Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: backhoe
I have run the subject of vote fraud in South Dakota through GoogleNews. There is an interesting split. The in-state papers all say, as does this article, that the fraud did not affect the election. The out-of-state papers all say the opposite.

Denial, in short, is the defense mode within the state. But if South Dakota officials are not willing or able to get to the bottom of this and produce honest and reliable results from their election, the US Senate can do the job for them. The Senate has the power to refuse Johnson and seat Thune because of corruption in the S.D. election, regardless of whether S.D. ignores the corruption and claims that Johnson was the winner.

Congressman Billybob

"to Restore Trust in America"

38 posted on 11/12/2002 5:44:21 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
Appreciate your comments and link... this?

The Senate has the power to refuse Johnson and seat Thune because of corruption in the S.D. election, regardless of whether S.D. ignores the corruption and claims that Johnson was the winner.

Jarred loose some half-forgotten lessons from school long ago. Let's hope they will do the right thing.

40 posted on 11/12/2002 6:00:39 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson