Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New Democrat Plantation: A FR Roundup of Vote Fraud In South Dakota
The Free Republic ^ | November 6, 2002 | various members of the Free Republic

Posted on 11/06/2002 7:53:31 AM PST by an amused spectator

Vote Fraud South Dakota Style - by the numbers Posted by DownWithGreenspan On 10/31/2002

Dem Ethics? South Dakota Dems don’t acknowledge the importance of their voter-fraud problem Posted by xsysmgr On 10/29/2002

Resource: News on South Dakota Vote Fraud Posted by Republican_Strategist On 10/24/2002

The shambles in South Dakota (MICHELLE MALKIN) Posted by Sabertooth On 10/22/2002

Lost in Translation: Bilingual voting and the South Dakota Senate race ^ Posted by Utah Girl On 10/22/2002

South Dakota: Fraud cases cloud S.D. elections (Update) Posted by Ernest_at_the_Beach On 10/20/2002

Local Update - Election Fraud in South Dakota [my title] Posted by Oldeconomybuyer On 10/19/2002

First person charged with voter fraud [in South Dakota] Posted by jpthomas On 10/18/2002

Dems Paid $12,000 to South Dakota Vote Fraud Figure Posted by Tumbleweed_Connection On 10/18/2002

Shannon joins counties with voter trouble (South Dakota Vote Fraud Investigation) Posted by Brian Mosely On 10/18/2002

Dead Men Voting (South Dakota) Posted by Pokey78 On 10/15/2002

Voter Fraud Investigation (S. Dakota) Posted by mondonico On 10/14/2002

'MASSIVE' VOTER FRAUD UNDER INVESTIGATION IN SOUTH DAKOTA... Posted by vannrox On 10/12/2002

Indians will cast pivotal ballots on reservations in South Dakota Posted by JohnHuang2 On 09/01/2002

The Difference between North and South Dakota (Vanity) Posted by crystalk On 08/25/2002


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: democrats; pledge; theplantation; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: I'm ALL Right!
Thanks! I was hoping my fellow Freepers would add relevant articles to this thread. We'll keep bringing this unpleasantness up periodically. :-)
21 posted on 11/06/2002 9:16:55 AM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
Tom Daschle announced that he will be replaced on the ballot by LBJ and because he's dead (voted twice in this election) his widow, Lady Bird, will serve in his place.

From the movie Blazing Saddles:

"You'd do it for Randolph Scott." ;-)

22 posted on 11/06/2002 9:20:38 AM PST by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hexpoppy
I think this "loss" by Thune will be a good thing----it will force a vote fraud investigation and maybe bring the Rats dirty tactics into the daylight.

This is my hope as well. To borrow a term I heard a lot during the night, I'm cautiously optimistic.

23 posted on 11/06/2002 9:24:41 AM PST by Otta B Sleepin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Story about malfunctioning balloting machines from the Mitchell South Dakota Daily Republic. (posted FWIW - this probably is nothing.)
link: http://www.zwire.com/site/news.asp?brd=2166

Story excerpt:
All eyes were on Davison County during the wee hours today because a vote-counting machine malfunctioned, leaving in doubt statehouse and county races, and possibly the contest for U.S. Senate.

County Auditor Kathy Goetsch initially said repairs were expected by 1:30 a.m. today with final tabulations anticipated by 2:30 or 3 a.m. if all goes well. However, at 2 a.m., technicians had not yet arrived, and it appeared they would not arrive in Mitchell until about 2:30 a.m., pushing tabulations to at least 3:30 or 4 a.m.

"This error did not show up on our the test. I need to make that clear," Goetsch said Tuesday night. "I don't know why. ... We've had this system since 1998 and we've never had a problem like this."


24 posted on 11/06/2002 9:31:32 AM PST by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
In 2000, it was Flori-duh. In 2002, it's South Duh-Kota.
25 posted on 11/06/2002 9:32:46 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator; All
Want to tell lots of people about this? Go here:

Ignorance Making You Ill? Cure It!

for links, tools, & instructions about how to contact a pile of different people, and how to send a link to this story right here ( or anywhere else ) to a "mass email" using Outlook Express.


Also FYI--

-The Vote Fraud Archives--

-Need Vote Fraud articles, stories, and evidence? Here's a source--

26 posted on 11/06/2002 9:54:42 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ampat
It can and should be pursued as a contested election by John Thune. Thune won a close race and it was likely taken from him via fraud. Sudden 100% increase in voter turnout in one county since 2000, when all other counties had similar patterns, defies logic.

To pove it, we need show how and where the extra votes were manufactured. My guess is it can be done.

Voter registration grew in a few select counties in South Dakota. Those counties - in particular Shannon - had allegations of fraud. In November, voting patterns changed dramatically from previous elections.

27 posted on 11/06/2002 6:16:20 PM PST by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Spyder
I disagree. Letting the democrats get away with this ONE more time, is impossible. We've GOT to stop it.
28 posted on 11/06/2002 6:23:39 PM PST by Letitring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I don't know what The Little General was thinking - he must have been sure that the Democrats were going to take the whole enchilada, and that the Democrats in the national media would be able to bury this South Dakota business under the cover of THAT news.

For political incorrectness, your sentence just won the brass prize. Douchebag will award it, bring some phonebooks for him.

29 posted on 11/06/2002 6:24:52 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Letitring
Letting the democrats get away with this ONE more time, is impossible. We've GOT to stop it.

Yes, Ashcroft was a "gentleman" in Missouri, 2000, and let Carnahan's widow win the election when the voting areas were illegally kept open late for the bused in voters. It's long past time to let the Dems steal elections. They tried, oh how they tried in Florida, but the fix should not be in anymore.

30 posted on 11/06/2002 6:39:26 PM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
They pay Federal income tax. But they don't pay property tax, or tax from income generated off Tribal or trust land. Example: if you are an Indian cattle rancher and you run your cows on Tribal land, you don't pay tax on the money you make when you sell them.
31 posted on 11/06/2002 6:45:50 PM PST by tamikamaria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Letitring
I disagree. Letting the democrats get away with this ONE more time, is impossible. We've GOT to stop it.

The more I think it over, the more I agree with you now. We've rolled over enough times already, to the point they really think they can get away with it. Landrieu 6 years ago (sp?) and Sanchez/Dornan spring to mind.

32 posted on 11/06/2002 6:52:24 PM PST by Spyder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Spyder
Bless your heart, I was just thinking about what you said, too. LOL. I think you remember the (shudder) Gore episode that put us all in such agony. This particular thing won't be like that. The Feds are investigating the voter fraud in SD, along with that States top cops. That will continue, no matter what Mr. Thune does or doesn't do. All Mr. Thune asked for is a recount. He said he would hang in for the rest of it, if need be. WONDERFUL man. That investigation went Federal because of the Indian reservation being USED to accomplish democrat goals. It went State because South Dakota doesn't want that happening in it's house. :) Either way, as long as Thune will stand, I'll stand with him. I feel sure you will too. :)
33 posted on 11/06/2002 6:58:42 PM PST by Letitring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Letitring
You're right about it being totally different with investigation going on, as opposed to Jesse Jackson-style protests of imagined "disenfranchisement" in Florida, immediate court filings there, etc. I thought Mondale might pull that in Minnesota - thankfully I was wrong. I have to admit being very pleased with the apparent lack of Democrat cheating in most places this time, as well as with the Republican effort to get the vote out.

We had poll watchers for the first time in every precinct. The Republicans also had them watching which registered Republicans had voted and who hadn't, then going outside the 200-foot barriers and calling those who hadn't and asking them if they needed a ride, gently reminding them to vote, etc. Usually the unions here put on a massive push, and it appears they were actually dwarfed this time by the grass roots. It didn't hurt that the teachers here were pi$$ed at Cayetano and refused to endorse a Democrat for the first time in eons. They didn't endorse Lingle either, but by not endorsing the Dem they said a lot. The keiki (children) are a big issue here, and if someone's kid's teacher supports a candidate, they're more likely to vote that way.

34 posted on 11/06/2002 7:16:14 PM PST by Spyder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I have a question -- Does anyone know what if any validity check is being done in the South Dakota recount?
35 posted on 11/07/2002 12:05:59 AM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
Thanks, I've been reading many posts on South Dakota fraud....couldn't believe you have this many I haven't read yet! lol. Sure hope this is figured out.
36 posted on 11/08/2002 9:32:15 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Vote Fraud
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
37 posted on 11/10/2002 10:39:08 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson