To: chance33_98
I should hope so! Surely, the country has lost ALL leave of its senses.
To: chance33_98
Don't these folks have anything better to do with their times and resources?
3 posted on
11/13/2002 11:34:10 AM PST by
Tacis
To: chance33_98
Poll Shows Bush Would Beat GorePoll Shows Sun Would Rise In Morning
5 posted on
11/13/2002 11:38:34 AM PST by
Gumlegs
To: chance33_98
Worthless Poll...Bush already beat Gore. Moot Point.
7 posted on
11/13/2002 11:41:34 AM PST by
hattend
To: chance33_98
Slogan over at Quinnipiac University Polling Institute:
No concept too meaningless to poll.
To: chance33_98
Gee. Ya think?
Kinda like, "OMG, there's gambling in Las Vegas, film at 11!" ;-)
VR
13 posted on
11/13/2002 11:44:06 AM PST by
VetsRule
To: chance33_98
It's Quinnipiac. Add 5% to Bush's number.
To: chance33_98
To: chance33_98
Duh!
To: chance33_98
Bush will beat Saddam too.
To: chance33_98
Please! My dead dog could beat Gore by 7 points!
34 posted on
11/13/2002 12:38:15 PM PST by
Bommer
To: chance33_98
Poll Shows Bush Would Beat Gore I DEMAND a recount!
35 posted on
11/13/2002 12:43:06 PM PST by
TankerKC
To: chance33_98
Good news for Bushbots, but it's not a time to get complacent. Poppa Bush saw better approval ratings and re-elect numbers, and went on to get defeated two years later.
If Iraq and the war on terror go off the radar by 2004 and the economy is in the dump, Bush could have a rough re-election fight.
I voted for Bush two years ago, but I'll be looking for a real conservative in '04. I'm tired of GOP lip service on social issues. They talk and talk ... and that's about it.
36 posted on
11/13/2002 12:45:22 PM PST by
JoeMomma
To: chance33_98
You don't say!
To: chance33_98
Except for a reference to "the mommy party" and "the daddy party," by Peggy Noonan, I have not seen any comment on what I think was a very big factor in the psychology of the recent election:
Many, perhaps most, voters had the question in their mind -
perhaps suppressed by some Dems, but there nonetheless - "My G-D! What kind of mess would this country be in after 9-11 if Al Gore (or any other Democrat for that matter) were in charge?" For many the question was also, "Why should I vote for a congressman/governor/etc that will work to elect such a person in the future?"
It can't have escaped notice, even by the wackos on "Democratic Underground" that if the Democrats had not lost the senate and house the other day Saddam would almost certainly not have accepted the Bush (the hell with
the pretense that it was the UN) ultimatum.
To: chance33_98
Bring it on then. I'll have my VCR up and running ready for tapes to record the second loss for Gore.
To: chance33_98
Gore is the most selfish loser I have ever seen. When I saw a newsclip of him campaigning for KKT, I thought he looked like a madman. So glad he does not have the codes and am even more thankful that he is not our president. He is really obessesed with his loss. How many times has he ran for Pres.? It's time for him to go.
40 posted on
11/13/2002 2:04:10 PM PST by
hsmomx3
To: chance33_98
I suppose this means he finally has been elected? :-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson