Smith Table for Matches for Air India Flight 182, Pan Am Flight 103, United Airlines Flight 811, Trans World Airlines Flight 800, and China Airlines Flight 611 |
|||||
Evidence |
AI 182 (Forward Cargo Door) |
PA103 (Forward Cargo Door) |
UAL 811 (Forward Cargo Door) |
TWA 800 (Forward Cargo Door) |
China Airlines Flight 611 (Aft Cargo Door) |
Boeing 747 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Early model -100 or -200 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Overpressure relief door(s) in forward cargo door open/jammed | Maybe | Yes | Yes | Yes | Missing in Aft Cargo Door |
Sudden airframe breakup in flight (partial or total) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Breakup occurs amidships | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, aft of wing. |
High flight time (over 55,000 flight hours) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Aged airframe (over 18 years of service) | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Previous maintenance problems with forward cargo door | Yes | Maybe | Yes | Maybe | Unknown |
Initial event within an hour after takeoff | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Initial event at about 300 knots while proceeding normally in all parameters | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Initial event has unusual radar contacts | Maybe | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Initial event involves hull rupture in or near forward cargo door area | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | In or near aft cargo door |
Initial event starts with sudden sound | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Initial event sound is loud | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Initial event sound is audible to humans | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Initial event followed immediately by abrupt power cut to data recorder | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, FDR cut first, then CVR power |
Initial event sound matched to explosion of bomb sound | No | No | No | No | No |
AI 182 | PA103 | UAL 811 | TWA 800 | China Airlines Flight 611 | |
Initial event sound matched to explosive decompression sound in wide body airliner | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, Rapid Decompression |
Torn off skin on fuselage above forward cargo door area | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes for aft door |
Unusual paint smears on and above forward cargo door | Maybe | Maybe | Yes | Yes | Unknown |
Evidence of explosion in forward cargo compartment | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unknown in aft |
Foreign object damage to engine or cowling of engine number three | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unknown |
Fire/soot in engine number three |
Maybe |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Foreign object damage to engine or cowling of engine number four |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Right wing leading edge damaged in flight | Yes | Maybe | Yes | Maybe | Unknown |
Vertical stabilizer damaged in flight | Yes | Yes | Yes | Maybe | Yes |
AI 182 | PA103 | UAL 811 | TWA 800 | China Airlines Flight 611 | |
Right horizontal stabilizer damaged in flight |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
More severe inflight damage on starboard side than port side |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Port side relatively undamaged by inflight debris |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Vertical fuselage tear lines just aft or forward of the forward cargo door |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes for aft cargo door |
Fracture/tear/rupture at a midspan latch of forward cargo door |
Maybe |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Midspan latching status of forward cargo door reported as latched |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Airworthiness Directive 88-12-04 implemented (stronger lock sectors) |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Unknown |
Outwardly peeled skin on upper forward fuselage |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Rectangular shape of shattered area around forward cargo door |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Unknown |
Forward cargo door fractured in two longitudinally |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Maybe |
Yes for aft cargo door |
Status of aft cargo door as intact and latched | Yes | Yes | Yes | Maybe | No |
AI 182 | PA103 | UAL 811 | TWA 800 | China Airlines Flight 611 | |
Passengers suffered decompression type injuries | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unknown |
At least nine missing and never recovered passenger bodies | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Wreckage debris field in two main areas, forward and aft sections of aircraft |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Initial official opinion of probable cause as bomb explosion. |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No and considered |
Initial official determination modified from bomb explosion |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
AI 182 | PA103 | UAL 811 | TWA 800 | China Airlines Flight 611 | |
Structural failure considered for probable cause |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Inadvertently opened forward cargo door considered for probable cause |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes for aft cargo door |
Official probable cause as bomb explosion |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Official probable cause as 'improvised explosive device' |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Official probable cause as explosion by unstated cause |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
Unknown |
Official probable cause as explosion in center fuel tank with unknown ignition source | No | No | No | Yes | Unknown |
Official probable cause as improper latching of forward cargo door | No | No | Yes | No | Unknown |
Official probable cause as switch /wiring inadvertently opening forward cargo door |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Unknown |
Significant Direct and Tangible Evidence Obtained for Four B747 Breakups in Flight |
AI 182 |
PA103 |
UAL 811 |
TWA 800 |
China Airlines Flight 611 |