Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Camera saw figure in bomb truck , Oklahoma City video is unclear, but it may show John Doe No. 2
The Kansas City Star | October 28,1995 | Associated Press

Posted on 11/13/2002 10:39:39 AM PST by honway

The Kansas City Star
October 28, 1995
Section: NATIONAL/WORLD
Edition: METROPOLITAN
Page: A4

Camera saw figure in bomb truck

Oklahoma City video is unclear, but it may show John Doe No. 2.

The Associated Press

OKLAHOMA CITY - Videotape from a surveillance camera captured a glimpse of a shadowy figure in the passenger seat of a bomb-laden Ryder truck minutes before it blew apart the federal building, a federal law enforcement source says.

The footage is not clear enough to identify anyone, but it adds to the body of evidence that a third figure - perhaps the long-sought John Doe No. 2 - took part in the attack with two other persons, the source said.

``There's a shape in there, but they can't see a face,'' the source said of footage, which was taken by a camera on a nearby apartment building. The camera picked up the shadowy passenger about three minutes before the bomb went off April 19 at the Murrah Federal Building.

The government says Timothy McVeigh drove to Oklahoma City in the truck, parked it in front of the federal building and made his getaway in a yellow Mercury Marquis. But prosecutors have given no indication that Terry Nichols, also charged in the case, was in Oklahoma City the day of the bombing.

Although a federal grand jury indicted only McVeigh and Nichols on murder and conspiracy charges, agents scoured the country for a third conspirator, known only as John Doe No. 2, who was portrayed in sketches distributed shortly after the blast.

Authorities later said that an innocent Army private resembled the sketches. But the drawings were never withdrawn. Moreover, the indictment accuses McVeigh and Nichols of acting with ``others unknown,'' and agents were still hunting for other conspirators.

A call Friday to Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Mullins, a spokesman for the prosecution team, was not returned immediately.

Prosecutors repeatedly refused to discuss surveillance tape or other evidence in the case.

McVeigh's lawyer, Stephen Jones, said he had not seen the tape and could not comment.

A senior federal official in Washington said recently that agents currently searching did not expect to turn up another key player in the plot.

The law enforcement source, however, said many investigators remained convinced that John Doe No. 2 was still at large.

McVeigh and Nichols go on trial May 17.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fredthompson; johndoe2; okcbombing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Gary Boldwater
Is it John Doe or Mohammed Doe?

Based on the eyewitness statements, Mohammed Doe is closer to the mark.

21 posted on 11/13/2002 11:38:17 AM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: honway
It means that the clinton administration betrayed America....in every respect, bar none.
22 posted on 11/13/2002 11:43:46 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honway
"saw figure"
"video is unclear"
"may show"

The most important parts of the title. Which lead to me skipping the article.

Bring me proof....not endless machination.
23 posted on 11/13/2002 11:48:44 AM PST by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
Ya think?

Not likely...

TXnMA (No Longer!!!)

24 posted on 11/13/2002 11:50:11 AM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend; twigs
Preliminary Hearing - McVeigh April 27, 1995

Additional Video Surveillance Footage – McVeigh Preliminary Hearing 4-27-95

Testimony from FBI agent Jon Hersley, who states there’s video he’s seen from one of the Regency Towers cameras, date and time stamped. This is not the same camera that looks out the front door of the Regency Towers in which we see the Ryder truck come into view, pause and move on.

This camera takes “scans in front of the Tower building and also over towards the parking lot”, across the street from the Murrah Building.

The testimony discusses various witnesses who saw McVeigh, including one who states he saw a yellow Mercury speed off in the vicinity of the parking lot, then goes on to discuss a photo still taken from the video in which is seen a light colored car in that same vicinity.

McVeigh Preliminary Hearing, April 27 1995.

From the transcript:

Q. In your review of the surveillance photos, did you find any surveillance photos of that parking lot across the street from the Murrah Building?

A. Yes.

Q. Okay.

A. You characterized that as my review of the photographs. I was shown those particular photographs by Agent Lamar.

Q. Have you been shown a photograph of that particular parking lot, sir, across the street from the Murrah Building that includes the speeding Mercury in the photograph?

A. We don't know for sure yet. Those photographs are not real clear. They are taken from a pretty good distance away. There appears to be a light-colored car in the very vicinity where this witness testifies -- or provides the information was speeding away from. We are not able to determine yet if that is in fact the yellow Mercury.

Q. The pictures that you saw of that particular parking lot -- now I'm talking about the parking lot across the street from the Murrah Building --

A. Right.

Q. -- in a northerly direction, that parking lot, there is film of that parking lot prior to the time of the explosion?

A. Yes.

Q. Correct?

A. Yes.

Q. Is it time-stamped so that you can tell a particular time of day on the 19th of April that that camera is viewing, scanning that parking lot?

A. Yes.

Q. Can you tell me where that particular camera was located?

A. I believe that particular camera was located on the apartment building there that we have been speaking of.

Q. So those were some more pictures from the Regency?

A. Yes, those are the pictures from the Regency.

Q. So the camera from the Regency -- is this the camera at the very top of the Regency Tower?

A. I don't know the exact location of the camera, but it kind of scans that whole area there, is what has been represented to me. It scans in front of the Tower building and also over towards the parking lot.



25 posted on 11/13/2002 11:51:02 AM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Drango
YES, People we have a Match
27 posted on 11/13/2002 12:07:04 PM PST by cav68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: *OKCbombing
Ping
28 posted on 11/13/2002 12:14:56 PM PST by Sunshine55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: *OKCbombing
Ping
29 posted on 11/13/2002 12:16:48 PM PST by Sunshine55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
A letter from Grand Juror Hoppy Heidelberg to Judge David L. Russell October 5, 1995

Judge David L. Russell 1210 Federal Court House 200 N.W. 4th Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Dear Judge Russell:

Pursuant to instructions from lead prosecutor, Joseph Hartzler, I write you this letter to express my concerns about the Oklahoma City bombing investigation. January is coming upon us fast and I am concerned that there will then be no one in authority with sufficient motivation to pursue the case.

The families of the victims deserve to know who all was involved in the bombing, and there appears to be an attempt to protect the identity of certain suspects, namely John Doe II, evidenced by the following:

1) The hoax perpetrated by authorities that John Doe II was a Ft. Riley private who rented a truck on a different day. The Ft. Riley private was not with Tim McVeigh, nor does he remotely resemble the police sketch of John Doe II.

2) The lack of witnesses relating to John Doe II, namely:

a) the manager of the Great Western Inn on I-70 in Junction City, Kansas, where John Doe II registered using a foreign name and reportedly stayed in room #107. This manager apparently reported that John Doe II spoke in broken English and was driving the mystery "second Ryder truck." Strangely, this manager has reportedly "disappeared" and cannot be found;

b) the Elliott's Body Shop employee that reportedly gave the FBI artist the description of Tim McVeigh and John Doe II. The McVeigh sketch was almost perfect and there is no reason to doubt that the John Doe II sketch is less so;

c) the Oklahoma City tire shop employee who saw John Doe II in the Ryder truck with McVeigh shortly before the explosion.

3) The lack of the use of the John Doe II sketch in interviewing witnesses that had apparently seen him in locations other than those previously acknowledged.

Perhaps a new Grand Jury should be empaneled in 1996 dedicated to this investigation. If so, I suggest the following list of witnesses that need to be subpoenaed for testimony:

1) The manager (at the time of the Oklahoma City bombing) of the Great Western Inn on I-70 in Junction City, Kansas, if he is still alive and can be found.

2) The Ft. Riley private identified by authorities as John Doe II.

3) Architects, structural engineers and explosive experts selected by the Grand Jury.

4) Area seismologists and geophysicists, including Ray Brown.

5) All video surveillance tapes from cameras near the Murrah Building, including the one made by a Southwestern Bell camera which reportedly shows John Doe II getting out of the Ryder truck before McVeigh drove it to the Murrah Building.

6) Ralph McPeak, Jr.

7) Vickie Beemer

8) Tom Kissinger

9) Hilda Sostra

10) Mike Moroz

11) James Rosencrans

Time may be of the essence before witnesses disappear or lose their memories or their materials. The truth is as important to you as it is to me, I trust; therefore your response will be eagerly awaited.

Very truly yours,

Hoppy Heidelberg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The response to Hoppy Heidelberg from Judge David L. Russell

David L. Russell, Chief Judge United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma 200 N.W. 4th Street Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102

October 24, 1995

Mr. Hoppy Heidelberg

Re: U.S.A. v. Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols: Case No. CR-95-110-A; and U.S.A. v. Michael Fortier, Case No. CR-95-111-R, United States District Court-Western District of Oklahoma

Dear Mr. Heidelberg:

Effective immediately, you are dismissed from the grand jury. Your obligation of secrecy continues. Any disclosure of matters that occurred before the grand jury constitutes a contempt of court. Each violation of the obligation of secrecy may be punished cumulatively.

Sincerely,

David L. Russell United States District Judge

30 posted on 11/13/2002 12:27:07 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: honway
Honway, Another excellent example of how the OKC Bombing case has destroyed my faith that any grand jury will be allowed by their handlers to get anywhere near the truth.

The toxic combination of intefering prosecutors and biased judges can steer even the most conscientious set of citizen-jurors offf into never-never land. And when all else fails, they can dump them -- as Russell did Hoppy.

"Justice" and "Honor" -- ain't no such animals -- they's extinct 'round these here parts!

31 posted on 11/13/2002 1:00:49 PM PST by TXnMA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: thinden; Lion's Cub
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/11/8/185013.shtml

Release the Videotapes
Notra Trulock
Saturday, Nov. 9, 2002

Twice in recent months, Patterson has reported that Chairman Dan Burton's House Government Reform Committee investigators have uncovered the possible whereabouts of videotapes and photographs of the Murrah Federal Building from the day of the bombing. The Final Report of the Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee (OKBIC) noted the existence of such tapes, but the Justice Department has adamantly refused to release them, even in response to Freedom of Information Act requests.

Burton believes that the tapes and photographs may be held in the archives of Naval Intelligence at the Washington Navy Yard and he has issued a subpoena to the Secretary of the Navy to obtain them. The tapes are said to contain video of a John Doe Number Two getting out on the passenger side of the Ryder truck just prior to the explosion.

Former FBI Deputy Director Weldon Kennedy told the Philadelphia Inquirer that talk of withheld videotapes is "ludicrous and insulting." Kennedy says that agents nailed down "98 to 99 percent" of McVeigh and Nichols' movements in the months before the bombing and he is absolutely convinced they acted alone.

32 posted on 11/13/2002 1:03:03 PM PST by honway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
As with the downing of Flight #800, the clinton administration did not want to be forced into action.

Exactly as with the bombing at the Olympics.

Pretend it's domestic so he can continue on with his diddling while national security was eroded with 9/11 the ultimate result of such perfidy.

33 posted on 11/13/2002 1:28:25 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Dr.Pepper Drinker
Whenever a videotape does not mach LEOs story, it conveniently is lost. Big cases and small.
34 posted on 11/13/2002 1:46:43 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: honway
Drip, drip, drip.
35 posted on 11/13/2002 1:51:43 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honway
"... archives of Naval Intelligence at the Washington Navy Yard and he has issued a subpoena to the Secretary of the Navy to obtain them. The tapes are said to contain video of a John Doe Number Two getting out on the..."

A rather curious depository, isnt it ?

36 posted on 11/13/2002 2:24:22 PM PST by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: honway
Betcha dollars to donuts John Doe was really Mohammed Atta practicing his drill pre 9-11.
37 posted on 11/13/2002 2:25:31 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
the missing surveilance tapes are bad, but has anyone else heard that all the STEEL BEAMS from the WTC have been removed and then RECYCLED before investigators had the chance to examine them.
38 posted on 11/13/2002 2:36:47 PM PST by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: honway
"..Former FBI Deputy Director Weldon Kennedy told the Philadelphia Inquirer that talk of withheld videotapes is "ludicrous and insulting." Kennedy says that agents nailed down "98 to 99 percent" of McVeigh and Nichols' movements in the months before the bombing and he is absolutely convinced they acted alone."

The FBI was absolutely convinced that the FBI did not fire pyrotechnical flares at the Davidians at Waco--until the Texas Rangers found proof that that the FBI was lying.

39 posted on 11/13/2002 2:54:00 PM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: honway
be back bump.
40 posted on 11/13/2002 2:56:13 PM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson