Posted on 11/11/2002 10:13:34 AM PST by John Lenin
You know, I'm not so sure about that. I just don't think its proponents had a clue just where that was really going. Let's face it, a world with only one superpower that is behaving so fundamentally differently from the old imperial model as we are, constitutes a sea change in history. It may be better or worse, and Lord only knows where it's going, but I think it's unarguably different.
I remember those hippy days well. We all thought the Age of Aquarius meant free pot, free lunch, free love. If, instead, it merely means "free," then I'd say we've gained something much more precious.
I rejected it and though I had long hair and wore Indian beads, I had an answer to the two fingered peace sign. It was a three fingered peace sign that basically said , peace but screw you anyway.
Freedom was the issue, but it was a freedom from societal restrictions, and it wasn't obvious to those for whom that was the motive that a move to collectivism threatened that even more than the existing societal restrictions. In fact, the trend to collectivism/socialism on the part of the hippies was profoundly reactive - it was seen as the only available alternative to hung-up society. For a lot of folks on the left that's still the case. Now there's the additional element that socialism/collectivism is so entrenched in academia that it is an Establishment all its own, to be reacted to toward freedom just as the original move toward it was reactive on the part of the young leftists of the 60s. Unfortunately it has a large element of anarchism grafted onto it - that, too, is reactive. It is very difficult for the young to embark on truly new territory - they haven't the background to recognize it when it isn't. You can't tell them that, though.
Never miss an opportunity to bash the LP on the pot issue, huh, CJ?
As you're no doubt well aware, libertarians in and out of the party do not support "moral liberalism" as much as they oppose the shredding of the Constitution by federal jackbooted thugs in the name of the insane and unwinnable War on Drugs. And, as you are also well aware, marijuana was not under the jurisdiction of the feds until 1937 when it was New Deal politics (i.e. Commerce Clause twisting) cloaked in "Reefer Madness" hysteria that pushed the unconstitutional "Marihuana Tax Act" through Congress for FDR's signature.
That was 32 years before Woodstock: long before hippies, counterculture, love beads, Vietnam, Timothy Leary, etc. etc. etc., but at the beginning of the rise of socialism in America.
Of course, you probably already know that - you've been told about these indisputable historical facts many times on this board, and you choose to ignore them. Every time.
Did they leave in the part where "Bush" said, "Oh, by the way: Senator Jeffords, welcome to Hell."?
George: You know, this used to be a helluva good country.
I can't understand what's gone wrong with it..
Billy: Huh. Man, everybody got chicken, that's what happened, man. Hey, we can't even get into like, uh, second-rate hotel, I mean, a second-rate motel. You dig? They think we're gonna cut their throat or something, man. They're scared, man..
George: Oh, they're not scared of you. They're scared of what you represent to 'em..
Billy: Hey man. All we represent to them, man, is somebody needs a haircut..
George: Oh no. What you represent to them is freedom..
Billy: What the hell's wrong with freedom, man? That's what it's all about..
George: Oh yeah, that's right, that's what it's all about, all right. But talkin' about it and bein' it - that's two different things. I mean, it's real hard to be free when you are bought and sold in the marketplace. 'Course, don't ever tell anybody that they're not free 'cause then they're gonna get real busy killin' and maimin' to prove to you that they are. Oh yeah, they're gonna talk to you, and talk to you, and talk to you about individual freedom, but they see a free individual, it's gonna scare 'em..
Billy: Mmmm, well, that don't make 'em runnin' scared..
George: No, it makes 'em dangerous.
I couldn't agree more...
Sometimes it takes a crisis to point out the sheer paucity of the liberal platform, its embarrassing paltriness, and the Left's patent inability to handle anything more demanding than protecting pregnant pigs.
While we reelected Jeb and gave him a republican legislature, the citizens of my fine state also passed a constitutional amendment (!) to protect pregnant pigs. Seriously.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.