[ravinson]

Your criticism contained no quotes so I felt no need to respond with specifics.

Wrong. I specifically took exception to her suggestion that Republicans "frowned" on adultery. Moreover, you said I had my facts wrong and now you're unable to back that up. You seem to be just reacting emotionally to the fact that I am not in love with Ann Coulter like so many conservatives like you who falsely claim to be less emotionally driven in politics than Democrats. Neither Ann Coulter's approach nor your approach is advancing conservatism.

[RKV]

Horse manure. To judge a writer you have to read more than one article.

[RKV]

You can read for yourself here.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1400046610/ref=lib_rd_next_6/002-0442321-0465651?v=glance&s=books&vi=reader&img=6#reader-link

[antaresequity]

Neither Ann Coulter's approach nor your approach is advancing conservatism.

Get a clue brother...she gets people fired up and enthusiastic about being conservative...she is a total babe, way smart...and she is a republican...If that doesnt advance conservatisim your frankly clueless

But then again, maybe you can lead us to the promised land Moses...

You are really arogant...and thats ok...

I wait with breathless anticipation for your works that tie together all of the abstract concepts of conservatisim...

[Agamemnon]

Guess you'd have to convince us that you were a conservative of any standing to throw stones at Ann Coulter in the first place. Most, I would suppose, are persuaded that were you and she to engage in an intellectual battle of conservtive wit, she'd have your frilly pantaloons wrapped around your powdered wig in no time.