Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Company Must Pay Teacher's Widow
Click10.com ^ | 11/14/02

Posted on 11/14/2002 2:37:03 PM PST by correctthought

BREAKING NEWS: Gun Company Must Pay Teacher's Widow Posted: 5:02 p.m. EST November 14, 2002 Updated: 5:31 p.m. EST November 14, 2002

PALM BEACH COUNTY, Fla. -- A jury has awarded the widow of teacher Barry Grunow $1.2 million from a gun distributor. Pam Grunow's lawsuit accused Valor Corp of distributing a gun that was "unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor from using it."

The case stems from the murder of teacher Barry Grunow by one of his students. Nathaniel Brazill shot Grunow to death two years ago in a West Palm Beach classroom.

Pam Grunow's lawyer asked for $76 million. But the jury found gun distributor Valor Corporation 5 percent liable for Grunow's death. The owner of the gun and the school board held the most of the liability, the jury found.

The jury didn't find any liability for Nathanial Brazill, who pulled the trigger. Brazill stole the unloaded gun and bullets from a cookie tin stashed away in a dresser drawer of family friend Elmore McCray.

The jury said Grunow's family should get $24 million from the three parties. The school board was told to pay her $10.8 million, and the family friend was told to pay $12 million.

This is the first lawsuit in the country in which a gun company has in any way been held responsible in a murder.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: fla; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: San Jacinto
"Guns don't kill teachers, Students do."
21 posted on 11/14/2002 3:06:37 PM PST by The SISU kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Unconstitutional and will be rejected on appeal and if not the company should ignore the court and tell them to shove it.
22 posted on 11/14/2002 3:09:35 PM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
The ultimate in stupidity. No, it's not the kid's fault. He only stole an unloaded gun, stole bullets, and shot someone. Nope, no liability there. It's the gun manufacturer's fault. Uh, huh, right.

Maybe you should have been the lawyer defending the gun maker. Their lawyer isn't worth two beans if he or she didn't make this very obvious point to the jury!

Will prosecutors use this same argument against Malvo the Underage Sniper?

23 posted on 11/14/2002 3:11:54 PM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: The SISU kid
Do you suppose there is an index or study on where the dumbest, most thick-headed juries can be found? Palm Beach may now be tied for the lead with Los Angeles (OJ Trial).

On the other hand, a judge with any sense would have thrown out the case to start or ruled for the defense once the lack of evidence was clear.
24 posted on 11/14/2002 3:12:26 PM PST by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty
Their lawyer isn't worth two beans if he or she didn't make this very obvious point to the jury!

The jury, ah the jury.
They that dwell in liberal fury....

I can just imagine how the jury was chosen. "Do you agree that handguns should be outlawed, that the 2nd amendment is outdated, and that the federal government is the organization best suited to run airport security? Good, you're in."

25 posted on 11/14/2002 3:17:58 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Standard liberal BS - blame everyone but the perp!

I sure hope those who are saying this will be overturned on appeal are correct; this is obscene as it stands!

26 posted on 11/14/2002 3:21:54 PM PST by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
I'll get flamed for saying this, but the article omits the fact that the jury consisted of only women. How wrong is this?
27 posted on 11/14/2002 3:24:05 PM PST by drb9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Did a search, didn't see it.

A previous post of the same article was "pulled".

My guess is that too many FReepers came up with comments that accurately described the mental capabilities of that particular set of jurors...

28 posted on 11/14/2002 3:25:56 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
"This had better be reversed. Else, car makers, lawnmower makers, cutlery makers, etc. will be held liable also."

That's why EVERY manufacturer must unite now to demand total tort reform at the federal level.

Will a glut of lawsuits against Anheuser-Busch follow - with greedy trial lawyers and DUI widows seeking to get rich? Or will they sue the carmaker that made the drunk driver's car?

Will a glut of lawsuits by other leftists against other industries they hate - say, econazis against carmakers over pollution - clog U.S. courts over alleged health costs of air pollution?

Scandals of antigun politicians and activists - coast to coast!

29 posted on 11/14/2002 3:28:54 PM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eastbound
utterly random aside;
I have a nice collection of swords.
Strangely enough, the ones that should never be handled by an amateur, Katana, do have child-proof locks on the scabbard.

But this ruling is effed.
30 posted on 11/14/2002 3:29:44 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Appeal. Reversed and remanded. Dismissed with prejudice.
31 posted on 11/14/2002 3:40:35 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drb9
I'm a woman and I won't flame you. I'm saddened but not surprised to hear that. Generally speaking, women are more swayed by appeals to emotion than men.
32 posted on 11/14/2002 3:57:42 PM PST by bleudevil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Yes, it's a bad ruling and a bad signal.

You have Katana? Is that one of those edges that you don't want to rest on bare skin?

33 posted on 11/14/2002 4:01:39 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: glc1173@aol.com
"That's why EVERY manufacturer must unite now..."

If I were a gun manufacturer, I would immediately declare that any guns made by my company that are being used for law enforcement purposes are hereby recalled and deemed defective.

Watch a lawyer cream himself the first time any such declared weapon is discharged in the public arena. It's time to use the courts against themselves.

34 posted on 11/14/2002 4:03:27 PM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
Hey you guys, why are you surprised? Look where it comes from - Palm Beach County, FL. What else would you expect from those idiots?

I suspect that the odds on being overturned are about 110%.
35 posted on 11/14/2002 4:09:28 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: correctthought
"The jury didn't find any liability for Nathanial Brazill."

My guess is no Financial responsibility in the settlement, but I even agree with that.

36 posted on 11/14/2002 5:44:06 PM PST by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson