[LiteKeeper]

Sorry, but you are wrong. I have several reports at home in my files of efforts by legitimate research scientists to get published, and universally, the papers are rejected, usually using a lame excuse such as "it is religion, not science." There are over 600 ID/creationist scientists listed at ICR, with legitimate PhDs' in scientific disciplines. That are not religious quacks...

There is also a report, I believe from Nature magazine, of the hiring and subsequently firing a sciene writer, simply because he expressed interest in exploring ID. There is rampant bias in the Darwinist world...it is undeniable.

[LiteKeeper]

I modify my response just a bit, and offer the following articles for your consideration:

Do Creationists Publish in Notable Refereed Journals?

Dr Jonathan D. Sarfati,B.Sc. (Hons.), Ph.D., F.M

Dr Donald James Batten

Dr Pierre Gunnar JERLSTRÖM

Jerry Bergman, Ph.D., Biology

[Junior]

You're presenting third-hand information without attribution. Might it not be possible the researchers who submitted the papers had done shoddy work on those papers? That's more often than not the reason why papers are rejected.

[Right Wing Professor]

There are over 600 ID/creationist scientists listed at ICR, with legitimate PhDs' in scientific disciplines. That are not religious quacks...

Actually, the vast maority of listees have no significant body of published scientific research. I'd wager a random sampling of PhD.s would be signficantly more productive.