Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/05/2002 4:53:08 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
bump!

Lawyers have become the priest class of our age. They sell indulgences so one may do what one historically, and has every right to do freely. To be a member of the bar today is to have a low number party card in the Nazis or the Communist International.
2 posted on 11/05/2002 5:17:50 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
As any pro-lifer already knows:

"Our great cornerstone of democracy, the rule of law, has become a source of power and influence, not liberty and justice. I resent the insidious manipulations of those entrusted with such authority and, even more, I despise our deliberate ignorance and passive acceptance of those shackles on the American spirit."

3 posted on 11/05/2002 5:35:46 AM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; Mia T; beckett; AndrewC; scripter; Dataman; Stingray; ...
Those who deal with the law at first hand -- legislators, judges, lawyers and regulators -- occupy positions at the pinnacle of power in a constitutional republic. So long as they act in good faith, morally, all benefit, but when the moral constraints erode, as they have since the mid-20th Century, moral cost becomes economic cost in direct proportion to the rise in uncertainty. Those costs are massive. I don't believe that this is at all well-understood. Unbridled democracy, mob rule, is a catalyst to this decay.

Your thoughts?

4 posted on 11/05/2002 5:58:48 AM PST by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
There's a big difference between rule of law and rule of lawyers. In striving for the former, we've ended up with the latter.
5 posted on 11/05/2002 6:02:57 AM PST by n2002duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The USA no longer has a Rule of Law....it has a tyranny of lawyers.

The tyrants make the law whatever they want it to be to obtain the highest $$$$ return and the Republic be dammned.

8 posted on 11/05/2002 6:38:00 AM PST by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
As with any parasite/varmit situation, we just need an approprite bounty on lawyers for about a year.
10 posted on 11/05/2002 6:50:39 AM PST by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
We've got plenty of "LAW" but very little justice.
11 posted on 11/05/2002 7:48:57 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
We face the Law of Rule, tyranny of Blackrobes usurping all ultimate powers through their "judicial reviews" of political agenda litigation.

When we are told what our Constitution and laws mean, under penalty of law, rather than what they clearly say through the written word, we have rulers.

The in-your-face corruption by the Clintonazis is a large step toward fascism - self-serving socialists controlling the major factors of production through graft's Play for Pay, under threat of the police powers of the State.

America has surrendered the doctrine of separation of powers. Our rulers have fatally injured our Republic by demanding interpretations of a "living" Constitution which ignores our Bill of Rights, to the benefit of the expanding powers of government...a government of the government, by the government, and for the government...

We have but a fading illusion of a Rule of Law.
12 posted on 11/05/2002 8:01:18 AM PST by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
What's an "ornerstone"?
16 posted on 11/05/2002 9:50:18 AM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
The guy's dodging the obvious point: laws are for honest people. The Rule of Law is meaningful only when the people are already predisposed to follow the laws.

The proliferation of laws exists because of the tendency of people to try to find ways around the letter of the law. If you can't trust people to follow the spirit of the law, the motivation is to try to hem them in with the letter of the law.

In dicussions like this, it's always good to remember what John Adams said: "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . ... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

17 posted on 11/05/2002 10:12:10 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson