Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter: Party of Adultery and Abortion Takes A Hit
Human Events ^
| 11/8/02
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 11/08/2002 3:06:20 PM PST by Jean S
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-320 next last
To: RKV
and I should work on my typing.
21
posted on
11/08/2002 3:32:20 PM PST
by
RKV
To: Enterprise
Ann Coulter is a warrior! Hmmm...
Close. Pretty darned close. :-)
To: johnb838
I don't care where they came from or why you kicked them out. Clean up your own trash.
23
posted on
11/08/2002 3:33:04 PM PST
by
RKV
To: ravinson
It's a risky business, attacking Ann Coulter on Free Republic. Better don that flame-retardant suit.
24
posted on
11/08/2002 3:33:10 PM PST
by
johnb838
To: God is good
"Party of Adultery and Abortion Takes A Hit" ~~ Who? The Libertarians?Obviously not, given that 3 of the last 4 Libertarian Nominees for President (Paul '88, Browne '96, Browne '00) expressly called for the repeal of Roe vs. Wade.
Bearing False Witness is a violation of the Ninth Commandment.
To: ravinson
Moreover, being pro-choice is not the same as being pro-abortion. Exactly! Why do you think it's called "choice"? After all, who could be against "choice"? We're all for choice, aren't we? A counseling service for women who have had an abortion advertises its services in newspapers as counseling "after choice". "Choice" is now a word to describe an event! Hurray for euphemisms!
To: Saundra Duffy
Note everyone....
27
posted on
11/08/2002 3:42:39 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
Thanks for the FACTS.
28
posted on
11/08/2002 3:43:57 PM PST
by
RKV
To: RKV
Sorry, Ann Coulter does a GREAT JOB. Apparently you have not read her book. She seems to be all about selling books rather than promoting conservativism. She's very good at singing to the choir, but this particular column lacks substance and seems rather typical of what I've seen/heard from her.
You should get your facts stratight before you criticise her.
You haven't supplied anything to dispute the facts I have presented, so all you're doing is making my point that she's very good at selling books to conservatives but lousy at advancing conservatism.
29
posted on
11/08/2002 3:44:00 PM PST
by
ravinson
To: ravinson
Your criticism contained no quotes so I felt no need to respond with specifics. If you want details you might try reading her book - its at the library.
30
posted on
11/08/2002 3:46:19 PM PST
by
RKV
To: Revolting cat!
We're all for choice, aren't we? Not abortion prohibitionist zealots like you.
31
posted on
11/08/2002 3:46:41 PM PST
by
ravinson
To: ravinson
See Samuel Adams for similar invective from the 1770s.
32
posted on
11/08/2002 3:47:42 PM PST
by
RKV
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Poor sampling; Paul Browne is only one of many. I've met plenty of Libertarians who agree with Roe v. Wade as well as legalized prostitution and drugs.
To: ravinson
Moreover, being pro-choice is not the same as being pro-abortion. It's not? The distinction escapes me. Where have you been the past 30 years? Pro-choice is nothing but a weasel-worded Orwellian obfuscation for pro-abort.
34
posted on
11/08/2002 3:48:41 PM PST
by
Cicero
To: NEWwoman
Indeed, you can see the division here. The support for Davis is limited to the San Franciscoarea and the coast nort and south of it along with a little area around LA and the Mexican border. Simon ruled in all the rest of the state, in the mostly agricultural areas where people have real jobs.
To: ravinson
Moreover, being pro-choice is not the same as being pro-abortion.Oh please. NOBODY, even Gloria Steinem and Molly Yard, would WANT to go through the physical reality of an abortion, or even have their daughters go through the procedure. Nobody is pro-abortion, in that sense.
But when you stand by and watch evil happen, even though you personally wouldn't do the evil, you are on the side of evil.
To: RKV
Your criticism contained no quotes so I felt no need to respond with specifics. Wrong. I specifically took exception to her suggestion that Republicans "frowned" on adultery. Moreover, you said I had my facts wrong and now you're unable to back that up. You seem to be just reacting emotionally to the fact that I am not in love with Ann Coulter like so many conservatives like you who falsely claim to be less emotionally driven in politics than Democrats. Neither Ann Coulter's approach nor your approach is advancing conservatism.
37
posted on
11/08/2002 3:55:10 PM PST
by
ravinson
To: FreedomCalls
Thanks for the picture. It says a lot.
Porn belt green.
Corn belt red.
38
posted on
11/08/2002 3:55:41 PM PST
by
NEWwoman
To: Lizavetta
No one is responsible for what others do. Its on their own souls.
39
posted on
11/08/2002 3:57:52 PM PST
by
RKV
To: ravinson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-320 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson