Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now there is a program to introduce the Red Wolf at Land Between the Lakes in Kentucky. I have seen the results of introducing them in Wyoming, Montanna and Idaho. Not saying it can't be done, but it sure needs to be supervised closely. The federal government needs to stay out of the wolf business.
1 posted on 11/10/2002 6:27:17 AM PST by SLB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SLB
Does anyone know the efforts to re-introduce the wolf in Adirondeck state park in NY?
2 posted on 11/10/2002 6:36:44 AM PST by inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
"Wildlife officials like to say that understanding the science behind an environmental problem and finding a solution to it are the simple parts."

So what problem would the re-introductiion of the wolf solve? It seems to me that the established environmental fact is that the habitat does not support the wolf or it would be there.....
3 posted on 11/10/2002 6:55:13 AM PST by Plain Old American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
This is part of the war on Rural America. They are going to drive us all off the land.
4 posted on 11/10/2002 6:58:03 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
Now there is a program to introduce the Red Wolf at Land Between the Lakes in Kentucky.

Thanks for the post. Have bookmarked for reference

We don't need the Red Wolf in Kentucky. They won't remain where introduced but will spread much like the Coyote has. Then we've got a serious problem essentially statewide.

What can be predicted is hikers or campers are going to be attacked. Perhaps that's what the Greenies are counting on to keep people out of large protected areas? Wouldn't surprise me.

We may find life becomes more exciting for those of us who hunt varmits. A new adversary.

5 posted on 11/10/2002 7:01:09 AM PST by toddst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
They are certainly magnificent animals. See nothing wrong in having preserves for them but once they leave; they are fair game.
6 posted on 11/10/2002 7:07:51 AM PST by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
Destroying the cattle industry was the major reason behind this in the first place. The hatred of environmentalists for modern food production is legendary. They frequently like to talk about the necessity of reducing Earth's population by 80% through the control of food production. Simply put, their intention is to starve 5 billion people to death.
9 posted on 11/10/2002 7:49:53 AM PST by Seruzawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
Yes, yes! I've heard that they through babies on their bayonettes!
12 posted on 11/10/2002 8:01:17 AM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
I believe there is a solution to the reintroduction of the wolf in my state. It's called shoot and shovel. Just another example of our tax dollars at work through the wisdom of the uncontrollable DNR.
17 posted on 11/10/2002 8:45:21 AM PST by giznort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
There is supposed to be compensation paid for the livestock lost to the reintroduced wolves in WI, $1K/per cattle. This story is very fishy. Mr. Fornengo must have recieved a significant part(almost all and more likely more) of that $50K loss, or he'd definitely be out of his farm. That $50K approaches 50 cattle. I did hear the DNR was using the compensation money for new cars, ect...

If the greens want to hear howling and such, they can afford to pay to feed their performers. Else they should shut up when other folks fling lead at 'em. Seems all the pot lickers like to band together to protect their endangered enterprises.

23 posted on 11/10/2002 10:35:43 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB
"We have coyotes. We have fox. We have fishers. We have a lot of predators in this area," he says. "It's nice to have the wolf around . . . you've got to have balance."

It's NICE to have the wolf around? You numbskull!!

You obviously don't care for human life.

The guy I know who came upon a wolf munching on the still-warm remains of his 8-year-old son would probably disagree with you.

24 posted on 11/10/2002 11:03:34 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SLB; AuntB; comwatch; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Jeff Head; madfly; MadIvan; Alamo-Girl; ...
Dangers of the ESA being exposed.....I strongly support shoot, shovel, and shut up.

This article points out the danger when the greenies and the NGO groups ramrod BS down people's throats.

26 posted on 11/10/2002 11:13:39 AM PST by Issaquahking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson