Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Dianne Feinstein Is the Democrats' best hope to win the 2004 presidential election
SF Chronicle ^ | 11-10-02 | Richard Rapaport

Posted on 11/10/2002 3:45:08 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:21 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

As the Democrats begin to recover from the bloodletting of Tuesday's elections, it's time for the party to get serious about recapturing the White House two years hence.

For the Democrats to avenge the loss of the Senate, as well as the presidential debacle of 2000, they must overcome the timidity and disconnection that has characterized party leadership. They should forget about any Al Gore comeback with a fairy tale ending. They should also dispense with the seven political dwarfs who want to be president -- Sens. John Kerry, Joseph Lieberman, John Edwards, Tom Daschle and Joseph Biden; Congressman Richard Gephardt and possibly Gov. Gray Davis, on the heels of his unresounding reelection victory Tuesday.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2004; democrat; feinstein; meltdown; rats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
The RATS are a completely dysfunctional political party. Am I the only person to notice that our "selected", "low IQ" President not only delivered a GOP majority but also put the entire DNC establishment on suicide watch?
1 posted on 11/10/2002 3:45:08 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I don't even have to read this one: Please run Diane!

This would make the Bush victory all the more lop-sided!

2 posted on 11/10/2002 3:48:18 AM PST by twntaipan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gee, can I have some of whatever this guy, the author, is smoking? Wow.
3 posted on 11/10/2002 3:53:36 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Sure, terrific idea, run Feinstein. A Senator, when governors are the toughest competition. A Californian when that state is already a given. And someone on film abjectly apologizing to the Chinese after the EP-3 plane was downed by them.

As I recall, George W. Bush ran against a sitting woman Governor of Texas, Ann Richards, to win his first elective office. He didn't have any trouble figuring out how to beat her. He killed her with politeness.

4 posted on 11/10/2002 3:54:21 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Yea, she will deliver all those precious electoral votes on the left coast, some scattered few in the Northeast, leaving "W" comfortably with 350-380 EVs.

Good strategy!
5 posted on 11/10/2002 3:55:56 AM PST by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"She's America's political Snow White."

More like Medusa.
6 posted on 11/10/2002 3:56:04 AM PST by Schmedlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
Well, the Dems could always let Dubya run unopposed in 2004, and then they'd probably do better in the other races.
7 posted on 11/10/2002 3:57:14 AM PST by patriciaruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Am I the only person to notice that our "selected", "low IQ" President not only delivered a GOP majority but also put the entire DNC establishment on suicide watch?"

No, you aren't. :)

Let.........ahem............."Snow White" run. Please.

8 posted on 11/10/2002 3:57:22 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
While there is a bunch of baloney in this article, there ia also some truth. DiFi probably would be a tough candidate, tougher than any of the others mentioned.
9 posted on 11/10/2002 3:58:04 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
More than that, a Feinstein nomination -- two long decades after the false dawn of Geraldine Ferraro -- would signal the first true "Year of the Woman" since universal suffrage was achieved (for whites at least) in 1920.

The first woman to capture the presidential nomination of a major party will be a figure who transcends party labels. She will, inevitably, come to embody the unfulfilled hopes of generations of American women.

A Feinstein candidacy would be a nightmare for Republican strategists. Be too harsh in attacking the first woman with a chance to be elected president and risk alienating American women. Give Feinstein a free ride and she will kill you.

Yes, a female candidate would be an unstoppable juggernaut. Which is why there have been so many female candidates before now. </sarcasm>

10 posted on 11/10/2002 3:59:15 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
They really, really wouldn't. They would be so demoralized Bush would sweep almost every race.
11 posted on 11/10/2002 4:01:55 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Feinstein - Pelosi......an all female, all liberal, all San Francisco ticket..........The San Francisco treat/or trick.
12 posted on 11/10/2002 4:04:20 AM PST by stocksthatgoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ah, yes, Dianne Feinstein, the ultimate gun control candidate will do well in fly-over country. This is the woman who said if she had the votes, she'd tell all American's to turn in their guns. Yep, she's a great candidate.
13 posted on 11/10/2002 4:10:11 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
About all that DiFi has going for her is she's to the right of fellow California Democrat and soul sister Babs Boxer who is ultra-left --- and unelectable on a national ticket. She'd face fierce competition from the party's governors and to my knowledge, no legislator from Capitol Hill has won the presidential nomination of either major party in the last century. The reason is executive experience. The Dems have plenty of women govs they can field for President but DiFi's a long shot.
14 posted on 11/10/2002 4:10:16 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
that means they have NO hope
15 posted on 11/10/2002 4:10:30 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
People likely to dismiss her because of her religion would probably also be put off by her gender

Not necessarily. This assumes the bigots are white redneck types. But there is an undercurrent of anti-semitism in some parts of the black community (especially the Muslims). This wouldn't be so important, except that blacks are an important part of the Democratic base. The assumption that anti-Semites are all white is racist in and of itself. I'm not suggesting that most blacks are anti-semites, but that it exists in people of all colors.

Some progressive black leaders have used anti-Semitism to further their agenda, like Jesse "Hymietown" Jackson and Al Sharpton.

16 posted on 11/10/2002 4:10:46 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
She's America's political Snow White.

From the party of diversity, an eastern elitist for minority leader who told a black guy to forget it, and now Snow White.

The first thing to do for 2004 is to start with pamphlets among minorities showing them the true colors of the democRATS-white priveleged women.

17 posted on 11/10/2002 4:12:27 AM PST by RWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan
If she runs and her closet is opened, an avalanche of trouble will fall out for her and her husband.
We can only PRAY she runs.
18 posted on 11/10/2002 4:14:23 AM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"One other woman also has the stature to bear the Democratic standard in 2004: Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York. But only Feinstein can win. The former first lady bears the stigma of eight years' of smears by the demonic right. Hillary Clinton versus Bush II would be a bloodbath, and the Clinton campaign would be the target of the same venomous character assassins who nearly brought down her husband."

Can someone believe anyone would be able to attack St. Hillary on the basis of character.

19 posted on 11/10/2002 4:14:25 AM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
I forgot all about the gun issue, that is a big loser for her.

Not the finger on the trigger. Very sloppy... and yet so very erotic, at the same time. </kidding>

20 posted on 11/10/2002 4:14:42 AM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson