Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marxist's Apartment A Microcosm Of Why Marxism Doesn't Work
Onion ^

Posted on 11/12/2002 5:34:41 PM PST by SamAdams76

LIFESTYLES


Marxists' Apartment A Microcosm Of Why Marxism Doesn't Work

AMHERST, MA—The filthy, disorganized apartment shared by three members of the Amherst College Marxist Society is a microcosm of why the social and economic utopia described in the writings of Karl Marx will never come to fruition, sources reported Monday.

Above: Marxists Kirk Dorff and Josh Foyle.
Above: Marxists Kirk Dorff and Josh Foyle.

"The history of society is the inexorable history of class struggle," said sixth-year undergraduate Kirk Dorff, 23, resting his feet on a coffee table cluttered with unpaid bills, crusted cereal bowls, and bongwater-stained socialist pamphlets. "The stage is set for the final struggle between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, the true productive class. We're well aware of that here at 514 W. Elm Street, unlike other apartments on this supposedly intellectual campus."

Upon moving in together at the beginning of the fall 2001 semester, Dorff, Josh Foyle, and Tom Eaves sat down and devised an egalitarian system for harmonious living. Each individual roommate would be assigned a task, which he would be required to carry out on a predetermined day of the week. A bulletin board in the kitchen was chosen as the spot for household announcements, and to track reimbursements for common goods like toothpaste and toilet paper.

"We were creating an exciting new model for living," said Dorff, stubbing his cigarette into an ashtray that had not been emptied in six days. "It was like we were dismantling the apparatus of the state right within our own living space."

Despite the roommates' optimism, the system began to break down soon after its establishment. To settle disputes, the roommates held weekly meetings of the "Committee of Three."

"I brought up that I thought it was total bullshit that I'm, like, the only one who ever cooks around here, yet I have to do the dishes, too," said Foyle, unaware of just how much the apartment underscores the infeasibility of scientific socialism as outlined in Das Kapital. "So we decided that if I cook, someone else has to do the dishes. We were going to rotate bathroom-cleaning duty, but then Kirk kept skipping his week, so we had to give him the duty of taking out the garbage instead. But now he has a class on Tuesday nights, so we switched that with the mopping."

After weeks of complaining that he was the only one who knew how to clean "halfway decent," Foyle began scaling back his efforts, mirroring the sort of production problems experienced in the USSR and other Soviet bloc nations.

At an Oct. 7 meeting of the Committee of Three, more duties and a point system were added. Two months later, however, the duty chart is all but forgotten and the shopping list is several pages long.

 Above: Dishes and seminal Marxist tracts pile up in the kitchen sink.
Above: Dishes and seminal Marxist tracts pile up in the kitchen sink.

The roommates have also tried to implement a food-sharing system, with similarly poor results. The dream of equal distribution of shared goods quickly gave way to pilferage, misallocation, and hoarding.

"I bought the peanut butter the first four times, and this Organic Farms shit isn't cheap," Eaves said. "So ever since, I've been keeping it in my dresser drawer. If Kirk wants to make himself a sandwich, he can run to the corner store and buy some Jif."

Another failed experiment involves the cigarettes bought collectively. Disagreements constantly arose over who smoked more than his fair share of the group's supply of American Spirit Blues, and the roommates now hide individually purchased packs from each other—especially late at night when shortages are frequent.

The situation is familiar to Donald Browning, author of Das Kouch: A History Of College Marxism, 1970-1998.

"When workers willfully become less productive, the economy of the household suffers," Browning said. "But in a society where a range of ability naturally exists, someone is bound to object to picking up the slack for others and end up getting all pissy, like Josh does."

According to Browning, the group's lack of productivity pervades their lives, with roommates encouraging each other to skip class or work to sit on the couch smoking pot and talking politics.

"A spirit of free-market competition in the house would likely result in better incomes or better grades," Browning said. "Then, instead of being hated and ostracized by the world at large as socialist countries usually are, they could maintain effective diplomacy with their landlord, their parents, and Kirk's boss who cut back his hours at Shaman Drum Books."

The lack of funds and the resulting scarcity breeds not only discontent but also corruption. Although collectivism only works when all parties contribute to the fullest extent, Foyle hid the existence of a $245 paycheck from roommates so he would not have to pay his back rent, in essence refusing to participate in the forced voluntary taxation that is key to socialism. Even worse, Dorff, who is entrusted with bill collection and payment, recently pocketed $30, a theft he claimed was "for the heating bill" but was put toward buying drinks later that night.

"As is human nature, power tends to corrupt even the noblest of men," Browning said. "The more power the collective has over the lives of the individuals, as is the case in this household, the more he who is in charge of distribution has to gain by being unscrupulous. These Marxists will soon realize they overestimated how much control they would like 514 W. Elm as an entity to have."




TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: jessejackson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: SamAdams76
Funny.
21 posted on 11/12/2002 6:23:27 PM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
An instant classic, one of their best. I also thought last week's lobster commentary was a gem.
22 posted on 11/12/2002 6:32:45 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
"resting his feet on a coffee table cluttered with unpaid bills, crusted cereal bowls, and bongwater-stained Frederic Bastiat, F.A. Hayek, and Ludwig von Mises pamphlets."

With a little sleight of hand, I've turned it into a LIBERTINES' apartment.

It would make just as much sense to say:

"resting his feet on a coffee table cluttered with unpaid bills, crusted cereal bowls, and bongwater-stained William F. Buckley, Edmund Burke, and Rush Limbaugh pamphlets."

With a little sleight of hand, I've turned it into a CONSERVATIVES' apartment.

Neither version makes a lick of sense. But that obviously doesn't stop someone who would rather bash libertarians, who agree with conservatives 80-90% of the time, than liberals, who agree with conservatives 10-20% of the time.

Go ahead, keep it up. Set back your own cause. Libertarians cost several Republicans their election last week. Keep on alienating them, in favor of "conservatives" who see nothing wrong with increasing government size and spending, and thereby driving even more of them away.

23 posted on 11/12/2002 6:40:48 PM PST by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Unfortunately, you guys have been to that well too often. Conservatives now completely discount your support. You wouldn't vote GOP if Bush promised to make Harry Browne Ambassador to the Vatican.

Get that? WE DON'T NEED OR WANT YOUR SUPPORT ANY MORE.

24 posted on 11/12/2002 7:09:54 PM PST by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
Op Ed Photo

I liked the "Freddie The Lobster" one too. Bummer I couldn't post it here because of the foul language.

25 posted on 11/12/2002 7:53:44 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Libertarians cost several Republicans their election last week

They most certainly DO NOT cost anyone anything.

The prime message of all third parties is that there is no difference between the two major parties. That is their whole game. They say over and over their is not a dimes worth of difference between the Democrats and Republicans.

What studies have shown is that all third parties are the same. If the third party has a candidate they vote for the third party candidate. If the third party does not have a candidate a lot of them don't vote at all. And the remainder split their votes between the two parties. If the Libertarians don't have a candidate about half of them will teach the Repubicans a LESSON by voting for the Democrat and the remainder will vote for the Republican.

Splinter parties are of zero value to either party.

Look at the Greens. People would think that every Green would prefer (earth in the balance) Gore to Bush. But 2.8 Greens voted for Nader to teach Gore a lesson. But if Nader had not run 1.4 million Greens would have voted for Bush to teach Gore a lesson and the rest would have voted for Gore.

They would not have changed the outcome at all.

The Libertarians try to fool the Republicans all the time. But they fool no one in the party. They don't help and they don't hurt. The are completely a non factor in every race.

26 posted on 11/12/2002 8:03:06 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
,,, obviously a little too early to discuss redistribution of wealth using this example as a model.

Ah, but something has to be distributed equally. And sooner or later, they'll hit on the solution that all socialist systems eventually come up with - just make everyone equally poor ;)

27 posted on 11/12/2002 8:14:18 PM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
"The Libertarians try to fool the Republicans all the time. But they fool no one in the party. They don't help and they don't hurt. The are completely a non factor in every race."

Good. Now that thats settled, we can stop with the libertarian bashing and get back on post and to the Onion and it's socialism bashing.

28 posted on 11/12/2002 8:21:02 PM PST by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: austinTparty
"...are you running with the Buchanan anti-capitalists these days?"

LOL! Ouch...I felt that one all the way over here!

29 posted on 11/12/2002 8:34:47 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
"But that obviously doesn't stop someone who would rather bash libertarians, who agree with conservatives 80-90% of the time," but still cause the loss of several Senate seats per year to the tax and spend party.
30 posted on 11/12/2002 8:55:23 PM PST by Uncle Miltie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
This isn't a perfect analogy - but it fits for those fictional socialists.


31 posted on 11/12/2002 8:55:30 PM PST by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
They [Liberarians] most certainly DO NOT cost anyone anything.

You may, of course, continue to believe that if you wish, even in the face of convincing evidence to the contrary. The best case is the Senate race in Georgia in 1992, in which neither major party candidate got a victory (they were virtually tied, and the Libertarian pulled three percent. In the runoff, the Libertarian candidate endorsed the Republican, who then won by a 51%-49% margin.

Now, I don't like many things the Libertarian party does (especially their ostrich-like foreign policy), and it is amateurishly run. But to claim they have no effect on close races is to fly in the face of the facts. You may believe that attracting the libertarian votes would cause a drop in moderate votes attracted, and that may be true, but I think it's debatable.

If the Libertarians don't have a candidate about half of them will teach the Repubicans a LESSON by voting for the Democrat and the remainder will vote for the Republican.

In my experience this is flat-out wrong, and I challenge you to find any hard data to support it. I hang around with quite a few LP party members. If they have no LP candidate, they choose Republican over Democrat by at least a 2-1 margin (the same margin the Georgia Senate race suggested, by the way.)

32 posted on 11/13/2002 2:59:42 AM PST by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Tsk, tsk, Illbay. We need EVERY Americans support. When we start discounting others and their beliefs then we are no better than those we oppose.
33 posted on 11/13/2002 8:05:29 AM PST by dixie sass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Looked like a pretty expensive guitiar(sp) in the back ground! Was that a capitalist present? Ah Dah! heheheheh
34 posted on 11/13/2002 1:23:15 PM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
ping
35 posted on 11/14/2002 3:02:08 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
so true
36 posted on 11/14/2002 10:58:16 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson