Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GUILTY - Now jury decides if they will live or die [Wichita Massacre]
The Wichita Eagle ^ | 11/05/02 | Ron Sylvester

Posted on 11/05/2002 4:37:02 AM PST by KS Flyover

Today, Jonathan and Reginald Carr begin fighting for their lives.

A jury Monday found the brothers guilty of killing four Wichita residents on Dec. 15, 2000.

Now, the jury must decide whether to sentence the brothers to death. Judge Paul Clark ordered the penalty phase of the trial to begin this morning.

"Justice has been served -- and it is long awaited," Chief Deputy District Attorney Kim Parker said.

Jurors found Reginald Carr, 24, guilty of all 50 crimes charged against him, including the capital murders of Dec. 15, the first-degree murder of Ann Walenta four days earlier and the Dec. 7 carjacking and robbery of Andrew Schreiber.

Earlier in the day, Clark denied a request by jurors to consider lesser charges than first-degree felony murder in the death of Walenta, a cellist with the Wichita Symphony who died Jan 2, 2001, from her wounds. The jury convicted both of the Carrs on the original charge.

The jury also found Jonathan Carr, 22, guilty of the four capital murders and 39 other crimes. But jurors found him not guilty of four crimes related to the carjacking of Schreiber. The former Wichita State University baseball player could not identify Jonathan Carr as one of his attackers.

"This obviously was a thinking person's jury," District Attorney Nola Foulston said afterward. "They gave grave consideration to the responsibility they have."

Tears fell throughout the courtroom as the verdicts were read, but not from the Carrs.

As he left the courtroom after the verdict, Reginald Carr appeared to smile and wink at family members of victims.

Jonathan Carr didn't look at the victims' families, staring straight ahead as guards escorted him back to the Sedgwick County Jail.

The guilty verdicts included convictions on multiple counts of rape, aggravated sodomy and robbery, crimes that prosecutors say were part of a three-hour ordeal that five friends endured before they were driven to a soccer field near K-96 and Greenwich Road.

Jason Befort, Aaron Sander, Heather Muller, Brad Heyka and another woman were forced to kneel in the snow before being shot in the back of the head.

The first four were killed, but the woman survived because a plastic hair clip diverted the bullet. Bleeding from her wounds, she ran a mile to the nearest house to call for help. She provided the most damaging testimony of the trial.

The jury -- which deliberated for about 12 hours over three days -- found the Carrs guilty of not only raping the survivor and another woman but also of rapes against the three male victims. That was based on the men being forced at gunpoint to have sex with the women.

Monday, emotions began simmering when it became clear the jury found the two men guilty of capital murder.

By the time court adjourned, family members of the five who were killed -- along with the two survivors -- hugged police detectives and prosecutors.

"The reaction of the family was as we expected, one of relief," Foulston said, saying the family members themselves wished to decline comment.

Parker shed tears as she received hugs from relatives of victims and officers.

"I've waited on a lot of juries before, and you never know what a jury will do," Parker said. "But this case did have overwhelming evidence.... This has been a very long process."

The eight-week trial included more than 800 exhibits, including DNA linking both brothers to the scene andmassive amounts of property belonging to all the victims that was found in the brothers' possession when they were arrested.

After the verdict, Foulston praised the community, which provided valuable tips to help police make quick arrests and catch the Carrs still holding evidence from the crime.

"This showed a true community policing effort," Foulston said.

Said Wichita Police Chief Norman Williams: "I've been here 28 years, and this is probably the most significant case as far as having a rippling effect on the community. It was a case that the community can feel good about because it was a community effort involving everything, including citizens stepping forward."

The courtroom was well-guarded during the reading of the verdict. It was filled with members of the Police Department's homicide division and gang unit, as well as at least 10 Sedgwick County sheriff's deputies.

Defense lawyers had little to say.

"The trial is not over," said Val Wachtel, lawyer for Reginald Carr.

The defense will begin presenting witnesses today from the Carrs' family, as well as mental health professionals, to show why the jury should return a sentence of less than death.

Foulston said she has known from the beginning what the punishment should be.

"Without equivocation, without hesitation," she said, "I decided to seek the death penalty against both Jonathan and Reginald Carr."


Contributing: Hurst Laviana of The Eagle; Associated Press.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: carr; kansas; wichita; wichitamassacre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: skeeter
Hate crimes laws are a farce.

Of course they are. And worse. They are racist. Hate crime laws were never meant to apply to black on white or gay on straight hate crimes. And they have never been applied this way to my knowledge. They are another sickening, immoral, and dangerous kind if law. These are laws that disgust and inflame and increase the level of hate.

41 posted on 11/05/2002 8:09:37 AM PST by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
They are another sickening, immoral, and dangerous kind if law.

Even worse, the law was created for political effect. Another step on the road to a banana republic.

42 posted on 11/05/2002 8:12:08 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Chi-Town Lady
As vile as these two pukes are, they are according to our constitution, entitled to a defense.

True. But THESE Lawyers did not have to choose to defend them. The court could have appointed lawyers. But these guys are on a crusade to get everybody they can off the death penalty. And in so doing, they deprive victims and their families of the justice they deserve. They may not be as bad as the Carrs. But they are still filth in my book.

43 posted on 11/05/2002 8:13:38 AM PST by republicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Chi-Town Lady
"A lawyer somewhere would have to defend them no matter what."

I understand that that is the law, but I disagree with it. Guilt in this case is so obvious and the hideousness of the crime so great that there should have been no one willing to defend these people. Let there be a mistrial and let the defendents end up on the street. Then, let the outrage of the community make itself felt. Lynching would be entirely appropriate in this case. Some crimes are so great that a person simply forfeits all protections of the social contract and the perpetrator is little better than a rabid animal who must be put down.

As it is, appeals will drag on for years, and the Carr brothers will be able to enjoy all the benefits of subsidised government housing and cable television until the nature of their crimes fades down the Memory Hole and they become the next Mumias. How much you wanna bet that they "find God" and convert to Islam behind bars?

"The lawyers did their job, maybe not even to the best of their ability because they were so outraged by the crime."

. . . and therein lie the grounds for dismissal on appeal.

44 posted on 11/05/2002 8:26:30 AM PST by Goetz_von_Berlichingen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen
wrong. not entitled to a perfect defense, or even the best defense possible, just a fair defense within the legal community. No grounds for dismissal.
45 posted on 11/05/2002 9:38:26 AM PST by job
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen
Believe me I understand where you are coming from. These low bellied cockroaches should receive swift justice but unfortunately there are those who believe that death is not the answer and will put up such a stink to stop it from happening. I am not one of those individuals. I cannot fathom, in my wildest, how anyone could do such horrendous things to another human being. I could agree that after being found guilty, one quick appeal (say within 90 days of the original sentencing)and then it's an eye for an eye. But in order for that to happen we have to change the laws first. If not would we really be any better than the scum?
46 posted on 11/05/2002 9:44:07 AM PST by Chi-Town Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
I think the horrible case you mentioned (the woman was quoted as saying "I hit this white guy, te-hee-hee") took place in Atlanta. Naturally it has vanished down the memory hole of the leftist media.
47 posted on 11/05/2002 9:57:52 AM PST by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
I've held off of pinging to this thread on a daily basis (much as I've backed off of the sniper threads), to keep from bogging down. But with the verdict, a new ping is warranted.
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

48 posted on 11/05/2002 10:07:39 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KS Flyover
There is a time for mercy. This is not it.

Kill these insects.

49 posted on 11/05/2002 10:10:29 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KS Flyover
"Sammy Paul, another junior who had Befort as a coach, recalled the quiet day following his murder."

Sammy is lucky, most people who are murdered usually cannot recall the next day, even if it is quiet.

The only exception I am aware of are dead Democrat voters.

They are often recalled to come back to vote.

The Eagle might want to hire a home schooler to edit their articles.

50 posted on 11/05/2002 11:08:19 AM PST by Hal.009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: BurkeCalhounDabney
Excellent critique, teach!

Now how about sending todays lesson to Mr. Sylvester, who is in dire need of your instruction. :`)

Reach Ron Sylvester at 268-6514 or rsylvester@wichitaeagle.com

52 posted on 11/05/2002 3:15:18 PM PST by KS Flyover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson