The date on the article is 2001, but the Science Central site that I went to listed this as a current event. I suggest that the date is a typo and this is current news. Never the less, I posted it under extended news just in case.
1 posted on
11/17/2002 6:14:30 AM PST by
vannrox
To: vannrox
I'd bet this is a fig leaf to bring an secret project "out of the black." Remember Reagan talking about an "Orient Express?"
2 posted on
11/17/2002 6:18:44 AM PST by
eno_
To: vannrox
The way to save NASA is transfer all military aspects to the Air Force, the scientific aspects to a mix of private companies, foundations, and our national scientific academy(whatever its called), and privatize the commercial aspects.
3 posted on
11/17/2002 8:05:16 AM PST by
Sparta
To: vannrox
NASA needs to pick something and go with it already. NASA is one of the few real values we get out of our government, and they need to get a cheaper hauling vehicle.
It costs 1/2 a BILLION $$$ each launch. If they could cut that to less than $100m, imagine how much better things would be.
4 posted on
11/17/2002 8:06:47 AM PST by
Monty22
To: vannrox
We better get with it, the Pallies are already in the testing phase..
5 posted on
11/17/2002 8:35:43 AM PST by
ALS
To: vannrox
"Cheaper, Better, Faster. Pick any two." -NASA in-joke.
Now we see the fruits of the DEMOCRATS cutting R&D budgets to zero. And they still think it was a great idea. Yet they want to complain about it on the same hand. (And the writers of the article, you, and myself get to sit on the sidelines and watch!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson