Ann Coulter: Party of Adultery and Abortion Takes A Hit

Human Events ^ | 11/8/02 | Ann Coulter

[RKV]

and I should work on my typing.

[Charles Martel]

Ann Coulter is a warrior!

Hmmm...

Close. Pretty darned close. :-)

[RKV]

I don't care where they came from or why you kicked them out. Clean up your own trash.

[johnb838]

It's a risky business, attacking Ann Coulter on Free Republic. Better don that flame-retardant suit.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

"Party of Adultery and Abortion Takes A Hit" ~~ Who? The Libertarians?

Obviously not, given that 3 of the last 4 Libertarian Nominees for President (Paul '88, Browne '96, Browne '00) expressly called for the repeal of Roe vs. Wade.

Bearing False Witness is a violation of the Ninth Commandment.

[Revolting cat!]

Moreover, being pro-choice is not the same as being pro-abortion.

Exactly! Why do you think it's called "choice"? After all, who could be against "choice"? We're all for choice, aren't we? A counseling service for women who have had an abortion advertises its services in newspapers as counseling "after choice". "Choice" is now a word to describe an event! Hurray for euphemisms!

[onedoug]

Note everyone....

[RKV]

Thanks for the FACTS.

[ravinson]

Sorry, Ann Coulter does a GREAT JOB. Apparently you have not read her book.

She seems to be all about selling books rather than promoting conservativism. She's very good at singing to the choir, but this particular column lacks substance and seems rather typical of what I've seen/heard from her.

You should get your facts stratight before you criticise her.

You haven't supplied anything to dispute the facts I have presented, so all you're doing is making my point that she's very good at selling books to conservatives but lousy at advancing conservatism.

[RKV]

Your criticism contained no quotes so I felt no need to respond with specifics. If you want details you might try reading her book - its at the library.

[ravinson]

We're all for choice, aren't we?

Not abortion prohibitionist zealots like you.

[RKV]

See Samuel Adams for similar invective from the 1770s.

[God is good]

Poor sampling; Paul Browne is only one of many. I've met plenty of Libertarians who agree with Roe v. Wade as well as legalized prostitution and drugs.

[Cicero]

Moreover, being pro-choice is not the same as being pro-abortion.

It's not? The distinction escapes me. Where have you been the past 30 years? Pro-choice is nothing but a weasel-worded Orwellian obfuscation for pro-abort.

[FreedomCalls]

Indeed, you can see the division here. The support for Davis is limited to the San Franciscoarea and the coast nort and south of it along with a little area around LA and the Mexican border. Simon ruled in all the rest of the state, in the mostly agricultural areas where people have real jobs.

[Lizavetta]

Moreover, being pro-choice is not the same as being pro-abortion.

Oh please. NOBODY, even Gloria Steinem and Molly Yard, would WANT to go through the physical reality of an abortion, or even have their daughters go through the procedure. Nobody is pro-abortion, in that sense.

But when you stand by and watch evil happen, even though you personally wouldn't do the evil, you are on the side of evil.

[ravinson]

Your criticism contained no quotes so I felt no need to respond with specifics.

Wrong. I specifically took exception to her suggestion that Republicans "frowned" on adultery. Moreover, you said I had my facts wrong and now you're unable to back that up. You seem to be just reacting emotionally to the fact that I am not in love with Ann Coulter like so many conservatives like you who falsely claim to be less emotionally driven in politics than Democrats. Neither Ann Coulter's approach nor your approach is advancing conservatism.

[NEWwoman]

Thanks for the picture. It says a lot.

Porn belt green.
Corn belt red.

[RKV]

No one is responsible for what others do. Its on their own souls.

[God is good]

Nowhere does the Constitution call for murder as a choice. The judges made up the law. Those who are for the religion of murder of the unborn are usally the same who are against freedom of religious choice in public schools.

If the unborn aren't humans, then why do the human bodyparts of the killed baby have to be removed from the womb?