Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Dakota Suspicions
The National Review ^ | 11-07-02 | Byron York

Posted on 11/07/2002 8:23:41 AM PST by jwalburg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2002 8:23:41 AM PST by jwalburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jwalburg; mr.sarcastic; Pippin; Hail Caesar; Marylander; hellinahandcart; KLT; Angelwood; ...
Can you say Glendening vs Sauerbrey? I knew you could.
2 posted on 11/07/2002 8:27:16 AM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
So the Democrats hold out a few precincts to see how many votes they need to manufacture. Big deal. Just another stolen election. That's the only way they can win now. Nothing to see here. Move along.
3 posted on 11/07/2002 8:30:03 AM PST by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg; AmishDude; aristeides
Even though the total number of voters in Shannon County has gone up dramatically, it appears that virtually none of them chose Thune.

Well written and researched article.

4 posted on 11/07/2002 8:30:04 AM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Has Thune conceded?
5 posted on 11/07/2002 8:34:11 AM PST by Reelect President Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
BUMP
6 posted on 11/07/2002 8:34:18 AM PST by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
However, I do not wish to put the people of South Dakota through this process unless it is absolutely necessary. Therefore, if there is no change in the vote totals or any irregularities after the official canvass, we will pursue no further action and the results will stand...No one would be happier than I to see those numbers change as the process continues. However, if the numbers stand, I am prepared to accept the outcome and know that my supporters and all those who have stood with me during this process will accept the outcome as well.

If Al Gore had taken this approach in 2000, the Democrats might not have lost the Senate this year, and Jeb! may have had a tougher time to win his second term. But when Al Gore declared war against the Republicans in 2000, the parameters in the equation changed.

If the Senate leadership hung in the balance, Thune's approach might need to be different. But, with things the way they are, the Republicans could lose more by fighting than by accepting the results, unless, of course, irregularities can be conclusively proven.

7 posted on 11/07/2002 8:36:17 AM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
No matter "that it will not affect the balance of power in Washington," voter fraud must be pursued and prosecuted with implacable vigor. There was voter fraud in Shannon County. Republicans must stand against it as forcefully as they did the Democrats' attempt to steal Florida in 2000 with "hanging chads."
8 posted on 11/07/2002 8:37:16 AM PST by Whilom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
I wonder if Trent Lott is going to put the kabosh on any effort to rectify this situation like he did in Louisiana when Landru illegally snatched the Senate seat from the Republican. She "won" because the riverboat gambling interests played with the loose slots in the ballot boxes.
9 posted on 11/07/2002 8:38:46 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Sounds like Baltimore in '94, when the last precincts counted in the city happened to have 100% turnout, all of which went to the Dems, and many of which only had a vote for in the governor's race... with the rest of the ballot untouched.

Nothing suspicious here... move along.

10 posted on 11/07/2002 8:39:09 AM PST by mr.sarcastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reelect President Dubya
No. According to the Washington Times he will wait for the recount results then decide what to do.
11 posted on 11/07/2002 8:39:25 AM PST by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reelect President Dubya
Technically, NO.
12 posted on 11/07/2002 8:40:41 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Whilom
You are right. Voter fraud should be treated like Treason. Generations of Democrats have treated it like an indoor sport.
13 posted on 11/07/2002 8:41:45 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Velly intelesting...there is something rotten in Shannon county...

Look at Thune's totals in the last precincts:

1) 166,558 (838 of 844)

2) 166,747 (841 of 844), an increase of 189

3) 166,707 (843 of 844) - a DECREASE of 40!!!

4) 166,954 (844 of 844) - an increase of 247

Someone needs to ask some questions here. There could have been some corrections made in previous precinct tallies that resulted in a decrease of 40 votes from 841 to 843 precincts tallied. There could also have been fraud.

IMO, the registration lists (signatures on the registrations) and voting records (signatures at the polls) should be carefully compared in Shannon county, before the count is certified by the state.
14 posted on 11/07/2002 8:44:10 AM PST by RandyRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Definately a Rat involved in the numbers. The FBI has already found some fraud.

The big question is, will they find enough and reverse the results?

Based on history,...............NO. (even if they do find enough)

15 posted on 11/07/2002 8:45:41 AM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
If we don't go in and fight this tooth and nail, we deserve to LOSE the Senate again.
16 posted on 11/07/2002 8:45:52 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Hello Mr. Ashcroft! Whatever Thune does, it is time to sic the FBI on voter fraud in SD. Let's string up some exemplars as a warning. If an FBI probe and prosecutions show enough fraud to have swung the election, political punishment (recall?) can follow.
17 posted on 11/07/2002 8:48:09 AM PST by Uncle Miltie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
He doesn't mention the apparent fact that every man and woman in the county, save approximately two, are registered to vote.

This blatant fraud MUST be prosecuted, or our entire system of government is a sham.

18 posted on 11/07/2002 8:53:59 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
I wonder if Trent Lott is going to put the kabosh on any effort to rectify this situation ... You mean the Lottless that bowed at sinkEmperor's feet and tossed the House memebers out when impeachment reach the Senate? Need you ask? Lott is thoroughly blackmailable, as evidenced in his 'leadership' on crucial issues, just as Newt was with the Dornan defrauding by Sanchez henchfolk. Time for 'Trent' to go!
19 posted on 11/07/2002 8:58:46 AM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
If the Senate leadership hung in the balance...

It does. Can you say John McCain and Lincoln Chafee?

20 posted on 11/07/2002 9:01:59 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson