[LiteKeeper]

No - it indicates that the narrowmindedness of Darwinists will reject any and all efforts at peer review, a priori, believing that there is no scientific basis for ID, before they have even considered the writings of ID'ers. There are a number of accounts of this. Unfortunately, since I am at work, I can't provide citations.

[Junior]

The ID crowd hasn't submitted anything for peer review. If the paper has its Is dotted and its Ts crossed and has enough detail that other researchers can replicate the process the original researcher used, it will be taken seriously by the peer-review community. There is no grand conspiracy to silence ID, just as there was no grand conspiracy against the theory of Relativity by the entrenched Æther community. The IDers don't get published because they have nothing to publish.