another decade, and hold open the option of using it through at least 2020, nearly 40 years after the first shuttle flight.

 
12:50 14 November 01
 

Return to news story

  © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

 



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nasa; plane; rescue; space
The date on the article is 2001, but the Science Central site that I went to listed this as a current event. I suggest that the date is a typo and this is current news. Never the less, I posted it under extended news just in case.
1 posted on 11/17/2002 6:14:30 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I'd bet this is a fig leaf to bring an secret project "out of the black." Remember Reagan talking about an "Orient Express?"
2 posted on 11/17/2002 6:18:44 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The way to save NASA is transfer all military aspects to the Air Force, the scientific aspects to a mix of private companies, foundations, and our national scientific academy(whatever its called), and privatize the commercial aspects.
3 posted on 11/17/2002 8:05:16 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
NASA needs to pick something and go with it already. NASA is one of the few real values we get out of our government, and they need to get a cheaper hauling vehicle.

It costs 1/2 a BILLION $$$ each launch. If they could cut that to less than $100m, imagine how much better things would be.
4 posted on 11/17/2002 8:06:47 AM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
We better get with it, the Pallies are already in the testing phase..


5 posted on 11/17/2002 8:35:43 AM PST by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eno_
 
Boeing Dyna-Soar
The Dyna-Soar was America's first manned spacecraft which actually reached the hardware stage. Conceived in 1957 as a logical next step after the X-15 rocket plane, the Dyna-Soar (originally designated X-20) was based on Eugen Sanger's WWII-era "Silver Bird" concept of a bomber which could skip around the globe on the upper atmosphere.
The USAF saw the Dyna-Soar as their first step into the military use of outer space and planned numerous versions of the ship, including satellite inspection and electronic and photographic intelligence gathering. Later versions were also planned as mini-space stations and "orbital bombers" which could carry "stand-off" nuclear weapons into orbit.
When the project was cancelled in 1963 with only one non-flying mock-up completed, the USAF's astronaut corps shifted into training for the Manned Orbiting Laboratory, or -- in the case of Dyna- Soar trainee Neil Armstrong -- to NASA's civilian projects.
Deep Cold by Dan Roam. All text and images © 2001
6 posted on 11/17/2002 9:18:24 AM PST by larryjohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: ALS
Great pic! ROFL!
8 posted on 11/17/2002 9:59:03 AM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"Cheaper, Better, Faster. Pick any two." -NASA in-joke.

Now we see the fruits of the DEMOCRATS cutting R&D budgets to zero. And they still think it was a great idea. Yet they want to complain about it on the same hand. (And the writers of the article, you, and myself get to sit on the sidelines and watch!)
9 posted on 11/17/2002 2:53:45 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson