Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge Siren: TOUCH SCREEN CONFUSION
Drudge ^ | 11/05/02 | Drudge

Posted on 11/05/2002 10:19:09 AM PST by TheConservator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Just returned from voting here in Marietta. This happened to my wife, but it was because she touched near the line between the candidates. If you don't touch in the middle of the area, it can happen. She saw what happened, and touched the Republican again, and it came up correctly.
21 posted on 11/05/2002 10:27:44 AM PST by Tiger6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Paper ballots with onsite counts by equal representation from both parties.

It doesn't matter that the results would be delayed a few hours, it's the only way to keep things halfway honest.

22 posted on 11/05/2002 10:28:07 AM PST by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat
LOL :)
23 posted on 11/05/2002 10:28:19 AM PST by KSApplePie_two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
I believe that ALL voters should be given a receipt that shows who they voted for.

That receipt would allow you to prove who you voted for to any rule-breaking political party that wanted to pay you for the "correct" vote.
24 posted on 11/05/2002 10:28:27 AM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
"Perhaps they should "test" the machines prior to election day to make sure they work properly, SHEESH."

You're missing the point, they DID test and they ARE working properly - it was changing Rep votes to Dem wasn't it?
25 posted on 11/05/2002 10:28:46 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I would like to know Drudge's source(s).

I know of one woman that called into Neil Boortz's show to complain of this problem in the 9:00 hour, but I have not heard of any other "widespread" problems. I certainly didn't have any problems when I voted this morning.

Unless Drudge can come up with some solid sources for this, I'd chalk it up to more of his tin foiliage.

26 posted on 11/05/2002 10:28:59 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scan59
I can report in on behalf of my wife.
She experienced this problem while voting this morning,
and she believes it is caused by her long fingernails.

The finger touches the screen in one place,
while the fingernail touches the screen in another place.
She managed to catch and correct her errors on "review".

Perhaps we ahould round-up all of those confiscated
nail-clippers forom all of the airports and rush them
over to the polling places !!!
27 posted on 11/05/2002 10:29:31 AM PST by Hanging Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
TOUCH SCREEN CONFUSION

This is the VERY reason the democRATs are pushing for touch-screen voting under the guise of election reform. No paper trail or no mechanical indication/tally of vote (or their "intent") WHATSOEVER! Makes their job much easier.

28 posted on 11/05/2002 10:29:41 AM PST by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Who's bright idea was it that there should be no paper record of the vote?
29 posted on 11/05/2002 10:29:50 AM PST by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Doesn't have to be fraud; rather, it could be a problem matching the touch screen inputs to the proper candidate -- it'd be a county-by-county sort problem. The old "off-by-one" problem could show up as this.

More than anything else, it suggests that there was inadequate testing of the electronic ballot assignments.

30 posted on 11/05/2002 10:30:11 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Dems are laying the groundwork for their post election lawsuits. RAT lawyers are in full salivation mode.
31 posted on 11/05/2002 10:30:48 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok
I believe that ALL voters should be given a receipt that shows who they voted for.

I like that idea. It gives a double check/balance to the electronic system.

32 posted on 11/05/2002 10:31:10 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
"It doesn't do you any good to worry and your concerns are probably unfounded."

Hope we can say that after the election.
33 posted on 11/05/2002 10:31:17 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Touch screens are notoriously inaccurate. I think they are a mistake.

If the person using it accidentally touches another part of the screen at the same time the are selecting, it will misread. Or if they set something on it.

The Texas computers use a dial device to select an entry and an enter button to mark it. It seems much more reliable than a touch screen.

34 posted on 11/05/2002 10:31:18 AM PST by WorldWatcher1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
darn straight - the device should print out a receipt showing you who you voted for. Amazing that they don't do it - I wonder what rational they use to justify not doing it?
35 posted on 11/05/2002 10:31:31 AM PST by Frapster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Why can't we have a paper-trail and why shouldn't I be able to connect to the GA state website and see who I voted for?

I agree on the paper trail, but I've got a major problem with being able to go onto the web to see who I voted for. I don't think the security is in place to handle that as of yet.

In addition, I'm pretty sure that the transmission of the current data is separate from the 'net - which is what keeps it secure.

36 posted on 11/05/2002 10:32:53 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Well ultimately the blame goes to those dolts who decided to go with computer voting. Both parties made the mistake, Dems in FL & GA, GOP in Texas.

If this is widespread in GA, FL, & TX, it could be the Dem strategy. The few early screwups against the Dems in TX & FL may have been intentionally done in Dem precincts to provide cover for their typical "both sides are doing it" argument to cover massive fraud in swing states such as GA.

I heard the Dallas County election commissioner speak of the TX problems on the radio yesterday. When asked if it was happening primarily in precincts with Democrat election judges, he said the instances were scattered throughout Dallas County, but would not directly answer the question. In Dallas, the election judge for each precinct is assigned by the party that won the precinct in the last election.


But still too early to tell if this is fraud, random error, or simply new system glitches.
37 posted on 11/05/2002 10:32:56 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGOPinCT
This is the VERY reason the democRATs are pushing for touch-screen voting under the guise of election reform

Doesn't surpise me

BTW .. did they ever find those 18 missing voting machines??

38 posted on 11/05/2002 10:32:57 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
While I would put nothing past the RATS when it comes to vote fraud, this really sounds like a result of sloppy set up and testing of the machines. Touch panels (think your Palm Pilot) normally have to be calibrated when booted for the first time so they "know" where the user's finger (or in the case of a PDA the stylus) is making contact with the screen. The point of touch is then made to line up with the application display you see on the screen. If the software doesn't know where the center of the screen is it may very well insert a "drift" between where you touch and what part of the application (vote checkbox in this case) records the input.

Could be deliberate but I lean towards bad set up, likely by people that have no idea what they're doing with the technology. If the workers are able to "address the problem as it occurs" this would lead me to believe they're actually resetting the screen calibration. Just a guess.

39 posted on 11/05/2002 10:33:46 AM PST by mitchbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
There are so many ways to commit election fraud with a computer, it makes hanging chads look like slackers.
40 posted on 11/05/2002 10:33:52 AM PST by Reelect President Dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson