Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heed Mondale, Al Gore, don't run
Houston Chronicle ^ | November 09, 2002 | MARIANNE (BARF ALERT) MEANS

Posted on 11/09/2002 10:46:54 AM PST by Dog Gone

THE stunning political mandate President Bush won on Tuesday sends former Vice President Al Gore a timely message: Do the Democratic Party a favor by declining to run against Bush again in two years.

The president's congressional triumph does not mean he will automatically be re-elected in 2004. Much can happen between now and then. But it means that the past is no longer the present for the Democrats. They need a new message and new candidates if they are to overcome the president's financial and psychological advantages.

Gore has been virtually missing in political action since he was beaten by Bush. He made a major speech urging Bush to get United Nations backing for any invasion of Iraq, but on a wide array of domestic issues he has been silent.

A book promotion tour by Gore and his wife Tipper later this fall is unlikely to do much to energize demoralized Democrats. The Gores' topic is family values -- while the country is focused on the economy and possible war.

This week voters rejected two famous Democratic names -- a second-generation Kennedy, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, running for governor of Maryland, and former Vice President Walter Mondale, running for the Senate seat of the late Paul Wellstone in Minnesota.

The Mondale defeat was particularly poignant. I had felt that the stature and experience of an elderly statesman would outweigh the youthful vigor of his GOP opponent. Alas, that reasoning was fatally flawed.

It was a case of "what have you done for me lately?" And Mondale,74, had been away from public service for too long. The Democrats, up against the president's 67 well-publicized campaign stops raising money and touting GOP candidates, simply couldn't compete on a nationwide basis. They lacked star power, and their themes lacked substance.

Former President Bill Clinton campaigned extensively for selected Democrats, but he is still controversial and not welcome everywhere. Party elders can't decide if he helps more than he hurts.

Gore campaigned for 16 Democratic candidates, a modest effort for a party's titular leader. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, who has presidential ambitions, campaigned for 29 candidates. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina stumped for 16. Connecticut's Joe Lieberman, Gore's 2000 running mate who also lusts after the White House, vastly outdid both Gore and Kerry with 64 campaign appearances across the country. Senator Lieberman has promised not to run if Gore does. Gore says he will decide by the end of the year.

House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt and Senate Democratic Tom Daschle also campaigned valiantly for colleagues, seeking to increase their party's numbers in the House and Senate. They both failed to block the Bush juggernaut although South Dakotan Daschle managed to rescue his home state's endangered Democratic senator Tim Johnson.

This record does not bode well for victory in a 2004 contest against a popular GOP president. Both Gephardt and Daschle had been mulling the possibility of a run for the White House. Gephardt promptly announced he would step down from his House leadership post and left open the possibility that he might yet run for president. However, prudence now dictates that they sit out that competition.

The Democratic campaign strategy this year was to downplay the party's differences with Bush on terrorism and a possible war with Iraq. And the Democrats avoided any hint that the president's big 2001 tax cuts should be reversed or delayed even though most of them are appalled that the cuts heavily benefit the rich. The failure to confront Bush directly left the party without a clear vision that could arouse local partisans.

The final New York Times/CBS News poll of the campaign showed that barely a third of respondents felt the Democrats had presented "a clear plan for the country." Party loyalists contend they did have a good message but couldn't get it out past all the static over war, terrorism, snipers and negative advertisements.

But it was the Democrats' own fault that they provided only mushy alternatives and let the president pre-empt the national stage with an unchallenged agenda.

Many of the congressional races were won by a whisker, demonstrating that the country is still basically as evenly divided ideologically as it was two years ago when Gore won the popular vote but lost the crucial Florida ballot count.

Ambivalent about making a second run for the White House, Gore has showed recently that his commitment to national politics is spotty at best. If he does intend to seek a replay against Bush, he will not get the Democratic presidential nomination without a fight.

The party would do well to field a fresh face. There are several attractive hopefuls who have yet to be nationally tested but are eager to try, Kerry and Edwards among them. The old familiar names don't have what it takes any more, although there's always someone who doesn't get it. Former Sen. Gary Hart, 65, who lost the nomination to Mondale in 1984 and blew a subsequent campaign in 1992 over a sex scandal, suggested he might offer his name again. What nerve.

It's time, as Mondale wisely observed in a gracious concession speech, for the Democrats to move on.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2002 10:46:54 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I heard someone mention on Foxnews earlier the possibility of Al Gore running for President in 2004 with Hitlery as his running mate!
That means she would have to step down from her Senator position to even run.
2 posted on 11/09/2002 10:50:19 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
no no no...it's

GORE / PELOSI

3 posted on 11/09/2002 10:52:10 AM PST by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The Democrats, up against the president's 67 well-publicized campaign stops raising money and touting GOP candidates, simply couldn't compete on a nationwide basis. They lacked star power, and their themes lacked substance. Former President Bill Clinton campaigned extensively for selected Democrats, but he is still controversial and not welcome everywhere. Party elders can't decide if he helps more than he hurts.

I don't know if the Klintons infected Hollywood or the other way around. Its all style over substance for the libs.

4 posted on 11/09/2002 10:57:43 AM PST by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Gore please dont't run. Let Pelosi run. Please, please?

Instead "take a load off" and do this:

Click Here

5 posted on 11/09/2002 10:57:51 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Lieberman didn't.
6 posted on 11/09/2002 10:58:20 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Kerry/Pelosi. Kerry/Clinton. Pelosi/Clinton.

Any of the above combinations in 2004 would set back the socialists and their Party for the next 25 years, minimum.

7 posted on 11/09/2002 10:58:35 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
GORE/GEPHARDT
8 posted on 11/09/2002 11:04:18 AM PST by Pookie Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Why would Hil have to surrender her senate post? John McCain seemed to hold onto his.
9 posted on 11/09/2002 11:10:04 AM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Kerry/Clinton will do well. Now how would they energize the Negro vote?
10 posted on 11/09/2002 11:11:28 AM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
The winning democrat ticket for 2004 is, of course, Al Gore and Barbra Streisand. You've have the political savvy of Gore and the cash and star power of Babs. Of course, they'd have no chance of winning the election but look how much fun it would be.

Hillie won't do anything 'til 2008 when Bush can't run. Pelosi will keep things to the left for Hillie.

11 posted on 11/09/2002 11:20:39 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Cultural Jihad; Liz; Mudboy Slim; Howlin
It's time, as Mondale wisely observed in a gracious concession speech, for the Democrats to move on.

Ya thing they can move on - in this country? Doubtful.

Check 'em out - fresh WOUNDS were just inflicted and they're looking for what - a message? Nope - a person. The message remains the same - and it'll still be a loser. (And what, exactly, is the wisdom of Mondale?)

The fun begins. Please be careful whilst spitting coffee on your computer monitor during the Sunday morning shows.

12 posted on 11/09/2002 11:25:33 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Can't wait for the Sunday talks.......this ougha be good......
13 posted on 11/09/2002 11:27:51 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
You've have the political savvy of Gore...

Sounds like something served with turkey - savvy gravy-toss.

Happy Thanksgiving!

14 posted on 11/09/2002 11:29:04 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ragin1
I thought that there were new rules which kept someone from running for 2 seats at the same time.
15 posted on 11/09/2002 11:41:46 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drango

Run, Al....please.

16 posted on 11/09/2002 12:00:44 PM PST by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Party elders can't decide if he [Clinton] helps more than he hurts.

Here's an idea: send him into, oh, say, two or three dozen more races next time, just so we can find out.
17 posted on 11/09/2002 12:00:50 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
No, no, Al! Don't listen to these geeks! Run, Al, Run! Don't listen to that senile loser from Minnewhereverthehellitis! You were born to rule and only GWB and those GOP reactionaries cheated you out of your rightful inheritance.

Please, Al, as one who truly believes in what you can really achieve, listen to me: You owe all of us the chance to re-elect you the second time. For the love of Armand Hammer, put on your Alpha male prosthesis and RUN, BABY, RUN!
18 posted on 11/09/2002 12:52:47 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Ah don' think theysa heedin'...

19 posted on 11/09/2002 12:57:31 PM PST by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Al...don't listen to them. Your party needs you to run. Do it for the party Al. They need your analysis of world events such as how cow gas pollutes the atmosphere, how the mean Republicans are going to kick all the old ladies off social security and use the money for corporate tax breaks, and how you, Al, really won Florida.

We need a man who invented the Internet, whose mother sang him the union label song before bed each night, and who deep-tongued his wife on national tv.

Please run, you stiff lying blowhard.

20 posted on 11/09/2002 1:39:36 PM PST by irish_lad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson