[Junior]

The ID crowd hasn't submitted anything for peer review. If the paper has its Is dotted and its Ts crossed and has enough detail that other researchers can replicate the process the original researcher used, it will be taken seriously by the peer-review community. There is no grand conspiracy to silence ID, just as there was no grand conspiracy against the theory of Relativity by the entrenched Æther community. The IDers don't get published because they have nothing to publish.

[LiteKeeper]

Sorry, but you are wrong. I have several reports at home in my files of efforts by legitimate research scientists to get published, and universally, the papers are rejected, usually using a lame excuse such as "it is religion, not science." There are over 600 ID/creationist scientists listed at ICR, with legitimate PhDs' in scientific disciplines. That are not religious quacks...

There is also a report, I believe from Nature magazine, of the hiring and subsequently firing a sciene writer, simply because he expressed interest in exploring ID. There is rampant bias in the Darwinist world...it is undeniable.

[ksen]

The ID crowd hasn't submitted anything for peer review. If the paper has its Is dotted and its Ts crossed and has enough detail that other researchers can replicate the process the original researcher used, it will be taken seriously by the peer-review community. There is no grand conspiracy to silence ID, just as there was no grand conspiracy against the theory of Relativity by the entrenched Æther community. The IDers don't get published because they have nothing to publish.

Hhmmmmm.....click here for an example of the kind of reception Dr. Behe has received when he has tried to have articles published.

Don't you love it when someone starts responding to things over 600 posts ago? ;^)